Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Can I Earn Income Or Not?

Rate this question


uapao1

Question

I am a 100% DAV for PTSD, DMII, and a handful of other maladies. I heard something today that has raised a BIG Q.

Am I or am I not allowed to earn any income without jeopardizing my SSDI benefits?

Thanks,

Jim Gilmore

307 FMS U-Tapao AB, Thailand 71-72

617 MASS Da Nang AB, Vietnam 72

616 MASS Tan Son Nhut AB, Vietnam 72-73

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

I wont comment on whether or not income is taxed, as this is something you need to discuss with your accountant who will take in to account your personal situation, which I have no knowledge of.

However, from a strictly VA standpoint here is my take:

VA regulations, if you look up the criteria for 100% (PTSD is lumped in with other mental disorders), you will see that it states your (mental condition) affects all areas, work, social, family etc.

Further, if you look at the regulations on Reductions and severance, you will see that the reductions for P and T suggest an improved condition "under ordinary conditions of life", that is, working. In other words the fact that you are working indicates an "improved condition under ordinary conditions of life" since normal people "work" while disabled people, generally, do not.

VA regulations also state that they generally dont do reexams (to try to reduce your rating) for people over the age 55.

From all this, I would conclude: If you are under 55, and working while collecting 100% PTSD you face some risk of being reduced in rating. However, the criteria for IU uses the phrase "substantial gainful employment (SGE)" This means you can get IU if you lack the ability to maintain SGE. SGE is defined, for VA purposes, to be income above the poverty level, which VA thinks is about 12,000 per year depening on how many dependents you have.

The bottom line is if you are making less than 12,000 per year, I would not worry about it. The VA is pretty unintested in reducing a Vets rating because he earns $20 on Saturday mowing his neighbors grass. They recognize there is a big gap between being able to cut your neighbors grass and doing this 40 hours a week. Most people can do most things for an hour, but disabled people can not do that 40 hours per week. This is the differnce between "marginal" employment and SGE. IF you are earning SGE, then you can likely expect to be reduced. However, if you are "marginally" employed, reduction is much less likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

If you earned income is below the poverty line then officially you should not have trouble with the VA or SSDI. However, it may rattle the monster's cage and they may take a look at you. If you earn $100 more than poverty level you may have trouble. You get a pension from FedEx, SSDI and 100% from the VA. Do you need the money, or just something to do to feel useful. I would carefully read the criteria for 100% for PTSD. It says total occupational and social impairment. If you have been 100% for over 20 years you can do anything you want. I do know that VA shares information with IRS, SSA and every one else in town including the DEA.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I wont comment on whether or not income is taxed, as this is something you need to discuss with your accountant who will take in to account your personal situation, which I have no knowledge of.

However, from a strictly VA standpoint here is my take:

VA regulations, if you look up the criteria for 100% (PTSD is lumped in with other mental disorders), you will see that it states your (mental condition) affects all areas, work, social, family etc.

Further, if you look at the regulations on Reductions and severance, you will see that the reductions for P and T suggest an improved condition "under ordinary conditions of life", that is, working. In other words the fact that you are working indicates an "improved condition under ordinary conditions of life" since normal people "work" while disabled people, generally, do not.

VA regulations also state that they generally dont do reexams (to try to reduce your rating) for people over the age 55.

From all this, I would conclude: If you are under 55, and working while collecting 100% PTSD you face some risk of being reduced in rating. However, the criteria for IU uses the phrase "substantial gainful employment (SGE)" This means you can get IU if you lack the ability to maintain SGE. SGE is defined, for VA purposes, to be income above the poverty level, which VA thinks is about 12,000 per year depening on how many dependents you have.

The bottom line is if you are making less than 12,000 per year, I would not worry about it. The VA is pretty unintested in reducing a Vets rating because he earns $20 on Saturday mowing his neighbors grass. They recognize there is a big gap between being able to cut your neighbors grass and doing this 40 hours a week. Most people can do most things for an hour, but disabled people can not do that 40 hours per week. This is the differnce between "marginal" employment and SGE. IF you are earning SGE, then you can likely expect to be reduced. However, if you are "marginally" employed, reduction is much less likely.

This should be posted in a Sticky somewhere.........This is a subject that will continue to get questions, even though they have been answered hundreds of times.

Do yourself a favor.....buy some gold and silver! The printing presses are in overdrive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use