Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Ptsd Change To Depression

Rate this question


LarryYoung3

Question

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Yes, but they need a C&P exam, to do it. It may also depend on how long you've had the diagnosis. If they're changing it depression, I foresee them eventually knocking you down to a SC zero award. I would fight it tooth and nail!!!

PTSD can't be cured but can be manageable. jmo

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

LY3: My research (2008-2014) regarding primarily "AO Presumptives & PTSD", indicates only a Physician, VA or Private, can DX a medical or mental condition. The VRO that has your C-File uses the Dr provided DX DBQ to rate you according to the 38 CFR 4 regs per your diagnosed condition. The raters can't change your Dr's DX, they can only use the original C&P DBQ to determine your SC %.

With that said, if for some reason, a new claim or appeal is filed, they can review and possibly order another C&P exam for your PTSD. I personally and the 8 Nam PTSD Vets I meet with, have not had a VA demand for new PTSD C&P since 2010. I've had 3 additional claims filed, including IU, which was recently awarded at a 6/27/14, DRO "Informal Hearing." One guy filed a NOD, at the last month for filing his appeal, requesting a DRO of his 50% award. He and his VSO who actually file the NOD, neglected to request a "Personal Hearing." The Vet never supplied the "Mandatory New Evidence," he planned on presenting the evidence at his DRO Hearing, that he never got. Instead he received a DRO Claim Denial Letter and a "Statement of Case." Between the Vet and his VSO, they screwed the pooch! His only recourse is BVA Court, another 2+yrs or so, good luck with that!

Regarding your current PTSD rating, even if you showed vast improvement (per new DSM-5, GAF Scores don't carry the weight they used to) my understanding of the VA regulations regarding reduction in rating, you could only be cut to the next lower PTSD SC %. In essence, if your at 70% and a new DBQ shows improvement to what is a 30% rating, Highly unlikely if not impossible, you can only be reduced to 50%. If that were to happen (Unlikely) you immediately file a NOD requesting a personal hearing. You do the NOD yourself, too important to intrust to a 3rd party.

Good Luck

Semper Fi

Gastone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

LY3: I forgot to mention the following. Get a copy of any and all PTSD C&P's from VAH Medical Record department. You will see exactly what the C&P Examiner stated on the PTSD DBQ. If you haven't already done so, review the 38 CFR 4 PTSD rating schedule, you'll be able to tell where you are. And keep in mind, "Depression" is a symptom of PTSD. If you received your PTSD rating since about 2010, You had to have had a Staff or Contract VA Psychiatrist or PHD Psychologist administer your initial and all subsequent PTSD C&P's. They may answer the DBQ differently, dependent on you medial records and your responses on the day of the exam, but their not going to reverse another VA Psch. MD diagnoses of PTSD, to just depression.

Before the recent adoption of DSM-5, an improved GAF score placed in your VA Medical Record, by a VA PTSD Social Worker or other mental health clinician, could be grounds for another PTSD C&P, if you filed a claim for anything. If the VA rater saw the improvement from say low 50's to mid or upper 60's, that could trigger another PTSD C&P. I think the Medical community and the VA realized that the same VET seen by 4 different clinicians, could get (4) different GAF scores, varying greatly in severity.

Gastone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I had a c&p which the examiner checked almost all boxes and rated me 100% total & social impairment. I am 50% ptsd now. My c&p indicates that I am worse however Ro says now that I am taking my meds I am doing better which is not true. Still hear voices with most 100% symtoms. It is very true that I am in depression mode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use