Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Bad Rating issue

Rate this question


LadyMC

Question

I filed a claim. Did a session with a private psychologist and was diagnosed with ptsd. Went to a c and p exam and the examiner did not accurately reflect all of my symptoms. Was given a low rating. Went back to the private psychologist who reviewed my c and p exam paperwork and concluded that one part was inconsistent with another part. He said that VSO scheduled another c and p exam. Just did that one. The va is calling it a request for increase rather than a dispute of the original claim. Below is the letter from the private psychologist after reviewing my case decision   

C1D22C34-9369-48F7-821C-EBE2EC07C447.thumb.jpeg.415f6279d94a0f70cf448bf492017fd7.jpeg
my question ....  they already sent me back pay to the date of my claim but at a much lower rating than the psychologist says I should qualify for.  If it is increased with this latest c and p exam, will I still get back pay for the difference back to my original claim date? 

Edited by LadyMC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

LadyMC

In my opinion, you are requesting a supplemental claim for an increase. If you are appealing within in a one year of your low decision, you would get continuity to the EED. You may have the basis of a CUE, but personally, I wouldn't be going down that rabbit hole. You have a much better chance of getting the higher and correct rating by new evidence from your doc than to go the legal route of CUE. Others may disagree; you could file a CUE anytime, but the supplemental route is more likely to be successful. Don't even think about the other alternative, HLR; it will not likely get you anything but a a confirmation of their original low ball rating. Be sure to submit using the supplemental VA form 20-0995.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator
8 hours ago, LadyMC said:

I filed a claim. Did a session with a private psychologist and was diagnosed with ptsd. Went to a c and p exam and the examiner did not accurately reflect all of my symptoms. Was given a low rating. Went back to the private psychologist who reviewed my c and p exam paperwork and concluded that one part was inconsistent with another part. He said that VSO scheduled another c and p exam. Just did that one. The va is calling it a request for increase rather than a dispute of the original claim. Below is the letter from the private psychologist after reviewing my case decision   

C1D22C34-9369-48F7-821C-EBE2EC07C447.thumb.jpeg.415f6279d94a0f70cf448bf492017fd7.jpeg
my question ....  they already sent me back pay to the date of my claim but at a much lower rating than the psychologist says I should qualify for.  If it is increased with this latest c and p exam, will I still get back pay for the difference back to my original claim date? 

If I understand your post correctly, it appears that you have a claim pending for decision. Since this new IMO refutes the prior C & P exam and the prior decision, IMHO, you should wait until the VA makes this new decision and then decides what is the best way to get the benefits that you seek.  Since the prior C & P exam marked the criteria that you meet the total occupational and social impairment, it seems that the low rating is the problem and not the prior C & P exam. It is a little confusing and not being able to review what the full C & P exam supports it is hard to say.  If I am wrong or off, please correct me.

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

When the C and P examiner filled out the form he skipped several of the symptoms I listed but did reference them in the criteria section.  I’m sorry but I do not understand all of the acronyms. EED, CUE, HLR ??? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

I agree with @GBArmy and @pacmanx1.

Once you obtain service connection for a disability, your way of contesting it is to file a supplemental (point out what is wrong and provide additional evidence, medical records, etc...) or higher level review or HLR (point out what is wrong, but no additional evidence allowed). The VA used to have a special form to request an increase, but in 2019 they changed it to the new procedure. If you meet the criteria for a higher rating, they should grant it back to the original effective date of your claim.

EED = earlier effective date, or the date your service connected percentage becomes valid.

CUE = clear and unmistakable error, a way to show the VA made specific errors and get them corrected. Must be based on the evidence of record at the time.

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Here is a link to most VA acronyms.

 

https://helpdesk.vetsfirst.org/index.php?pg=kb.page&id=2825

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
6 hours ago, LadyMC said:

When the C and P examiner filled out the form he skipped several of the symptoms I listed but did reference them in the criteria section.  I’m sorry but I do not understand all of the acronyms. EED, CUE, HLR ??? 

Ya, they'll do that.  Not asked, not checked.  Took a NOD and an outside Psychologist IMO, to get it rectified.  Then the VA had me do 3 additional C&P's.  Had a couple of examiners ask directly of the DBQ and filled out properly. Went from 50% to 100% finally. 

Hopefully you understand all my acronyms.  If not, I can clarify.

6 hours ago, LadyMC said:

When the C and P examiner filled out the form he skipped several of the symptoms I listed but did reference them in the criteria section.  I’m sorry but I do not understand all of the acronyms. EED, CUE, HLR ??? 

Ya, they'll do that.  Not asked, not checked.  Took a NOD and an outside Psychologist IMO, to get it rectified.  Then the VA had me do 3 additional C&P's.  Had a couple of examiners ask directly of the DBQ and filled out properly. Went from 50% to 100% finally. 

Hopefully you understand all my acronyms.  If not, I can clarify.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use