Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

VES Pysh Doc put wrong info in P&E exam

Rate this question


gbat

Question

Hi all,

long term lurker, I don't think I would have been service connected without your site. I started a claim in 2014 with VSO, she wanted me to do a fully complete claim, so waited a year to verify stressor, it never came so sent it in anyway. Surprise it got denied. I filed NOD and eventually got my stressor verified by getting navy deck log, buddy statement and vso attached a sick call visit two days after incident.

fast forward five years and rater sent me to VES psych doctor. I was rated 70% PTSD and 10% tinuitus. Afterwards I requested my C-file and after a year received it.

At beginning of interview I mentioned almost fell out of helo, maybe someone shot at us. but not much else. I never mentioned anything about being a combat vet, nor is it written anywhere. he states in his opening remarks that he doesn't need to review incident since I was a combat vet. No I am not. almost three years later and many sick days used for my FMLA PTSD I am retiring early because I can't do my job anymore.

When I go for a TDIU claim and they open my file, I'm afraid they might see opening statement and cut off my VA benefits. Is this possible? the reason why it took so long is I sent in the stressor verifying event, but afraid to go forward. Do I bring that up ( combat Vet) in my statement of the case or ignore it. If I didn't request C-file I would have never knew about it, but now afraid to go forward because of possible VES doctor mistake could doom me.

On a more positive note I'm thinking that the rater waited until the stressor was verified before he sent me to C&P exam. Just don't want to lose all benefits over this, it would ruin me, and turn my life around for the worst. Should I just be happy with what I got? Don't know, wish guy never put that in there, or wish I never requested C-file.

 

thanks for any replies!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Community Owner

IMO I am a 70% rated PTSD Vet after 43 years of this. I think you are being to pardoned. The VA will not look at this or CUE it's self unless you ask it to. DO NOT Beleave the biracks layers or the VSO's that will tell you not to go for UI (or file any more ratings) because the VA will find a reason to reduce your benefits.  Most of it is BS. I would spend some time in the TDIU form and find out how to get that rating. 

You said you are "I am retiring early because I can't do my job anymore." So the question is How are you retiring? Retiring via having enough time in to retire? Appling for SSDI.

If you are going for SSDI make sure you get all the document proof that they or you use to get the SSDI i.e. a PHD report saying you are unemployable due to your PTSD etc. That's what I used to get mine. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Just to add-you mentioned Special Forces and that might mean your MOS was classifiedTop Secret.

In any event the Military assured my daughter, and other similarly classified  Military Personnel, (her MOS was Top Secret ,classified) the VA would declassify anything needed to support a VA claim after their discharge.

This vet apparently was able to prove his TS clearance ,after some time, to the VA:

The Veteran's personnel records show by November 1959 he was en route to his initial assignment at the Maryland Army Chemical Center. One year later, he received a secret security clearance while with the Army Chemical Center. The Veteran's DD 214 listed him as a general clerk. His separation paperwork for the National Guard listed his MOS as Hercules missile crewman and his civilian occupation as dog handler, USP&FO for Maryland."

He was on remand regarding his stressors:

"Contact the RMDA or any other appropriate entity to attempt to verify the Veteran's claimed stressors.  All attempts to verify the Veteran's reported PTSD stressors must be documented in the claims file.  If any records or information sought are unavailable, the AOJ should issue a formal finding documenting such a fact and the reason for the unavailability."

 https://www.va.gov/vetapp21/Files11/21069188.txt

This is why obtaining your Personnel record can be as important as getting your SMRs.

They are critical to any TS Classified MOS claim.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

This is correct. While there are redactions and whatnot, VA does have access to, or the ability to, confirm certain military operations, etc. That being said, a DD214 is not uber top double pinky swear secret either, and much of the time either a combat MOS, or SF MOS shows up on the DD214, along with "remarks" entries RE: hazard pay or imminent danger pay authorized. We don't need to know the whole David Hackworth story breakdown for most things- an area of op, and a unit designator are usually sufficient for what we need. Since we can see awards we can verify combat service that way, too. "Personnel Actions" memos with awards, medal citations, etc, all show up in your OMPF, usually, too. I also see clearances all the time in the initial or renewals of SF86's so that gives me clues also. 

Edited by brokensoldier244th

The Earth is degenerating these days. Bribery and corruption abound.Children no longer mind their parents, every man wants to write a book,and it is evident that the end of the world is fast approaching. --17 different possible sources, all lacking verifiable attribution.

B.S. Doane College, Mgt Info Systems/Systems Analysis 2008

M.S.Ed. Purdue University, Instructional Development and Technology, Feb. 2021

M.S. Purdue University Information Technology/InfoSec, Dec 2022

100% P/T

MDD

Spine

Radiculopathy

Sleep Apnea

Some other stuff

-------------------------------------------
B.S. Info Systems Mgt/Systems Analysis-Doane College 2008
M.S. Instructional Technology and Design- Purdue University 2021

 

(I AM NOT A RATER- I work the claims BEFORE they are rated, annotating medical evidence in your records, VA and Legal documents,  and DA/DD forms- basically a paralegal/vso/etc except that I also evaluate your records based on Caluza and try to justify and schedule the exams that you go to based on whether or not your records have enough in them to warrant those)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
On 12/18/2021 at 7:50 AM, broncovet said:

Ok.  There is a regulation specifically designed to "correct" information in your file that may be wrong.  In summary, you have a right to correct your records, and, the VA must either make those corrections promptly, or send you a letter as to why not within 30 days. 

😛 If a doctor has stuff in your records you dispute as in error, then use this regulation to fix those errors.    IF VA CAnnot/will not correct your records, then you can appeal it and they must tell you how to do this.  REad below.

 There is no reason to suffer through doctors errors, administrative errors, etc.  Instead use this regulation TO THE LETTER:  (I have put in BOLD, very important parts to make this easier to read)

 

 

this post needs to be pinned someplace for easy access....correcting C&P exams with this info is HUGE!!! thanks @broncovet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use