Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules
- 0
hypertension Question About A Recent Decision
Rate this question
-
Similar Content
-
- 3 answers
- 344 views
-
- 5 answers
- 927 views
-
- 5 answers
- 1,713 views
-
- 11 answers
- 1,137 views
-
VA different higher normal HBP/HTN for vets 1 2
By Dustoff1970,
- blood pressure
- compensation
- (and 2 more)
- 9 answers
- 1,092 views
-
Question
CAVMSG
Hello All,
I will attempt to keep this short and to the point.
I filed a claim Oct 07.
Decision dtd 17 Jan 08 Rated 90% for:
Sleep Apnea:50%
PTSD: 30%
BPH 20%
R shoulder: 20%
L shoulder: 10%
C spine: 10%
L spine:10%
L knee: 10%
Tinnitus: 10%
Bl Hearing loss: 0%
hypertension: 0%
residual bunionectomy: 0%
degenerative changes R ankle: 0%
Spent the next 8 months getting IMO's to refute incorrect C&P/ decisions on: C-Spine, PTSD, residual bunionectomy, degenerative changes R ankle, L knee. Submitted a Request for Reconsideration that was received at BVA 27 Oct 08, this was within one year of my Retirement. I was sent for new C&P for all conditions under the request for review. Claim was adjuticated 6 Mar 09:
Decision dated 6 Mar 09 100%
Sleep Apnea: 50%
PTSD: 50%
BPH: 20%
C Spine: 20%
L shoulder: 10%
L spine: 10%
R Shoulder: 20%
Deg change R ankle: 10%
L knee: 10%
Tinnitus: 10%
residual bunionectomy: 10%
BL Hearing loss: 0%
hypertension: 0%
Getting to my question; I received back pay from VA from Nov 08 through Mar09 for the difference between 90% and 100%, there was a note under "What we decided" "We determined that the following service conditions have worsened, so we granted an increase in your assigned percentages" I question this because in my very detailed Request for a review I explaned very well my case, and submitted the IMO documentation that specifically targeted the areas I was refuting, the second set of C&P's obviously upheld those IMO, hence the increases.
Should not the increase been back to the date of my original claim as I requested the review within 1 year of retirement?
Another note that through me slightly was: "We have assigned an effective date of October, which is the date received your claim. Although you filed your claim within one year of discharge from service, the evidence of the record does not indicate your were entitled to an increased evaluation until this date."
I saw a statement in the CFR that spoke about this, is this VBA's out to paying to an earlier effective date? How do you fight this? It seems to me that this is a grey and since I did not get all of my IMO's within a few months of retirement VBA is saying the conditions had gotten worse and not that they were wrong in applying the correct rating in the initial award.
I have already drafted a DRO request, however have not sent it. I do not want to waste my time if the VA law is not on my side, however, I also do not want to go the rest of my life knowing that I know I was right and out over 20,000.
Looking for a little help from the experts on the forum, for the best course of action, DRO review, straight appeal, or do nothing b/c it's a lost cause.
I thank you in advance for your assistance.
CAVMSG
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
4
2
2
1
Popular Days
Apr 5
10
Apr 6
1
Top Posters For This Question
CAVMSG 4 posts
Berta 2 posts
mags1023 2 posts
Pete53 1 post
Popular Days
Apr 5 2009
10 posts
Apr 6 2009
1 post
10 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now