Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

I Don't Know Whether To Be P*ssed Or Confused!

Rate this question


Shark

Question

I just received an IRIS response to my request to find out the status of my appeal and new claim, here it is:

Response (Department of Veterans Affairs) 11/09/2009 12:20 PM Dear Mr. xxxxxxx:

This is in response to your inquiry dated November 6, 2009, regarding the status of your appeal and your claim for increase.

Mr. xxxxxxxxx, we thank you for your service to our country and the sacrifices you have made for our freedom.

Our records indicate that we received your Notice of Disagreement on October 28, 2008, for your appeal seeking entitlement to Individual Unemployability (IU). You originally selected a Decision Review Officer to make a decision on your appeal but switched to the Traditional Process appeal on December 11, 2008. We show that your file has been sent for an examination for your appeal. You will be notified by U.S. mail of the date, time, and location of the examination.

The appeals process can be a very lengthy and time consuming process. Appeals are worked in the order in which they are received. We suggest that you stay in touch with your Power of Attorney, Disabled American Veterans. They are very knowledgeable and helpful with the appeals process.

We show that your claim for increase was opened on July 9, 2009, for hypertension secondary to Diabetes Mellitus Type II with foot ulcers and Gastroesphageal Reflux Disease. It is currently being reviewed to make sure all of the necessary development is completed. Once that is done, your claim will be forwarded to the rating team where a rating specialist will review all of the evidence and make a decision. From there, your claim will go to the post-determination team where they will make sure everything is in order before sending you a letter by U.S. mail, notifying you whether benefits were granted or denied.

We appreciate your patience during these processing procedures. Be assured that we are working as quickly as possible to make a fair determination on your appeal and your claim for increase.

Thank you for contacting us. If you have questions or need additional help with the information in our reply, please respond to this message or see our other contact information below.

Sincerely yours,

E.J. Kruse

National IRIS Response Center Manager

Now the strange part...I asked to be changed back to the DRO process in January of this year. In July I submitted a new claim for hypertension and GERD. In August I received a letter from the DRO that the application for IU was considered a request for an increase in all disabilities. C&P's were scheduled for September. The PTSD follow-up exam stated for an increase and unemployability. The Psychiatrist stated:

"Claimant is unemployable due especially to irritability and poor concentration." She then went into her rationale for that statement. She also provided evidence that should have me at the 70-100% rating for PTSD.

Then I also had a medical C&P in September where the doc stated that "at least as likely as not" that I was service connected for hypertension and GERD.

Now I get the second part where they are in development of the new claim, but why would they want to do another examination for the PTSD? Could it be that they did not like the results of the first exam and are going out for another opinion?

I know...I should be out fishing and not worrying about this!

Vietnam 66, 67/68. Combat Aircrewman doing search and rescue in N Vietnam. HS-6

Combat Vets Association

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Be damn sure that your DRO is going to happen. When you start to change things the VA gets confused. They may be actually waiting to certify your claim to the BVA. I would double check this. It happened to me. I asked for a DRO Hearing and the VA was in the process of certifying my claim to the BVA when I stopped them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shark,

I thought I read here that if your C&P is more than 1 year old the request a new one. It looks like your ordeal has been going on for a little more than a year. I am sure one of the experts can shed more light on it my DRO process is approching 1 year and I expect to have a new exam.

Good luck

Edited by kw34
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Waiting one year for a DRO is not a long time. What you want to be sure of it that you are indeed in line for a DRO Review or Hearing. You cannot just trust them. I would verify it if I had to go down to the VARO on foot. They should have sent you a letter saying they acknowledge that you are going the DRO route in lieu of a BVA appeal. If you change your mind in the middle of the process watch out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you contact your VSO to find out what is going on with your claim..They can sign out your claim and read what's going on with it/where it is in the process...(The VSO at the VARO that is). You have to keep on top of them all the time!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would suspect that they did not see the C&P exams had already occured. Apparently you file is processing to go to the appeals section for determination. Once that determination is made then it goes to thr review board. The 1-800 number people can usually at least tell you where the claim is i.e. what stage of the process. Workup - Determination, or Review. Sounds like your is still in workup for some reason. The C&P may be for some other issue as well, not related to the appeal directly. Who knows really, the 1-800 people can tell you if you have any C&P's pending normally as well but you have to make sure and tell them this is an appeal, and not a new claim - different screens.

Bob

Bob Smith

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use