Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Rate this question


Mark777

Question

Hello,

It is nice to be here. I think I posted in the wrong area. Please forgive me. I’m having difficulty learning how to post something. I was approved for SMC L1 and put in a request for a half step due to a stand alone condition. This turned  into a Higher Level Review. The VA stated that the rater used things that were not service related. I have 3 different cancers, diabetes and a stroke that are not rated at this time. I am a 100% permanent and total vet with many spine and neck issues that effect me an am also rated 100% for stand alone PTSD. Due to my many nerve a disc problems, I am bedridden with loss of use of my legs. My wife is physician that has to quit working to take care of me. She is my caregiver and also my doctor at home for she administers my medicine, take care of and treats bed sores, physical therapy, acupuncture, blood pressure checks, etc. on top of that she does the feeding, grooming, showering, and keeps me from harming myself because of my PTSD. The VA has found me incompetent as well. I just had a Aid & Attendance exam because they failed to ever do one. Everything seemed fine and I told the doctor that I am bedridden and only get out of bed into a wheelchair with the aid of my wife, to take a shower, attend any necessary medical appointments by the VA and very seldom, my wife will take me outside for a few minutes. Unbeknownst to me, the doctor fill out the form I later found out that he has]d me wheelchair bound and bedridden for 8 hours at night and 5 hours during the day. My question is, did the doctor mess the claim up for being bedridden and messing up the chances for R1? I didn’t know there was such thing until it hear that 2 L’s equal O and if one is for Aid & Attendance then it’s R1. I hope this is understandable to you all and I thank you for your time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Agree with Kanewnut Contact asknod.org. He would be the guy I would want to talk to about these special SMC's and if you wanted to appeal, he would be a great resource IMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

You posted:

Quote

 I was approved for SMC L1 and put in a request for a half step due to a stand alone condition. This turned  into a Higher Level Review. The VA stated that the rater used things that were not service related.

A "higher level review" means an appeal and that you were denied.  What were you denied for?

It does not "turn into a higher level review", you have to appeal if you dispute a decision and you can opt for a Higher level review (HLR).  I somewhat agree with Kanewnut that we need more information to help you better.  

1.  Do you have "loss of use" of body parts (feet (wheelchair?), arms, eyes, etc?  If so which body parts and are those related to service?  You may have to get additional SC's in order to increase your SMC.  Example:  If you are not SC for a leg/foot condition, then you would need for that to happen before you could get loss of use of your legs.  

2.  You said your wife is a physician.  (You may not know that you can receive care by a relative and still be compensated for it, such as A and A).  

Reason I ask:  There are different levels of A and A, depending mostly upon the type of care.  In other words, if you can be given care by just a neighbor (without any medical training), then that is level 1.  But, if you have IV's and a nurse is required, this is a higher level of care.  You did not indicate if you have to have shots every day for diabetes, for example, nor did you specify whether you needed a nurse or doctors daily care.  

     Surely your physician spouse can accurately describe some of the above stuff, and VA can not deny you based solely on your doctor is an "interested party".  

     You probably need to apply for additional disabilities if any of those are either related to service OR they are secondary to a currently SC condition.  As an example, if you are SC for diabetes, and you also have high blood pressure, these could well be related, and rated as secondaries.

     Given that you posted you are not competent to manage your finances, your fiduciary (which could be your spouse) can guide you, especially if your representative posts here on hadit also.  

     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thank you for the responses you all.

My Higher Level Review was for Aid and Attendance supposedly given out prematurely. They also that the rater used things that were not service connected even though none of them were listed on my rating sheet under Aid and Attendance. I am rated 100% for PTSD and I have a lot of service rated back and nerve conditions leading to loss of use of my legs. I am Bedridden for even being in a wheelchair is extremely painful due to my rated back issues. My wife changes my bandages when treating my bedsores and give me daily injections of insulin with monitoring of sugar levels and  blood pressure checks for rated hypertension, enimas when needed for my rated IBS. I just know if by the doctor putting me down for 13 hours a day would circumvent me being VA rated for being bedridden. I hope that clarifies things a little more. Thank You again 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use