Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Iu Termination Letter

Rate this question


alecbrooks

Question

http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o159/snowwhite811/Scanva0001.jpg

I was approved for individual unemployability in December and just recieved this letter today. I'm completely freaking out and cant talk to anyone until monday. The letter says my benefit payment will remain unchanged but it says my individual unemployability is terminated so which one is it?? are my payments going to be reduced? has anyone gotten a similar letter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

All of the above and has your "Gainful Employment Income" remained below the $12,400 limit? Was this VA letter possibly a Notice of Intent to reduce your IU Comp to your actual SC rate? We need way more info regarding what's happened in the last 12 months that could have caused the VA to jump ugly. What are your thoughts?

Very traumatic experience, but you need to take an inventory of your situation. There has to be a "WHY" and you need to determine what it is, in order to address it. I think phone calls are probably a waste of time. I'd be at the VARO Monday 8:30am and find a VSO office and discuss your problem with hopefully the Head VSO Rep. The VARO VSO's have greater access to your VA Claims info than their satellite reps. Not unusual to find a Well Seasoned VSO Rep that is on 1st name basis with Honchos in the VA Claims/Rating Dept, quite often on the same floor as the VSO. Keep in mind, any VSO can assist you, even if your Repped by another VSO. Which ever VSO is open and staffed with Reps would be my choice for tracking down your problem.

Semper Fi

Gastone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Yeah I am not sure why my status was changed. I have not gotten any letters or had any appointments from the VA since I was started on IU. It seems kind of arbitrary to be honest unless I was moved up to 100% from the 90% I was already on due to the IU rating. I have also had no earned income because my disability makes it hard for me to function outside my house. This letter was the only one I received saying I was no longer on IU and the only reason given is that the original decision was unmistakably erroneous and no other reason is given.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I always thought the only way a rating can be terminated is if the VA finds evidence of fraud & incarceration. (jail time)

However there have been cases where the VA awards TDIU OR IU when the veteran should have been awarded 100%.(For the disability....example if the award was decided on PTSD to be 100% SC but the veteran was below the 100% and the va rater decision was awarded TDIU/IU by the extra scheduler to bring the rating up to the 100% level then they terminate the TDIU and rate the the 100% PTSD Rating.

Seems fishy they caught this...maybe the VA will send more of an explanation!


A proposal to reduce service connected benefits will be they find evidence that the disability's has got better or not as worse as the veteran claims.

If they terminated the IU Because they made a mistake ...they are trying to snooker you so to speak and rating you the 100% for your SC Disability's as they should have in the original decision.

you may have a cue but if they keep you at 100% For your SC Disability its sure something to think about before you appeal as cue.

JMO


.......................Buck

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

© Individual unemployability. (1) In reducing a rating of 100 percent service-connected disability based on individual unemployability, the provisions of §3.105(e) are for application but caution must be exercised in such a determination that actual employability is established by clear and convincing evidence. When in such a case the veteran is undergoing vocational rehabilitation, education or training, the rating will not be reduced by reason thereof unless there is received evidence of marked improvement or recovery in physical or mental conditions or of employment progress, income earned, and prospects of economic rehabilitation, which demonstrates affirmatively the veteran's capacity to pursue the vocation or occupation for which the training is intended to qualify him or her, or unless the physical or mental demands of the course are obviously incompatible with total disability. Neither participation in, nor the receipt of remuneration as a result of participation in, a therapeutic or rehabilitation activity under 38 U.S.C. 1718 shall be considered evidence of employability.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1718(f))

(2) If a veteran with a total disability rating for compensation purposes based on individual unemployability begins to engage in a substantially gainful occuption during the period beginning after January 1, 1985, the veteran's rating may not be reduced solely on the basis of having secured and followed such substantially gainful occupation unless the veteran maintains the occupation for a period of 12 consecutive months. For purposes of this subparagraph, temporary interruptions in employment which are of short duration shall not be considered breaks in otherwise continuous employment.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1163(a))

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I suggest that when you contact the VA on Monday, if they dont seem to be able to help you with this odd letter, then file an IRIS complaint.

You have the right to know what CUE they committed and a right to appeal it.

I assume you had no other claims pending when this occurred.

VA has been know to find living vets to be "dead", and when vets get that letter (to their "widow") they have gone to the press, it is so ludicrous.

VA makes MANY mistakes , it could be a snafu...but even if it is a snafu they should have explained the CUE they committed,even if they sent this letter to the wrong veteran.

What VARO is this.?

This might be a better idea than the IRIS complaint....

I have phone/ fax/and some email addys for their RO directors..and their VSCMs.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

They (VA) Admits the CUE in the letter of Explanation! but don't give bases and reason (as why)

http://s119.photobucket.com/user/snowwhite811/media/Scanva0001.jpg.html

I think if they rate this veteran 100% for the SC Disability!

My question would be why appeal it as CUE?

But could go back to the award date and maybe get a better EED.

Remember an EED goes back to the onset of the disability.

or when the disability worsen after filing original claim.

jmo

.................Buck

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use