Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

VA plans to outsource all compensation and pension exams

Rate this question


Buck52

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

In my opinion, the only detriment would be timeliness of getting C&P exam due to having to find/schedule exams.

In the one I remember, the C&P examiner primarily included the private doctor nexus opinion with their own examination opinion.

Results have been positive, but it has been four years since I had a non VA C&P exam.

Veterans just remember, verifiable medical evidence is the key. A diagnosis by a doctor by verifiable means (x-ray, CT-Scan, MRI, nerve conduction test, nuclear stress test, blood work, colonoscopy, etc) is both feet in the right direction.

 

1. In service incident.

2. Current diagnosis

3. Nexus connecting 1 & 2 or continuity of treatment.

 

GOOD LUCK...........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I see nothing but good coming out this for the Veteran.  How can a  C&P examiner that works for the VA remain impartial if they work for the VA? That in itself has inherent ethical issues.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

I believe this is solely centered around the numbers. Veterans complain the VA takes too long to process claims. Outsourcing results in quicker turnaround times and makes the numbers better for the VA.

The problem is there is zero accountability with contracted examiners. In my case, LHI did a C&P exam earlier this year and completely ignored very favorable evidence (specialist IMO). LHI management said they simply train examiners and schedule exams. The VARO rubber stamped what the examiner said which proved their "quality" review lacked substance.

The VA's answer to substandard exams is to dismiss the obvious errors and tell us to just file HLR or BVA appeal. While my HLR is on the back burner, there is no telling how many other veterans are getting substandard exams. This will definitely result in an increase in the number of veterans unnecessarily stuck in HLR and BVA lanes.

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Out of about a dozen outsourced C&P's, I've only had one bad one.  This bad one started out with me getting arrogant with her.  I don't recommend starting a C&P this way.  They have the power to put your claim in peril with their professional opinion.  Kill them with military kindness and you will be good.  Yes Maam, no Maam, thank you for your time and kindness Maam.  Now the VA C&P's were a different story.  I have not had a good one.  Some downplayed overwhelming evidence or didn't ask me DBQ questions and filled in their own answers.  Some stated I was an unreliable  reporter.  Some we're outright condescending.  Give me a choice, I'm doing the outsourced 100% of the time.  The only issue is getting the results of the C&P in a timely manner.  Sending in a FOIA and waiting sometimes 6 months is BS. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

El Train Copy that. Honey instead of vinegar. Based on my experience, subcontractor examiners seem to be not as ingrained in the VA "process." Had one today and long story short I offered a copy of a prior C&P exam, and the whole flavor of the exam shifted to my favor. I never had that happen with the limited number of VA in-house C&P's I've had. But in the end, it doesn't matter. I believe that contracting out to TCM, LHI and VES is what they are going to do because it is quicker and cheaper for the VA to do that. It's  part of the big plan to down size cost at the VA as the number of veterans continue to decline.IMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use