Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

What Is The Definition Of ".............."

Rate this question


bigmuny

Question

For a SAH grant I am trying to find the definition of "residuals of organic disease or injury"...Does anyone know the VA legal, statutory or technical definition of this..in simple terms that is...???

I have an appeal in the works...somewhere, from a SAH claim filed in 2007 and a higher level of Aid and Attendance filed in 2008 and I appealed in Feb. 2012 but now

the BVA says my claim was closed out on April 20, 2012 b/c of not filing in time..been through this with them once already and thought we cleared it up..but nay. I have all the paperwork and certified mail receipts and my VSO rep is the one who submitted it...so now the RO is writing an internal memo to reopen the claim based on it was filed in time.

However, by some chance back in Oct 2010 a claim was filed for me by someone, maybe me, for a host of contentions..the only thing I remember doing was writing a letter to my VSO rep complaining why the RO in deciding my SAH and higher AA claim did not consider the Dr.(s) evaluation concering my present level of disability, for instance loss of use of both legs and arm, incontinence, loss of bowel control, peripheral neuropathy, diabetic neuropathy, loss of memory, depression and anxiety, edema in lower legs, varicose veins, malaise, weakness, lethargy, nausea, high blood pressure/hypertension..all of these things were evaluated by the Doctors who submitted their findings to the RO but the RO never heard any of these claims..so it is either the letter I wrote complaining about it or the VSO filed it for me or the RO took it under consideration as a new claim. Now I have my answer to that claim

and they raised me from 70% to 100% for PTSD and raised me from 10% to 60% for incontinence, increased from 20% to 40% for DJD and increase my AA from an L rate to

an L 1/2 rate..plus what gets me is they deny me for loss of use of legs but yet

further on in their decision they grant me 40% for paralysis of the left lower extremity radiculopathy based on moderately severe incomplete paralysis....Now what does that mean??? That I can walk now b/c my paralysis is incomplete??? Then someone tell my legs...It's the jargon that confuses me. The VA has bought me Walkers, canes, wheelchairs and a beautiful electric wheelchair with a ramp and a wheelchair lift, only thing is I can't use it in the house b/c it is not equipped for wheelchair accessibility, hence the SAH grant.

Now that I have a P&T 100% rating plus an independent 60% rating does that open any avenues for increases in anything else. Like an automobile grant, not that I would

drive but it would sure make it easier to make my appointments, as of now I have to contact an independent medical transport to come get me and bring me back and they

are cheap, but if I had a van someone could drive me and my wheelchair to my appts.

Also, can I use this new claim and the increases as evidence in my appeals or will the BVA automatically see it without me submitting it??

Thanks for any assistance, advice or help anyone can offer..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

The SAH grant criteria goes a little beyond that statement.

“Under applicable criteria, VA is authorized to assist any

veteran who is entitled to disability compensation for the

loss of use of one lower extremity together with residuals of

organic disease or injury, or the loss of use of one upper

extremity, which so affect the functions of balance or

propulsion as to preclude locomotion without the aid of

braces, crutches, canes or a wheelchair, in acquiring a

suitable housing unit with special fixtures or movable

facilities made necessary by the nature of the veteran's

disability and necessary land therefore, or in remodeling a

dwelling to meet those requirements. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 2101,

2102. “

I assume they mean that in your case, possibly the diabetic neuropathy, or in other cases maybe peripheral arterial disease, , and /or evidence of organic brain trauma from it (as in a veteran who had a major stroke causing them loss of use of extremities) would be considered residuals of organic disease and injury as compared to a mental health disability.

organic disease one associated with demonstrable change in a bodily organ or tissue. “

from:http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/organic+disease

“in their decision they grant me 40% for paralysis of the left lower extremity radiculopathy based on moderately severe incomplete paralysis....Now what does that mean??? “

It means they did consider the percentage of disability, and I would think this is proof of residuals of organic disability.

You stated:

“I have an appeal in the works...somewhere, from a SAH claim filed in 2007 and a higher level of Aid and Attendance filed in 2008 and I appealed in Feb. 2012 but now

the BVA says my claim was closed out on April 20, 2012 b/c of not filing in time..been through this with them once already and thought we cleared it up..but nay. I have all the paperwork and certified mail receipts and my VSO rep is the one who submitted it...so now the RO is writing an internal memo to reopen the claim based on it was filed in time. “

and

“Also, can I use this new claim and the increases as evidence in my appeals or will the BVA automatically see it without me submitting it?? “

I hope , as how I understand all this, that VA will consider this claim as still a pending one (from either 2007 (I assume you mean this was a formal SAH application) or pending from 2008 for a higher level A & A claim or both as I don't think it is technically on appeal yet due to the apparent VA error of saying something wasn't timely filed...That is what your VSO is attempting to clear up. I think.

I hope others will chime in here because I am confused by this post.

But not confused about this:

“will the BVA automatically see it without me submitting it? “

I dont know what you mean by :”it” but I would never depend on any VA entity, VARO or the BVA to “automatically” act on anything .

One more point:

"loss of use of both legs and arm, incontinence, loss of bowel control, peripheral neuropathy, diabetic neuropathy, loss of memory, depression and anxiety, edema in lower legs, varicose veins, malaise, weakness, lethargy, nausea, high blood pressure/hypertension..all of these things were evaluated by the Doctors who submitted their findings to the RO but the" ….....

Were all of these formally claimed?

VA usually will not act on anything not formally claimed, unless they have significant evidence that allows them to infer an issue.

The VA might have considered all of above in your decision already but hard to know.

The vet rep would know.

I might be misinterpreting this whole post so I sure hope others will chime in.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use