Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Secondary Ratings ?

Rate this question


Buck52

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Based on these CFR's

§§3.955-3.956 [Reserved]

§3.957 Service connection.

Service connection for any disability or death granted or continued under title 38 U.S.C., which has been in effect for 10 or more years will not be severed except upon a showing that the original grant was based on fraud or it is clearly shown from military records that the person concerned did not have the requisite service or character of discharge. The 10-year period will be computed from the effective date of the Department of Veterans Affairs finding of service connection to the effective date of the rating decision severing service connection, after compliance with §3.105(d). The protection afforded in this section extends to claims for dependency and indemnity compensation or death compensation.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1159)

Questions?

If a veteran files secondary to his alredy SC 90% disability, TDIU P&T under these CFR'S the veteran can not be reduced or sent to a C&P exam Based on he has 10 years and more on the original disability,

so if the veteran files for a secondary disability that arose from his SC Disibility, then that can't touch his P&T Disability if he files for the secondary. > is this correct?

..................Buck

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

IU is a very difficult rating to get, as well it should be. Barring the 20 Yr Rating Lock Anniversary, significant improvement of SC conditions or 12 months of continued earned income above the SGI $12,400 or $11,400 if over 65, could trigger the Rating Reduction Letter.

Any NEW Comp claim would require a C & P unless a Vet did a FDC with all the recent Medical evidence, including DBQs, attached. If the RO had originally awarded P & T, No Future Exams Scheduled, another Rater isn't going to challenge the non issue SCs; without cause.

The IU and Earned Income is a different story, I think at least until the Vet hits the 70 yrs old mark.

When I was awarded IU in 2014, there was no mention by the DRO or in the Award Letter, as I recall, about the requirement to complete a VA 21-4140-1 Employment Questionnaire. My understanding now, is the failure to return this completed form to the VA each year, is cause for a IU reduction to your actual SC rating. The VA is supposed to mail the form out each year but it's the Vet's responsibility to make sure a completed 21-4140-1 is filed each year, whether received from the VA or not.

Semper Fi

Gastone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Buck

When I say a specific rating I mean any rating. If you have a 50% rating for sleep apnea for 20 years the VA cannot reduce it according to their own regulations. P&T does not mean P&T for any specific rating unless you have that rating continuously for 20 years. They can't sever SC after 10 years like PR says.

Gastone

I download the Employment Questionnaire every year and send it via Certified Mail/Return Receipt and I have had TDIU for 14 years P&T. I am not taking chances with those SOB's.

When I look at my ratings it does say I must fill in the VA 21-4140-1 until my 70th birthday. I do go to the VA for treatment of my SC conditions even though they are not worth a damn. Even though I am 65 and definitely unemployable for a host of reasons now I still go to the VA. I can't quote all the regulations, but I have seen them so often on Hadit I know what they mean since we have discussed this stuff often and it is confusing. Why shouldn't P&T mean actual P&T? That is the tricky VA. If you are vulnerable to reduction I suggest you at least get treatment for your SC conditions at the VA. You don't have to let them do anything invasive no matter what they say. I would not let them do a colonoscopy on me or endoscopy on me.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Gastone thanks for your input I appreciate it.

As for as getting a C&P for the previous sc p&t disability, its no problem ,but to me its really uncalled for when the disability will never show an improvement and its rated static & of permanent in nature and the veteran is older than 55...I'm just going by what the CFR'S state ...Which I learned from carlie back when she got called up for a needless C&P However like you mention maybe IU is a different story!

I believe when the veteran has been rated IU P&T For 10 years or more concurrent & No Interruptions He don't need to send in the

21-4140-1

I had sent in the 21-4140-1 every year on my anniversary award date /like yours there was nothing about sending in that 21-4140-1 questioner letter on my Award letter either.

Matter of fact I do remember my DRO telling me that I may get this employment questioner letter on occasion to fill out and send back, I never got one but I did fill it out every year

Then my(RO) sent me a letter stating I don't need to send that form in anymore about my 11th year with tdiu p&t I been TDIU for almost 15 years now concurrent

I stopped sending that form in about 3 years ago, so for nothing back from RO?

I don't understand why all RO's never sent the letter out to there veterans like my RO did?

Thanks John999 I got it now.

............Buck

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

My 21-4140-1 is locked & cocked, just waiting to see if the VA sends 1 or not. 21/2 yrs and a wake up till 70.

Semper Fi

Gastone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use