Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Defense Bill will add 3 new AO presumptives

Rate this question


Berta

Question

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Well, Berta, I don't think we should RUSH into this. Don't you think they should have studied it more. It's barely been 50 years you know. These things take time! You also noticed that they didn't include hypertension in the bill. Seems that would cost a lot to pay out on benefits, so see, they are going to do some more studying on that one. The article didn't disclose that the scientific data backing inclusion of hypertension is admittedly stronger than the evidence on the other 3. But you can't convince me money would stand in the way of our wonderful Congress when it's about doing what is right for Veterans. It just takes a little time. I truey hope you Gulf War Veterans are paying attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Yeah-well put GBArmy-and Wilkie could have  added these presumptives about 2 years ago-

some of the AO vets who could have benefitted from this long ago- are probably dead by now, and I hope (and pray) their spouses come to hadit for help , if any of there new presumptives caused or substantially contributed to their deaths.

You are so right about this:

 "I truey hope you Gulf War Veterans are paying attention."

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

What has changed since the Revolutionary War Warrants?  Nothing other than a guarantee in Section (4) of the Fourteenth Amendment that has essentially been written out of the Constitution by SCOTUS and the Appeals Courts.  Not one referenced case on that particular phrase in Section (4) anywhere to be found in case law.

If you can find one, please post it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Hello Berta and other vets.

I spent time on the ground several times in DaNang. I would fly from the USS Hancock CVA 19 to get the mail and supplies. I “acquired” bladder cancer, prostate cancer and hypertension, all within a couple of months of each other. I filed a claim well over two years ago for the prostate cancer. I was denied twice. My second appeal was a year ago. Nothing. The VA says I don’t have enough evidence of being there. Unfortunately the flight logs have been destroyed and deck logs don’t specify exact aircraft or passengers that launched or where they are headed. I provided letters to my parents with the original postmarked envelopes talking about my time in DaNang. That wasn’t enough. The VA even denied that a C1A aircraft was on the ship that I traveled in. It was SN 038. I provided photos of it. Still not good enough. By the way my bladder cancer had returned. If my case, of having three things that Agent Orange causes isn’t enough I really don’t have more to offer. Any suggestions? Any advocates out there that can help me?
 

Thanks,

John Etter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

John The most obvious thing I can think of is a Buddy Letter. Can you contact an old friend that was in your unit that can verify where you went? You've gotten all your personnel records from Archives? Never went to sick call that would reference some illness or injury that occurred while there. How about the CO of your unit; he could verify what your duties were if he were available? Do you have any other pictures? Last thing I could think of is inquire many big law groups, like CC&P, and see if they have an interest. Sometimes the VA will accept some pretty liberal evidence. If you picked up the mail, did you have to sign for it? Maybe try to get a copy of the receipt from the unit you picked up from.You need a nugget to prove you were in country, and a buddy letter could tip the scales.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use