Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules
- 0
Obesity Now Recognized As A Disease By The Ama
Rate this question
-
Similar Content
-
- 0 comments
- 958 views
-
- 0 replies
- 338 views
-
- 2 answers
- 218 views
-
- 3 answers
- 320 views
-
- 0 replies
- 359 views
-
Question
militarynurse
Seems the VA can on occasion consider obesity merely as a "symptom"* and perhaps even the type of symptom that the VA alleges is caused by the Veteran's own willful misconduct of overeating or being inactive so it can deny the claim. However, since the American Medical Association ( AMA ) recently in June of 2013 has officially declared that "obesity is a disease", might that allow disabled veterans whose service connected condition(s) led to excessive weight gain to now find more success claiming obesity as a ratable secondary medical condition or a disease aggravated by the Veteran's service connected condition(s)?
*"Obesity
Service connection is not warranted for obesity. Claiming
service connection for obesity amounts to claiming service
connection for a symptom, rather than for an underlying
disease or injury which may have caused the symptom. In this
respect, obesity, in and of itself, is not a disability for
which service connection may be granted.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
(Federal Circuit) has defined "injury" as "damage
inflicted on the body by an external force." See Terry v.
Principi, 340 F.3d 1378, 1384 (Fed. Cir. 2003), citing
Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary 901 (29th Ed. 2000).
Thus, obesity caused by overeating or lack of exercise is the
result of the veteran's own behavior, and as such is not an
"injury" as defined for VA purposes. See Terry v.
Principi, 340 F.3d 1378, 1384 (Fed. Cir. 2003) (defining
"injury" as "damage inflicted on the body by an external
force").
The Federal Circuit also defined "disease" as "any
deviation from or interruption of the normal structure or
function of a part, organ, or system of the body." Terry,
340 F.3d at 1384, citing Dorland's at 511. Obesity that is
not due to an underlying pathology cannot be considered to be
due to "disease," defined as "any deviation from or
interruption of the normal structure or function of a part,
organ or system of the body." Id. The body's normal
storage of calories for future use represents the body
working at what it is designed to do. It is well settled
that symptoms alone, without a finding of an underlying
disorder, cannot be service-connected. See Sanchez-Benitez
v. Principi, 259 F.3d 1356 (Fed. Cir. 2001)." - from a BVA 2009 Decision
---and---
"Obesity or being overweight, a particularity of body type,
alone, is not considered a disability for which service
connection may be granted. See generally 38 C.F.R. Part 4
(VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities) (2009) (does not
contemplate a separate disability rating for obesity).
Rather, applicable VA regulations use the term "disability"
to refer to the average impairment in earning capacity
resulting from diseases or injuries encountered as a result
of or incident to military service. Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet.
App. 439, 448 (1995); Hunt v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 292, 296
(1991); 38 C.F.R. § 4.1 (2009). The question is thus whether
the current obesity is a disability-i.e. a condition causing
impairment in earning capacity. In this case, there is no
such evidence.
The veteran has not asserted that obesity causes impairment
of earning capacity; instead he asserts that his obesity has
caused other disabilities to manifest. There is also no
other evidence that the claimed obesity is a disability.
Inasmuch as the Veteran does not have a disability manifested
by obesity and obesity is not a disease or disability for
which service connection may be granted, the Board concludes
that obesity was not incurred in or aggravated by service and
may not be presumed to have been so incurred. This claim is
not in relative equipoise; therefore, the Veteran may not be
afforded the benefit of the doubt in the resolution thereof.
Rather, as a preponderance of the evidence is against the
claim, it must be denied. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(b) (West 2002)" - from a 2010 BVA Decision
But didn't the VA as early as 2006 already characterize obesity as a disease?
"Obesity is a complex and chronic disease that develops from an interaction between the individual’s
genotype and the environment." - http://www.healthquality.va.gov/obesity/obe06_final1.pdf
"The AMA's decision essentially makes diagnosis and treatment of obesity a physician's professional obligation." - Los Angeles Times
http://www.today.com/health/obesity-disease-doctors-group-says-6C10371394
Edited by militarynurseLink to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
6
3
2
2
Popular Days
Jun 25
9
Jun 24
7
Jun 26
2
Aug 29
1
Top Posters For This Question
john999 6 posts
militarynurse 3 posts
Stretch 2 posts
Papa 2 posts
Popular Days
Jun 25 2013
9 posts
Jun 24 2013
7 posts
Jun 26 2013
2 posts
Aug 29 2018
1 post
Popular Posts
71M10
Since when has the VA allowed Science to effect its policies.
18 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now