Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Ratings Boards

Rate this question


George2002

Question

I was discharged in 02/1988 from the Army with a 10% disability rating. Have not used the VA until July 2008.

In Oct 2008 I had a C & P exam, using VA doctors. I think the Agent Orange/diabetes is a given (?) at a minimum of 20%. Before I started using the VA, I had private health care insurance. Massive heart, artery, kidney problems through the first 6 months of this year. Advised to file Social Securtiy disability, which I did. Still awaiting an answer. It is my understanding that the heart/artery problems are secondary to the diabetes, which is a result of Agent Orange. Is this correct?

I also had a C & P exam for PTSD, again with a VA shrink. The shrink stated that he was recommending that I be rated at 100% disabled. The stressors are in place, i.e. Bronze Star, Air Medal, CIB, hostile fire, 11C MOS, etc.

My questions are:

After the exam, how long will it take the review board to make a decision?

Does the review board normally take the recommendation of their ratings doctors?

Thanks,

George 2002

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

George:

Welcome to Hadit. As far as your questions your claim will do best when it is developed to meet the criteria that the VA uses to make decisions. You are in the early part of the VA process to review and rate your claim. You need to show a current diagnosis, a link to your Service and that it has caused you problems since your discharge. You can wait till they give you and answer which will be between 6 months and a year and that is a guess. It could be sooner or later also. Its the VA and no one can tell you with any specificity how long your wait is.

If you really want better results than you should work your claim and use VA Language to get the best rating. If you invest some time here Hadit can help you perfect your claim.

From what you have described so far the answer may be No from the VA.

Good Luck

Edited by Pete53

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If you had the heart, kidney and other problems prior to the official diagnosis of DMII the VA is liable to deny service connection for these problems even though there is little doubt of the connection between DMII and these problems. If you get 100% for PTSD then you will be in pretty good shape anyway. You need a doctor's opinion that the heart and other problems are secondary to the DMII. The VA denied my peripheral neuropathy because it proceeded my official DMII diagnosis by the VA. I got around that and so can you with those other problems you have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How can I get around the secondary factors for the heart/artery problems. I had both untreated high blood sugar and high blood pressure/heart problems for several years prior to going to the VA for treatment.

Also, with the VA shrink recommending 100%, does the rating board normally go with the shrinks opinion? We have established the problems since returning from Nam, the stressors that caused the PTSD, etc.

Thanks,

George

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If you have records from private doctors saying you had high glucose levels prior to get dianosed by the VA that would be proof to help connect the secondary conditions. You want to identify the source of those private medical records to the VA so they can obtain them. What you really need is a medical report from a private doctor to say that in his opinion the high glucose levels and your other problems are as likely as not related to undiagnosed DMII. That would be my best guesss. Are your kidney problems from diabetes? That would indicate long standing DMII, but you need a doctor to say that because the VA does not listen to us mortals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Claim all the conditions that you feel are secondary and state way you feel so. Send in some medical literature confirming your thoughts (be careful not to opine but simply refer to medical info as being "standard medical thinking"). That by itself should make your claim plausible and invoke the VAs duty to assist. The easiest way to have a IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use