Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

A Warning As To Dic Claims


Berta

Question

"Based on my recent decision, and a phone call from the director of my VARO, I assume I am not just an isolated event, and that VA can and will try to pull this bull crap on any one's eventual survivor.

Whether you have a 100% SC rating or not,

whether that rating remains in your lifetime until your demise,continuously by all medical evidence,

whether you have evidence that the rating is Permanent as well as Total,

And

whether that disability has caused or contributed to your death by Death Certificate and/0r autopsy-if an autopsy was done

your survivors can be DENIED DIC,

accrued benefits,

CHAMPVA,

Chapter 35

and any other potential state or county tax exemptions etc etc.......

......if the VA can deem that 100% disability ( or TDIU solely for one disability) as total when you die, but somehow NOT Permanent in your lifetime and at time of death.

Death makes any 100% SC disability Permanent in a veteran's lifetime."

This is copied from my post at the End of Life topic in claims research.

Of course this "reason" for denial of 16 additional months of my accrued benefits, came from the Director of my RO in a phone call.

The decision has no reason.It just says no additional accrued amount is owed.

I got 6 months of the accrued in 2012 but filed CUE as they failed to rate the veteran's residuals of a 1151 stroke.

The decision rated the residuals at 100% and properly awarded the 100% for the entire 22 months ( 100% plus SMC and 2 dependents)

but I never got the additional 16 months owed to me.

And VA Chief of Comp ( Quality Review Team) told me the PC screen was reading awarded and sent the entire amount ---22 months accrued.

He said the fact that I didnt get that 16 month payments must have been a finance error.

Yet the director says I wont get it. Because the veteran was not Permanently disabled by his 1151 stroke.

ALL of my evidence they refuse to read says he was Permanently disabled by this 1151 stroke.

My evidence is impeccable. And Permanency should not even be an issue.

His 30% SC for PTSD was raised posthumoulsy to 100% P & T .

Death makes any continuously standing 100% award -Permanent.

1151 are rated exactly like SCs are. My 2012 award proves that.

I have made this point here many times recently.

Perhaps I am the only survivor who VA has ever tried to pull this bull shit on.

or perhaps this is a brand new VA policy (not supported by any regulation whatsoever)

that ROs will start to use to deny survivors claims.

So Try all you can to get the Permanency designation in your lifetime.,if you are TDIU or 100%.

( which my husband DID get by C & P exams, NYS student loan waiver, Voc Rehab statement , and even in a letter from a former VA Secretary, among other evidence they have.regarding his 1151 stroke)

And make sure the spouse knows the evidential regulations in 38 CFR and M21-1MR pertaining to DIC and accrued benefits.

They are all here at hadit.I have posted them dozens of times.38 CFR 4.6 is the most important one we all have....whether veterans or survivors of veterans.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Ms berta

can you appeal this to the High courts in Washington?

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Perhaps this got overlooked in my attempt to explain all this.

The additional accrued benefits were "granted" from March 1, 1993 to October 14, 1994.

In my recent March 6 decision. 100 % plus SMC and 2 dependents.

Both conditions of my CUE were met.

I got the first 6 months from Aug 1992 to March 1993 in 2012.

The statement after the grant says "Therefore No additional accrued payments is due."

Because the PC , the VACO man read shows I have already been paid 22 months of benefits.

The director gave me a completely different reason....that the CVA was not Permanent when all evidence VA has says it was Permanent.

The accrued amount is a 5 figure award.

I was awarded the CUE , and granted the award.

Someone else must have gotten the 16 additional months of accrued.Maybe that is why my date of NOD was manipulated from October 2012 to April 2015.

"can you appeal this to the High courts in Washington?"

That is exactly what I am doing and also breathing down their necks to fix this.

It all takes up a lot of my time. It might take weeks, months or years.

I will return to hadit when it gets resolved.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

I wish you the best luck on this. We all know you will set them straight!

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Any decision can be appealed but some are handled differently. Many years ago I asked for Fee Service and VA turned it down. I asked for a Hearing and with the help of a Doc on the panel got the original decision reversed. Not that any Doc in Dallas would put up with the VA rules and slow pay.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I am appealing a medical decision not to do necessary dental work involving dental implants which ended up costing me 15 grand. The VA said that in 2010 dental implants were not standard dental care, and they did not offer them at my hospital. They just pulled teeth and made dentures. Dental implants have been around for 20 years as an alternative to bridge work. I am appealing via Fee Base Unauthorized Claims. I won one of these before when I had work done while waiting for my TDIU on appeal. It has been six months since my claims. I bet they have lost them or just tossed them, but I have copies. You know there are dentists in my part of Tampa who have applied to be VA providers and the VA just ignores them.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use