Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Ssdi Not Just For Sc Problems; Does It Kill Tdiu Hopes?

Rate this question


acesup

Question

I got SSDI awarded in 2004. Now I'm filing for TDIU. But...

The SSDI is for my SC diability AND some non-SC issues.

Will VA use the non-SC stuff to just deny my TDIU, or are they supposed to give benefit of doubt, in that the SC disability is the major problem that put me out of work?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Generally they will pick up on any NSC issues to avoid paying and I would plan on that. You'll probably need to counter, their denial, w/evidence that your SC disability causes you TDIU, in and of itself. They always look for a way not to pay and other NSC disabilities are a perfect way to avoid payment. Then they hope you give up.

pr

I got SSDI awarded in 2004. Now I'm filing for TDIU. But...

The SSDI is for my SC diability AND some non-SC issues.

Will VA use the non-SC stuff to just deny my TDIU, or are they supposed to give benefit of doubt, in that the SC disability is the major problem that put me out of work?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The VA cannot take into consideration any NSC disabilities unless the claimant is applying for NSC pension. They generally will always request they be separated so as to determine whether the SC condition(s) are the cause the of the TDIU. If they did consider the NSC disabilities, I'd worry about the VA calling a CUE on themselves and facing a probable reduction, at some future date.

pr

it helped me ,i had 6 issues 2 sc but you have toohave sc be the worst,good luck.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Any medical record you give them that includes NSC issues presents a problem for you. Not just SSD records, but any records. When you apply for IU the VA will scan your NSC conditions and often come to the conclusion that these are the real reasons you can't work. It happened to me. I had to go back and get another medical opinion to clarify that the SC conditions were the ones that kept me from working. Money and time!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

aceup...

SSDI is 100% disabled or 0% disabled.

If your sc disabilities are a chunk of the pie for your SSDI claim and you meet all the

TDIU rules, I'd go for it. If you don't try you'll have a 100% chance of not getting it.

If you do, your chances are at least 50/50.

Those nsc issues are a snag in the line.

As an example, my husband filed a claim with VA in '02, received sc in '08 at 70%

Filed for SSDI because he could no longer perform and never would be able to again the

job he is trained to do and, due to nsc disabilities (currently on appeal, not yet sc),

he filed for SSDI. They saw him at 100% disabled 1st go around. When the decision

came back from VA on the TDIU, they denied. Why? Because part of the reason he is

no longer able to work is because of the issue on appeal but....it it's not sc yet.

If he does end up getting it sc, then we could refile...but, my hunch is that if he were sc

for it it, it would pull him over the 100% mark anyway and TDIU would be a moot subject

as he medically is permanently and totally disabled.

Definetly get those quacking ducks in a row and if you meet the criteria, file.

Edited by VetsLady

VetsLady and, Proud to Be

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use