Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

I Don't Qualify For Ssi

Rate this question


reddog

Question

I applied or SSI or tried to apply but was turned down because I haven't worked in over 12 years. Now that I'm 62. I applied retirement, Social Security, but I also have a claim for unemployability with the VA. I am 70% PTSD, 20% diabetes, 10% in each leg for neuropathy and 10% for tendinitis, which makes a total off 80%. When I applied for Social Security retirement. The man stated that I said the reason I didn't apply for SSI that I was not disabled. Have been trying to contact the Social Security office to see if this can be changed. I hope that this does not affect my application for disability with the VA.. Any thoughts on this would be helpful.

My claim has been in sence March 30, 2010. They deferred the decision on individual unemployability claim is in the decision phase now was hoping to hear something before Christmas times are tough and hard here. Merry Christmas to all and a happy new year and good luck to everyone that is waiting a claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

reddog - First off, at 80% SC, you receive too much money for SSI, which is like welfare. You need to apply for both Social Security Disability Insurance(SSDI), with your disability onset date being the day after the last day you worked, 12 yrs ago. You should also apply for Social Security Retirement(SSR) at age 62yo. You should receive SSR quickly and your claim for SSDI will be processed. If you win SSDI, they will recover what they've paid in SSR and pay you the full rate for SSDI. jmo

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please clarify whether you applied for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits or Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits (though, an application for SSDI is inherently an application for SSI). If you applied for SSI only, your VA compensation payments likely make you ineligible for that program.

As for the comment about not being disabled ... there is disability for Social Security benefits purposes and disability for VA purposes. While in many - or most - cases, the definitions of disability can be the same .... t'ain't always so. Proving inability to work for SS purposes might be difficult because you haven't worked in 12 years - why are you now disabled?

And, did you apply for SSDI/SSI, or were you talked out of it? DId you male a formal application?

As you are now 62, you can apply for "regular" early SS benefits. The benefit will be reduced because you are taking benefits early and because your contributions have been lacking over the past 12 years.

I applied or SSI or tried to apply but was turned down because I haven't worked in over 12 years. Now that I'm 62. I applied retirement, Social Security, but I also have a claim for unemployability with the VA. I am 70% PTSD, 20% diabetes, 10% in each leg for neuropathy and 10% for tendinitis, which makes a total off 80%. When I applied for Social Security retirement. The man stated that I said the reason I didn't apply for SSI that I was not disabled. Have been trying to contact the Social Security office to see if this can be changed. I hope that this does not affect my application for disability with the VA.. Any thoughts on this would be helpful.

My claim has been in sence March 30, 2010. They deferred the decision on individual unemployability claim is in the decision phase now was hoping to hear something before Christmas times are tough and hard here. Merry Christmas to all and a happy new year and good luck to everyone that is waiting a claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please clarify whether you applied for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits or Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits (though, an application for SSDI is inherently an application for SSI). If you applied for SSI only, your VA compensation payments likely make you ineligible for that program.

As for the comment about not being disabled ... there is disability for Social Security benefits purposes and disability for VA purposes. While in many - or most - cases, the definitions of disability can be the same .... t'ain't always so. Proving inability to work for SS purposes might be difficult because you haven't worked in 12 years - why are you now disabled?

And, did you apply for SSDI/SSI, or were you talked out of it? DId you male a formal application?

As you are now 62, you can apply for "regular" early SS benefits. The benefit will be reduced because you are taking benefits early and because your contributions have been lacking over the past 12 years.

I did not formally apply for Social Security only went to the Social Security office to see if I qualified for any type Social Security. The girl looked at my Social Security number and said that I do not qualify for any Social Security since I was drawing VA disability and I have not earned enough. So I applied last week for Social Security retirement received a letter from Social Security office and it said that I did not apply for SSI because I am not disabled. I called back and talk to the man who took my application over the phone. He said that it was just a formality, and it would be okay just to leave it as is. I asked him if we could change it to not qualify for SSI and he said no. When I went to the Social Security office the first time It had been about three or four years since I first talked to the Social Security office.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did not formally apply for Social Security only went to the Social Security office to see if I qualified for any type Social Security. The girl looked at my Social Security number and said that I do not qualify for any Social Security since I was drawing VA disability and I have not earned enough. So I applied last week for Social Security retirement received a letter from Social Security office and it said that I did not apply for SSI because I am not disabled. I called back and talk to the man who took my application over the phone. He said that it was just a formality, and it would be okay just to leave it as is. I asked him if we could change it to not qualify for SSI and he said no. When I went to the Social Security office the first time It had been about three or four years since I first talked to the Social Security office.

I would ask to have it changed. You might want to put in a written request asking that the information be changed. You might even want to acknowledge that they told you it was just a formality and it could be left as is, but that you would prefer that records a government agency has about you be accurate.

That doesn't necessarily mean they will change it. But it does mean you have a paper trail if that comes back to bite you.

Does the letter say anything about appealing - or a "you have 10 days to request corrections" - or anything like that on it?

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

reddog - I repeat what I stated previously. jmo

pr

reddog - First off, at 80% SC, you receive too much money for SSI, which is like welfare. You need to apply for both Social Security Disability Insurance(SSDI), with your disability onset date being the day after the last day you worked, 12 yrs ago. You should also apply for Social Security Retirement(SSR) at age 62yo. You should receive SSR quickly and your claim for SSDI will be processed. If you win SSDI, they will recover what they've paid in SSR and pay you the full rate for SSDI. jmo

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

reddog - I repeat what I stated previously. jmo

pr

I agree. You certainly have the right to apply for benefits before a decision is made in regard to whether or not you are entitled to them. Sometimes they try to short cut it and tell you that you can't apply because you are not entitled. The decision as to whether you are entitled should come after you apply for benefits; not before.

In my husband's case, he was told he could not apply because he was no longer insured. His last date insured was December 2005 and he was applying in (I think it was) May 2006. But the question was not whether he was insured the day he applied. The question was whether his disability started while he was still insured. We talked them into letting him apply to see if he could be considered disabled back in December 2005 (when he stopped working) or August 2005 (when his his income dropped below substantial gainful). They processed his claim and he was approved 3 weeks later. (That was kind of fast, but they processed it as a "TERI" claim due to his terminal illness.)

I am certainly glad we didn't just listen to them and not even try to apply because they told us it was too late to apply.

In my case, I had to fight to apply. I was trying to apply for Mother's benefits after my husband's death. They kept telling me I could not apply because I was not eligible. They tried to tell me that an adult child has to be physically disabled to be considered to be "in your care," and that Mother's benefits are not applicable if the adult child has a mental disability, rather than a physical one. This is not in compliance with the law. Mothers who have mentally disabled adult children in their care are very much entitled to Mother's Benefits. But I couldn't seem to convince them of that. (And yes, they tried to say I didn't try to apply for Mother's Benefits).

When I received my Lump Sum Death Benefit award letter - which stated I was not entitled to any other benefit - I appealed that - and stated I wanted to be provided with the opportunity to apply for Mother's Benefits before a decision was made as to whether or not I was entitled to them. They allowed me to apply, and I was eventually awarded benefits. It took a long time because they seemed to be dead set on not granting me the benefits, despite the fact I was eligible for them. (Thank God for the ALJ and the Appeals Council!!!!)

Once again, I am glad I didn't just listen to them and not even try to apply.

So my point is - You should apply for any and all benefits to which you think you might be entitled. The decision as to whether or not you are entitled should not be made until you have actually filled out an application, had your claim developed, and been afforded full protection of the law - including the right to appeal adverse decisions made on your claim.

Edited by free_spirit_etc
Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use