Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

I Won! I Won! After A Four Year And Five Day Battle!

Rate this question


jamescripps2

Question

On November 2, 2009, I won the first ever VA claim for Agent Orange exposure, "inside the Continental United States." The claim was granted for Chloracne, Diabetes and Heart Disease with ICD implant, as due to Agent Orange exposure at Fort Gordon GA., in the years 1967-1969. You will be able to read the Board Of Veterans Appeals detailed decision along with the supporting evidence at WWW.va.gov in a couple of months when it is posted. From the web site choose Board of Veterans Appeals, then click on Decisions. Next type in the search box Docket No.08-11 937.

Due to the AICD implant, Class 3 CHF and a LVEF of 25% there should be a 100% P&T award.

Other than a $15.00 Medicare copay, here and there, no money was spent on an IMO, so take heart, you don't have to be rich to win!

James M. Cripps,

Vietnam Veterans OF America Tennessee Agent Orange Committee Chairman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

This is a BIGGIE!

They also awarded AO in Alaska (I posted that here-decision came -get this- from the AMC!)

but this is within continental USA!!!!!

Mike I was thinking the same thing-ischemic heart disease-which is already added to the AO presumptives.

Now I wonder how many pending vet's claims do show ischemic heart disease that VA would have to consider under this new presumptive---but I fear VAROs will not even take the new reg into account if they can deny the claims under a different basis.

I know the BVA would.

I sent Larry Scott this news-=hope he posts it-

this is BIG for the veteran's community-

and proves as James said here at hadit I think-

PERSISTENCE pays off-

If you have the evidence you MUST persist until you get the right decision.

My award was first of it's kind too-1151 rendered moot by direct AO SC-

It went on the BVA web site fairly quickly-

so this award James got might not take too long to be posted there.

INCREDIBLE!1!!!!!!!!!!!!

and NOTHING is impossible with the VA.

DOD has confirmed testing of AO in many spots in the US of A-----I posted that info here many times over the years - but I never saw any vet succeed like James did.

This is a major victory for vets as many claiming USA exposure might have a chance now to prove their cases if they can prove they were in the testing itself or maybe had duty in same area after testing was done.

I bet they used AO around officers quarters and the golf courses as well as in war game scenarios.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

past discussion here at hadit:

http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?show...hl=jamescripps2

there are links there that might help someone else put there

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

James, I too remember your battle. You are an inspiration to other Vets who have had AO exposure in the CONUS.

I see a 100 percent P and T with the EF of 25. I believe an SMC is also in store.

Enjoy the award and take care of yourself.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
This is a BIGGIE!

They also awarded AO in Alaska (I posted that here-decision came -get this- from the AMC!)

but this is within continental USA!!!!!

Mike I was thinking the same thing-ischemic heart disease-which is already added to the AO presumptives.

Now I wonder how many pending vet's claims do show ischemic heart disease that VA would have to consider under this new presumptive---but I fear VAROs will not even take the new reg into account if they can deny the claims under a different basis.

I know the BVA would.

I sent Larry Scott this news-=hope he posts it-

this is BIG for the veteran's community-

and proves as James said here at hadit I think-

PERSISTENCE pays off-

If you have the evidence you MUST persist until you get the right decision.

My award was first of it's kind too-1151 rendered moot by direct AO SC-

It went on the BVA web site fairly quickly-

so this award James got might not take too long to be posted there.

INCREDIBLE!1!!!!!!!!!!!!

and NOTHING is impossible with the VA.

DOD has confirmed testing of AO in many spots in the US of A-----I posted that info here many times over the years - but I never saw any vet succeed like James did.

This is a major victory for vets as many claiming USA exposure might have a chance now to prove their cases if they can prove they were in the testing itself or maybe had duty in same area after testing was done.

I bet they used AO around officers quarters and the golf courses as well as in war game scenarios.

I agree Berta this is HUGE Berta what if they used already standing decisons that link AO diabetes 2 to cardiac and SC as secondary to DM2 and the Shinseki new presumptive ruling has nothing to do with this decision we may be getting the horse before the cart it is still a great win as being the first known case of AO awarded from AO use in the United States but the nexus maybe the same that BVA has been awarding to Nam vets for a long time we need to read the decision to learn the full extent

Edited by Testvet

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

That is great news. Now does the new reg for heart disease make an opening for widows to file DIC if their RVN spouses died from heart disease 5 years ago? If the VA grants an AO claim for CONUS I think the walls may be coming down on a lot of other AO claims for navy and others. It is sort of like the Berlin Wall. Once one brick is knocked down the whole wall may come down. We RVN vets are not getting any younger. I was at Ft Stewart and Ft Benning. Did they use AO there as well?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use