Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Treysnonna

Rate this question


treysnonna

Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Not only the SOC, but any New & Material Evidence that is submitted Post Denial/NOD has to be worked by the RO Rating Dept prior to RO Certification to BVA.

As I recall reading in the way back, if the N & M Evidence doesn't result in the RO Awarding the Appealed issues, an SSOC is also required to be completed and provided to the Vet.

How many Vets, after choosing the traditional BVA Hearing appeal route, send in N & M Evidence at some future point prior to the RO Certification to the BVA? One can only imagine how much additional time is added before the Certification to the BVA can take place.

Semper Fi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
15 hours ago, Gastone said:

How many Vets, after choosing the traditional BVA Hearing appeal route, send in N & M Evidence at some future point prior to the RO Certification to the BVA? One can only imagine how much additional time is added before the Certification to the BVA can take place.

Semper Fi

You're looking at it wrong- How much does all this paper shuffling add to official's 'Number of persons supervised', and subsequently their power, pay and influence.

Thanks- Wish I knew more about appeals- Felling I will shortly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

ive always looked at the Date of appeals that the BVA is working on that is posted to the customer service website for the BVA. then you look at your Docket number. so if working on November of 2013 and we are in march 2017 thats another 2 years Before they start working on 2015 appeals... just my view

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

The VARO does not have to do anything in a timely manner.  This is why I say to try and get your claims decided in your favor at the VARO level.  Once they get to the BVA it could take years. The last time I went to the BVA I had a lawyer.   It only took about one year to get there but it took six months to get a denial of my appeal and the years to go to the Court of Vet Appeals and back to the BVA and back to the Court and then to Federal Court.  I lost even with my lawyer and what I thought was a slam/dunk.  This is why it is best to try and win at the VARO.  Just throw everything you can at them locally and don't hold anything back.  You have much more access at the VARO than at the BVA and none at the Court.  To wait 4 years for a BVA hearing and then to be denied will easily set you back 6-8 years before all is said and done to you.  I have used the DRO most often and even more than once with the same claim.  Just try and keep it local and wear them down with evidence and good representation.  If you had Berta in your back pocket or Asknod or some other expert it would be nice but lawyers can be good.

 

 John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
On 3/19/2017 at 6:47 PM, john999 said:

The VARO does not have to do anything in a timely manner. 

I guess that's my answer. They can just put the NOD on forget?
 

Most people have little to no awareness of the process- Even people who actually do your claims-

How many Vietnam Veterans are denied when there's an APO front and center right on their 2-1, clinic stamp or the 214 says 'RVN?'

In short, being denied is sometime unavoidable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Guys, I think we can all agree that the entire VA Comp Claims process is a real trip. The Vets (us) lack of VA process knowledge initially puts him at a significant disadvantage. Quite often the Vet relies on the first VSO-rep he has contact with to counsel and file his claim.

Some Vets can, some can't handle their appeals at the DRO Level. Very few can handle the BVA by their lonesome. Many opt for the VSO Free Representation, sometimes a good, sometimes a bad idea. After Waiting the 5+ yrs for a BVA Denial because either you or the VSO missed something would have to hurt your feelings.

Probably would be a decent idea to get a couple Free Legal Consults from (3) different VA  Appeals Lawyers. At some point, getting the RETRO, is worth the 20% Legal Fee. At the very least you should run your case by the DC Pro Bono Firm NVLSC, don't you think.

TREYSNONNA, your husbands BVA Docket 15 - 02319, I believe indicates his Appeal was the 2,319th appeal docketed in 2015. You might want to check the number of Decisions the BVA has been averaging for the last couple years.

Semper Fi

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use