Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Dav Purpose

Rate this question


broncovet

Question

  • Lead Moderator

The DAV purpose is, ..."To cooperate with the United States Department of Veterans Affairs"...

Source: http://www.davmembersportal.org/mo/Missouri%20DAV%20Constitution%20Bylaws/National_Constitution_Bylaws_2010.pdf

Article ll "Purpose".

(Other Veterans Service Organizations have similar bylaws).

Keep this in Perspective:

If your neighbor was suing you, would you go to his lawyer for advice on how to settle it? This is exactly what is happening here! The VA pretends to be "non adversarial" and most of us who have been around a while know that is simply not true.

So, we give a POA to a VSO who promised to cooperate with our adversary!!! Its written right into the bylaws that your VSO represents VA not YOU. Its a conflict of interest, big time. So its no wonder our VSO's make ups stuff like

"you cant get tinnitus and hearing aids" from VA.

Source:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

The veteran is his/her own best advocate.

Educate yourself on the process.

Refute denials with sound medical evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

The problem with VSO's is systemic...with your Veterans service officer sworn to "cooperate with VA". Remember this when you count on your VSO to send in your documents. Also remember the head honcho Service officers are earning some 350 grand a year..."helping Veterans" get an average of about $12,000 per year. Source: http://blog.cleveland.com/openers/2008/04/tracey_boulian_hank_vasil_of.html

Wages of head honcho VSO:

https://asknod.wordpress.com/2013/04/24/how-low-is-low/

The "Big 3" VSO (DAV, VFW, AM Legion) head honchos all earned more than the Secretary of VA, source above.

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I realize that these folks are most likely overworked but have to agree with jbasser. I have called my local VSO 6 times over 3 months and can't get him to return my call. He has a frustrated office assistant who consistently parrots "I'll give him the message and ask him to give you a call". I decided to move forward without his assistance.

Green

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

The thing is that most of what the VA claims to do for vets is just a sham and a lie. The VSO's are an extension of that fraudulent system. The VSO's help perpetuate the fraud that the VA is really concerned with helping, rehabilitating and taking care of veterans. In fact the VA is there to get a paycheck at our expense, and to deceive the American public into thinking they are reaching out to those "Who have borne the battle" etc. The objective of every vet who has any disability is to get to 100% because only then will he/she get even 50% of what they might deserve. Even after all the scandals you see the pathetic reaction of the VA. A larger backlog of claims and appeals and a Choice Card that helps only 10% of vets. I can also tell you that Fee Base is pretty poor. Many of the doctors that accept it are crooks who inflate their services and costs because they only see dollar signs. I went to fee base dentist recently. Worst experience since I was treated by an Army dentist. I give up on that route. No more VA fee base for me. I feel like a fool for believing for one moment they were on the level. Reminds of the worker's compensation doctors I used to see......crooks by any other name because no honest doctors would fool with them. We do need a revolution in the VA system but I won't be around to see it unless I live to 150.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use