Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Great News And

Rate this question


Berta

Question

VA has awarded me the refund of my FTCA offset.

Also REPS just told me my REPS application was approved.

But-the VA is trying to say that since my husband didn't know he had heart disease and diabetes (although they agree he did have these AO conditions) therefore he did not claim them in his lifetime and thus they wont apply Nehmer to my EED for DIC.

Say what? They failed to consider he was MISDIAGNOSED for 6 years (documented)and this is why he didnt know he had DMII and CAD-

The decision on this is an interesting read-I will ask them to CUE themselves again- it worked on their last two faulty award letters and I am appalled at their vastly faulty logic in this decision-

the odd thing is that when an AO vet dies- it is the claims of their survivor that determine DIC-and the VA failed to even mention my DIC claims.

But I have most of the monkey off my back on my issues-

and find I still have a little battle here to go-

I cant wait to prepare my response- they really bared their A-- on this one and maybe I can use it to get the IG into Buffalo with it-

something is really wrong at that VARO-and I sure can't be the only one who is getting these ridiculous decisions.

I could even raise the IHD issue too- when I ask them to CUE themselves for the third time since April.

More of us should be requesting that they CUE themselves -if their decision contains critical legal errors.

It has worked for me many times to get a faster response from them.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

unbelievable - the idiots! That's like saying that a vet who had his leg blown off and didn't know because of shock still had two legs!!!

Put your sparring gloves back on Berta!

"Do one thing every day that scares you." Eleanor Roosevelt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Berta congrats on good news and you know the drill for the stupidity

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

VA has awarded me the refund of my FTCA offset.

Also REPS just told me my REPS application was approved.

But-the VA is trying to say that since my husband didn't know he had heart disease and diabetes (although they agree he did have these AO conditions) therefore he did not claim them in his lifetime and thus they wont apply Nehmer to my EED for DIC.

Say what? They failed to consider he was MISDIAGNOSED for 6 years (documented)and this is why he didnt know he had DMII and CAD-

The decision on this is an interesting read-I will ask them to CUE themselves again- it worked on their last two faulty award letters and I am appalled at their vastly faulty logic in this decision-

the odd thing is that when an AO vet dies- it is the claims of their survivor that determine DIC-and the VA failed to even mention my DIC claims.

But I have most of the monkey off my back on my issues-

and find I still have a little battle here to go-

I cant wait to prepare my response- they really bared their A-- on this one and maybe I can use it to get the IG into Buffalo with it-

something is really wrong at that VARO-and I sure can't be the only one who is getting these ridiculous decisions.

I could even raise the IHD issue too- when I ask them to CUE themselves for the third time since April.

More of us should be requesting that they CUE themselves -if their decision contains critical legal errors.

It has worked for me many times to get a faster response from them.

Berta,

Congrats, unfortunately with the VA nothing seems to go smoothly. Even when faced with undisputable evidence they still try to fight it. I know that you will handle this with no problems, "Give-em-Hell", Miss Berta!!!

Bergie

As a combat veteran, or any veteran for that matter!!!

If you thought the fighting was over when you came home, got out, or when the politicians said it was over.

Welcome to the real fight, welcome to VA claims!!!

"Just sayin"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Berta

I have a question...would you ask them to "Cue" themselves when the decision is still within the one year appeal period? I guess you are suggesting a "request to cue themselves" works better than a NOD or a Motion for Reconsideration.

I guess what I dont understand is that CUE is a more difficult standard than a typical NOD, so it is unclear the advantage of them Cue ing themselves. Thanks..Bronco

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Congratulations Berta, No matter how bittersweet the VA has tried to make it for you. I hope this latest round with the VA has lightened your burden. Your resolve to seek equity is inspiring. Your efforts will help countless widows, veterans and their families, in the future. As I read your post, on this cold wintry day, and along with my best wishes, I am reminded of Robert Frost's words, "The woods are lovely, dark and deep. But I have promises to keep, And miles to go before I sleep,... ". my most positive thoughts are with you.

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use