Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Question

Rate this question


Holllie Greene

Question

Hi,

Has anyone ever heard of the VA granting an appeal and increasing the percentage but not giving retro?

I know the VA can do whatever they want.

Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Hi Hollie No, I can't imagine it. The only thing I'm thinking is it is a finding on a mh condition, like PTSD. It is the date of the finding, not when submitted. So, if it were determined and adjudicated in the same month??? I donno. What is the background facts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder
1 hour ago, Holllie Greene said:

Hi,

Has anyone ever heard of the VA granting an appeal and increasing the percentage but not giving retro?

I know the VA can do whatever they want.

Thank you.

Who Mention This to You?

KEEP A CLOSE EYE ON YOUR AWARD PACKET (AWARD LETTER)   AND READ IT VERY CAREFULLY.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
2 hours ago, Holllie Greene said:

Hi,

Has anyone ever heard of the VA granting an appeal and increasing the percentage but not giving retro?

I know the VA can do whatever they want.

Thank you.

"Ladies and gentlemen: the story you are about to hear is true. Only the ratings and dates have been changed to protect the innocent."

Yes, it is very possible, This is just an example: Granted 100% in 2010. In 2012 BVA grants an appeal with a new separate claim effective 2005, retro payment is paid. NOD for increase and local VARO grants it effective 2013, no retro payment due. Files a new NOD and appeal goes back to BVA and BVA grants EED to 2000 with new increased rating.  So that rating will generate a new decision with a retro payment due. So the local VARO thought they could get away with granting the increased claim with absolutely no retro. So you appeal and get a higher retro going back even further.  😀😄😀

 

P.S.  STOP READING MY FILE....

Edited by pete992
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Gentlemen,

Thank you all for your info and thoughts.  Here's what happened: after filing for an increase a little over two years ago for worsening multiple sclerosis a rater decreased my neurogenic bladder.  Huh?  Really?  Seriously?  MS is a disease with no cure and only gets worse.  The bladder is affected in 90 percent of MS-ers.  I am one of those MS-ers.  The C&P was a disaster.

After a few months of soul searching (and much to my husband's concern) I filed an appeal.  Since I am rated P & T for seventeen years now some creative accounting occurred.

However, this decrease was incorrect.  Hence I filed the NOD.

A few weeks ago I checked Ebennies (having been told by everyone and their uncle it is not accurate) and much to my surprise the old percentage was back.

No BBE or BWE yet.

Of course Peggy will not say anything.  So I wait.

Ebens says my case is closed.  The hubs and I are of the opinion I will not receive anything. 

Thanks again guys.  😀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
24 minutes ago, Holllie Greene said:

Thank you all for your info and thoughts.  Here's what happened: after filing for an increase a little over two years ago for worsening multiple sclerosis a rater decreased my neurogenic bladder.  Huh?  Really?  Seriously?  MS is a disease with no cure and only gets worse.  The bladder is affected in 90 percent of MS-ers.  I am one of those MS-ers.  The C&P was a disaster.

Really not sure of what's going on with your claim but I do know that it is illegal for VA to decrease a veteran's claim when the veteran files for an increase and the disability is static. Always keep in mind that VA will try anything and only get away with it, if the veteran doesn't appeal.  As you can see VA tries this a lot. Not sure if a retro is due but your rating should at least be restored.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Hollie Wait for the BBE of course. Read it carefully. If you don't get retro for the back pay request a HLR immediately. It is the quickest way and hopefully, you can get a DRO that has a brain. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use