Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Question About A Recent Decision

Rate this question


CAVMSG

Question

Hello All,

I will attempt to keep this short and to the point.

I filed a claim Oct 07.

Decision dtd 17 Jan 08 Rated 90% for:

Sleep Apnea:50%

PTSD: 30%

BPH 20%

R shoulder: 20%

L shoulder: 10%

C spine: 10%

L spine:10%

L knee: 10%

Tinnitus: 10%

Bl Hearing loss: 0%

hypertension: 0%

residual bunionectomy: 0%

degenerative changes R ankle: 0%

Spent the next 8 months getting IMO's to refute incorrect C&P/ decisions on: C-Spine, PTSD, residual bunionectomy, degenerative changes R ankle, L knee. Submitted a Request for Reconsideration that was received at BVA 27 Oct 08, this was within one year of my Retirement. I was sent for new C&P for all conditions under the request for review. Claim was adjuticated 6 Mar 09:

Decision dated 6 Mar 09 100%

Sleep Apnea: 50%

PTSD: 50%

BPH: 20%

C Spine: 20%

L shoulder: 10%

L spine: 10%

R Shoulder: 20%

Deg change R ankle: 10%

L knee: 10%

Tinnitus: 10%

residual bunionectomy: 10%

BL Hearing loss: 0%

hypertension: 0%

Getting to my question; I received back pay from VA from Nov 08 through Mar09 for the difference between 90% and 100%, there was a note under "What we decided" "We determined that the following service conditions have worsened, so we granted an increase in your assigned percentages" I question this because in my very detailed Request for a review I explaned very well my case, and submitted the IMO documentation that specifically targeted the areas I was refuting, the second set of C&P's obviously upheld those IMO, hence the increases.

Should not the increase been back to the date of my original claim as I requested the review within 1 year of retirement?

Another note that through me slightly was: "We have assigned an effective date of October, which is the date received your claim. Although you filed your claim within one year of discharge from service, the evidence of the record does not indicate your were entitled to an increased evaluation until this date."

I saw a statement in the CFR that spoke about this, is this VBA's out to paying to an earlier effective date? How do you fight this? It seems to me that this is a grey and since I did not get all of my IMO's within a few months of retirement VBA is saying the conditions had gotten worse and not that they were wrong in applying the correct rating in the initial award.

I have already drafted a DRO request, however have not sent it. I do not want to waste my time if the VA law is not on my side, however, I also do not want to go the rest of my life knowing that I know I was right and out over 20,000.

Looking for a little help from the experts on the forum, for the best course of action, DRO review, straight appeal, or do nothing b/c it's a lost cause.

I thank you in advance for your assistance.

CAVMSG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

CAVMSG:

I understand your apprehension to go against the VA and Social Security at the same time, but you will find the Social Security much easier to handle. The way they have set up the system, you just need to hire one of those SSDI lawyers that you see on your TV everyday or look for someone to refer you to a good one in your area. The wait is sometimes stressful, but the reward is getting what you deserve and have earned. It helps pay the bills. Good luck!

s/ Mags

We kept our promise and served honorably. Now it is time for the VA to keep their's!

I am not an attorney or VSO and offer my opinions free of charge. Any advice I provide in my posts is from experiences I have had with the VA or I have the knowledge that others have encoutered. I accept no liability for this advice should you chose to follow it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

When in doubt appeal. I just went from 0% to 60% based on my appeal for a vascular disorder. Not a fact was really different except I got to the DRO with my lawyer. Do you take medications for the HBP? How is your HBP controlled?

I think you should include the 0% for the HBP in your appeal. I don't believe there is any such thing as harmless HBP. Try to get a higher rating for the blood pressure. That is the kind of thing that feeds off PTSD and causes long term damage to heart and kidneys. I take blood pressure meds. I think I am going to file a claim for HBP secondary to DMII. You might want to get a stress test for your heart to see if the HBP has done any damage. You don't know until you keel over dead. You have your 100% and now you want to stay alive to enjoy it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John999,

One thing I left out of my initial post was that at the same time I requested the Review I also submitted claim for, R arm lateral epicondylitis, umbilical hernia, cervical radicuopathy, right arm peripheral neurophathy, as well as ED. All are well grounded in my service records, as well as since retirement. I did not NOD the HBP because while in service and before medication (lisinapril) my BP bottom number was in the high 90's however never in the 10's, since medication now controls it should never encroach those numbers again. I read the CFR under HBP and did not look like I rated more than 0%, if I am mistaken please tell me where to look and I will research.

My rheumatologist is thinking I may have lupus (SLE), lucky (or unlucky for me) this condition is one that has been deemed presumptive and I can certainly demonstrate through medical documentation where it was manefested during the first year following service. I can see I have a long road ahead of me, but and taking it one step at a time.

CAVMSG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use