Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Possible Cue

Rate this question


vern2

Question

I have reviewed my VA claim from 03-07 and noted a possible CUE.

I was awarded 30 SC based on aggravated hypertension "with confirmed dilation of the heart"

The exact wording is: we have evaluated the condition analogous to hypertensive heart disease based on the fact that you have associated pulmonary hypertension with confirmed evidence of dilation of the heart. this is more advantageous to your as your hypertension would be evaluated as 10 per cent disabling. An evaluation of 30 per cent is assigned is there is workload greated than 5 METS but not greater than 7 METS resulting in dyspnea, fatigue, anginia, diziness, or syncope; or evidence of cardiac hypertrophy or dillatation on electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, or X-ray. A higher evaluation of 40 percent is not warranted unless diastolic pressure is predominantly 120 or more. A higher evaluation of 60 per cent is not warraanted unless there is more than one episode of acute congestive heart failure in the past year; or workload greater than 3 METS, but not greater than 5 METS resulting in dyspnea, fatigue, anginia, diziness, or syncope; or left ventricular dysfunction with an ejection fraction of 30 to 50 per cent. One MET (metabolic equivalent) is the energy cost of standing quietly at rest and represents an oxygen uptake of 3.5 milliliters per kilogram of body weight per minute.

I was granted 30% according to rating guidelines during my active service with approximatley one year of uncontgrolled pressures with the subsequent development of pulmonary hypertension with cardiac hypertrophy.

A review of the evidence submitted shows that an echocardiogram (which is listed by VA as part of the evidence) shows that in addition to mildly dilated left atrium the left ventricular systolic function revealed distal septal hypokinesia with an ejection fraction of about 50%. Regional wall abnormalities as desccribed above with mild ventricular systolic dysfunction.

My echocardiogram clearly showed that I had an EF of about 50%, which should have granted me the 60% rating. Note the semicolons, which denotes I had to have one of several conditions to meet the 60% requirement. Does this sould like a valid CUE? I am reluctant to go forward unless I can get some advice.

Vern 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Posted Images

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

CUE is the word here. The VA did not properly apply the regs to this case.

Your EF is 40 so that warrants a 60 percent rating.

Now I take it you may have Sleep Apnea unless you have another lung disease. You have had it for an extended period of time. It takes time for PPH to develop.

Pulmonary Hypertension is the key here. Are you service connected for any lung issues?

If you are or get service connection for any pulmonary issues, then You will be at 100 percent P and T with SMC S with the 60 hart rating. If you need help with the Cue Shoot me a PM.

The change in the heart regs in 08 also separated HTN as a separate rating.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

You may also use the heart disease as an agravation to the pulmonary HTN

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CUE is the word here. The VA did not properly apply the regs to this case.

Your EF is 40 so that warrants a 60 percent rating.

Now I take it you may have Sleep Apnea unless you have another lung disease. You have had it for an extended period of time. It takes time for PPH to develop.

Pulmonary Hypertension is the key here. Are you service connected for any lung issues?

If you are or get service connection for any pulmonary issues, then You will be at 100 percent P and T with SMC S with the 60 hart rating. If you need help with the Cue Shoot me a PM.

The change in the heart regs in 08 also separated HTN as a separate rating.

J

I have filed a claim for sleep apnea due to fact my breathing problems were "Noted" in service, yet no sleep test was done until after I separated. I do have OSA, use CPAP every night.

Please see attachment for my explanation from VA when the finally made the award, based on claim I filed in 2003, took 4 years to get this award. The VA did not provide any supporting documentation for how they arrived at the 30%, toher than what was stated. This appears to be from 7007.

Vern 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CUE is the word here. The VA did not properly apply the regs to this case.

Your EF is 40 so that warrants a 60 percent rating.

Now I take it you may have Sleep Apnea unless you have another lung disease. You have had it for an extended period of time. It takes time for PPH to develop.

Pulmonary Hypertension is the key here. Are you service connected for any lung issues?

If you are or get service connection for any pulmonary issues, then You will be at 100 percent P and T with SMC S with the 60 hart rating. If you need help with the Cue Shoot me a PM.

The change in the heart regs in 08 also separated HTN as a separate rating.

J

I have filed a claim for sleep apnea due to fact my breathing problems were "Noted" in service, yet no sleep test was done until after I separated. I do have OSA, use CPAP every night.

Please see attachment for my explanation form VA.

forgot to mention that the same echocardiogram they used for granting me 30% had an EF of "about 50%" as noted on the printout. This may be the basis for my CUE, Clearly should be grantged 60% since I had my last Echocardiogram with 60% rating less than 5 months after separation.

post-15059-0-53261000-1376149588_thumb.j

Vern 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

They do this because they can get away with it. If a veteran doesnt catch it in the first year then he or she has to file a cue claim. Any claim decision made and is not disagreed with in the initial one year period is the same as the Vet saying I agree with you.

Now they interpet the regs to their advantage which is against the law as they are not attorneys and have no legal reason for interpetation which is to be argued in a court of law. They also play doctor and make medical determinations based on record. This is also a No - No.

Go ahead and file a cue claim. You will win, eventually.

Basser

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jbasser is RIGHT! in my opinion.

Did VA use 7007 as the diagnostic code for their original rating?

The worst CUE claim of all is the one that is never filed.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use