Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

C-File Law Suit

Rate this question


RBrogen

Question

Curious if anyone here has gone through the FOIA and had to ultimately sue the VA in Federal District Court to force them to provide their C-File in a more timely manner?  FOIA's are required to be fulfilled in 20 business days by law assuming no special circumstances.  Obviously the VA isn't going to respond to anything in 20 days but when it goes on for 6 months or longer that is ridiculous and slows our ability to address claim denials/issues quickly.  I just filed a FOIA appeal and was sent a letter from the Office of General Counsel, Veterans Administration that my FOIA request was DENIED under FOIA Exemption 6 but remanded to be provided via the Privacy Act.  The issue is that the Privacy Act process has no deadline so they can take as long as they want, while the FOIA actually has deadlines and a process for relief when they don't do what they are supposed to.  From my understanding, this is a tact the VA uses to confuse people into thinking it is a Privacy Act request and not a FOIA request.

Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.

 

rackamall.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
8 hours ago, Berta said:

Me too about 3 weeks ago- Sometimes the IG determines they cannot look into complaints- it all depends on what it is about----

And their web site says to try to do all you can to get the complaint rectified by other means.

I read that too. The problem I have is that the VA has information on me that they are not willing to share with me. Sounds like you are having the same issue. This is just another way for the VA to hold all the cards. 

I not sure how to put a case together for this but I will figure it out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I believe what Asknod/Alex is saying is only 11 won the writ process because the action was completed before it actually go to the judge i.e. no longer necessary because the deed was done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
26 minutes ago, Patton said:

I read that too. The problem I have is that the VA has information on me that they are not willing to share with me. Sounds like you are having the same issue. This is just another way for the VA to hold all the cards. 

I not sure how to put a case together for this but I will figure it out. 

From my understanding, you can get the information "forcefully" via FOIA/FOIA Appeal/Law Suit in US District court.  I have the complaint for the law suit completely filled out so all I would need to do is go to the local US District Court magistrate and file it and it would then have the court order them to release the information in a "short period" of time.

rackamall.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
3 minutes ago, RBrogen said:

From my understanding, you can get the information "forcefully" via FOIA/FOIA Appeal/Law Suit in US District court.  I have the complaint for the law suit completely filled out so all I would need to do is go to the local US District Court magistrate and file it and it would then have the court order them to release the information in a "short period" of time.

Wow, I never thought I would get this many replies. Sorry for the high jack RBrogen. I just thought that it was related to your post.

I think I would have a problem with a Law Suit, since I work for the U.S. Government in Germany. I am going to do a little more research but I am going to get them to fix the problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
6 minutes ago, Patton said:

Wow, I never thought I would get this many replies. Sorry for the high jack RBrogen. I just thought that it was related to your post.

I think I would have a problem with a Law Suit, since I work for the U.S. Government in Germany. I am going to do a little more research but I am going to get them to fix the problem.

No worries at all .... the more info out there for all of us the better.

rackamall.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
21 hours ago, RBrogen said:

I'm confused by your post probably because of my lack of experience/knowledge of the Writ.  It seems you say on one hand to file a Writ and then later you say only 11 people have won a Writ since 1990?

Correct me if I am wrong here. The relief you seek is a claims file in your hands. Is that correct?  If you file the Ex Writ and VA complies by supplying you with your claims file, why would you win the Writ? Once VA complies,they dismiss the Writ as being moot as there is no longer any case or controversy. Now, if VA did not comply and provide you with the file, the Court would grant your Writ and sanction the VA Secretary with a monetary fine until he complied. And they would still force the Secretary to supply the claims file under continuing sanctions. 

As for the VAOIG, their job is to investigate VA abuses, medical malpractice, the correct procedures for doing claims, timeliness in complying etc. They really have to power to sanction the RMC or the Secretary for individual mistakes or errors. There is a legal path to correct inequity and deprivation of due process. If anyone has any luck with OIG getting the claims file, please report back here and tell us.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use