Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Bva Closed My Appeal - That I Just Filed?

Rate this question


TiredCoastie

Question

At this point, I'm hoping that there must be some mistake within the 'tron factory that operates eBenefits. At least I'm hoping beyond hope that's the case but have a bad feeling about this. Anyone else have this kind of scare?

My C-file and appeal have been sitting at our local RO waiting to transfer to the BVA. So I've been patiently watching it do nothing for the last couple of months, even after getting a phone call from the RO telling me that they were about to transfer it maybe a month ago.

This morning, eBenefits showed no motion, like usual.

Tonight, when I logged on to check, I found that the appeal has been closed by the BVA, jumping straight to the "Decision & Claims File Dispatch" phase (over stuff like "With the VLJ") with the following note:

Your case has been received at BVA, and BVA has mailed your decision to you (and your representative, if any) and will be returning your claims file to the VA Medical Center. Please note that transit times vary, and there may be some lag time between when BVA forwards your claims file to its appropriate location and when that location receives it.

Huh? My Form 9 was submitted in mid-November 2014. This ISN'T the years of waiting everyone else is talking about. There must be a problem.

AB8 shows no change to my combined rating.

I've emailed the BVA Ombudsman asking for their assistance (thanks, Berta, for keeping that contact info in the forefront).

Is this some sort of mistake? Why would the BVA return my claim file to the VAMC, not the RO? Could the BVA have decided that not enough information had been gathered by the RO to make a decision either way? But why close the appeal, if that's the case?

Could it be that the RO's mistake was so blaringly obvious that it was remanded immediately upon opening? Or is my appeal that screwed up? Or is this just another eBenefit's hiccup?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Maybe the BVA ordered another pension exam, but then they should have returned it to your VARO I think. This is weird and makes no sense to me. Maybe ombudsman can shed light on this. I never heard of BVA making a decision in 2 months

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Yeah, and it's not like they even had it for two months. The max the BVA could have had it is maybe a month, but that assumes that eBenefits didn't update which is certainly possible. Thanks, John!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Coastie: As always, I could be wrong, FDI! The VA just doesn't move that fast or at least they never have. I think 1 of the worst things you can do, for your own mental health, is to rely on E-Ben or any of the VA 800 numbers. All the way up to my 2010 NOD DRO Hearing 06/14, I could never get any meaningful information on my claim from anyone at the VA or VSO. Just be 100% sure all your evidence is in the VA's hot hands. If in doubt, send it in again.

This may or may not be worth something. Around 01/14 I'm getting my shorts in a knot regarding the 1st of 2 NOD's hearing date. all I was getting was the VA Form Letter, sorry taking so long we're working on it BS. So I'm rereading the VA DRO's manual for the 3rd or 8th time, and I see where a DRO can request an "INformal Conference" with the Vet or his Rep to discuss evidence. Good for the DRO, why not me? I file a formal Request for the "Informal Conference" the following day. Got my Rtn Recp from US Mail and never really heard anything else, right up till 05/5?/14, got VA letter saying my Official Hearing was scheduled for 6/27 at 8:00am. At the Hearing, I asked the DRO was the Hearing for my 2010 or 2012 NOD or in response to my request for the "Informal Conference?" He said it was up to me, I was on deck for the 2010 NOD but if I wanted we could do the informal. I opted for Inormal and he cleared both NODs in 35 min. I left knowing he had awarded all major $$ issues from both NODs including IU. After he said he was awarding everything, I never asked if my request for the Informal Conference helped push my hearing or not.

Semper Fi

Gastone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thanks, Gastone. You've got a good idea. I'm not sure where my appeal(s) rest(s) right now, so not sure I'm in a position to try the informal hearing approach. But your comment on eBenefits and the 800# are in the forefront of my mind. My hope is that it's just an error of some sort that will clear up tomorrow after the workday starts in DC.

Meanwhile, my brain's limping along at a mile a minute --

Is it possible that in consultation between the BVA and the RO, could the appeal been closed because I had dueling NODs in the system?

The first NOD became the appeal but the second got dropped out of the system. I appealed two different SC/rating decisions on the same contentions. The following post was me looking for advice as to what to do:

Could it be that because the RO did not consider the second NOD, but may make a different decision having reviewed the arguments and contents, which were maybe more refined than the initial NOD, that the initial appeal is being dropped in lieu of a second look at the RO-level triggered by my insistence to at least acknowledge the second NOD?

For the record, if there is a big mix-up with my appeal(s), it's the fault of the VSO who insisted I needed to file a "request for reconsideration" claim instead of appeal each and every problem with the decision right off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

That "Request for Reconsideration" has been whooped like a rented mule. No such step exists at the VARO level, so it's basically a hope and a prayer type try to get the original rater to rethink his original decision, good luck on that. Never really seen any stats on the success of that move. Might work on a minor miss by the Rater but doubt it works on anything else. The real problem seems to be it gives the Vet a false since of being proactive. I think 1 Vet posted on HADIT, she was worried about Filing her husband's NOD, fearing it would derail her "Request for Reconsideration." I think she was at the end of the 11th month of the NOD filing window. Have to look back and see how she did. Her VSO really gave her some BUM Appeal info.

Semper Fi

Gastone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

The VA is required to send out a letter letting the veteran know they got their claim letter or evidence letter within 2 -3 weeks what ever you send them!

Although most of us do get a sign return receipt, ...I Make copies of every thing I send and I resend it if I don't hear from them in 3 weeks the second time I sent I did hear from them then letting me know they got it..... but I did make more copies.

I don't know if that helps a veteran? but it helped me.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use