Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

odd C-File Contents question

Rate this question


GeekySquid

Question

Here is an odd question about the C-file.

Is EVERYTHING done by the VAMC supposed to end up in your C-file?

I do mean everything.

The reason I ask, is that in other posts here I have mentioned missing records from the VAMC New Orleans.

When I saw my new VA Primary Care Doc for the first time, she asked tons of questions, which was great.

In answer to one of them I mentioned that the VAMC New Orleans lost a bunch of my records and I was pissed about it.

She had her unit's Social Worker call me to offer assistance on the issue.

It turns out there is something called the Joint Legacy Viewer, which is an application that has insight into every medical record the VA has on you no matter what system it is in. Apparently there are several different systems your records could be in depending on location and year you were seen.

When I went yesterday for a follow up on my foot surgery, I went to the Social Workers office and in a couple minutes he pulled up a set of treatment notes about the VNG I had for my vertigo back in 2013 that VAMC New Orleans says is "lost".

Those notes are not in my c-file.

So I am curios if anyone knows if some files are not put in the c-file. These notes I found don't follow the typical format that VAMC uses and happens to list the Procedure Codes associated with each treatment or test done. For example for the Vertigo they list procedures 92540 through 92547 as being done and the results appended elsewhere.

i am going to make an appointment to spend a day searching those files, but I also want to get all of them so I need to figure out that path

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
1 minute ago, GBArmy said:

if we have an A.O. disability the VA automatically puts us in the Registry?

 @GBArmy

wouldn't it be awesome if, for once, the VA did something proactively for Vets? If that ever happened I would pass out in shock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

There are a lot of guys that would never trust the VA to do anything proactive that would actually help Veterans. That said, if asked, I always say we should register, because facts are facts. Eventually, the VA has to see there is a connection with "X" disease and A.O. If they don't get those numbers, it just easier for them to deny. Same holds true for the Burn Pit Registry. My heart goes out to those veterans because I see it to be A.O. all over again. These guys are going to suffer from all kinds of maladies and illnesses before the VA starts to recognize the connection. I don't know the numbers, but it has to be a very high rejection rate on Burn Pit disability claims. The more numbers show a connection, the harder it will be for the VA to look the other way. JMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
6 minutes ago, GBArmy said:

JMO.

it is JMO here too. I agree.

I am one of those that believe the VAB will never do anything proactively to help Veterans. Only when a higher court or Congress demand something happen will it happen.

Sadly it  is up to Veterans to keep pushing these issues and get attention to the problem. Otherwise it is smothered under a rug someplace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder
2 hours ago, GBArmy said:

Buck, are you saying that if we have an A.O. disability the VA automatically puts us in the Registry?

No I never said that? if I did I sure never meant to!

 ALL Veterans that have been in contact with A.O. or a boots on the ground Vietnam or Korea Veterans  or here in the USA Like James Cripps .

  Needs to registered if they have not did so,  but you don't need to be in the A.O.register to file a A.O. Presumption Claim..being in  the A.O. Register helps speed up any Red Type. 

However it will not help a Veteran Win his/her claim/presumption or  direct claims. 

 We do that with Medical Evidence and Help from Qualified  Doctor's

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • alexpainter earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • catyvaz1 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      First Post
    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use