Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Headache letter

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

Hi,

So what do you understand from this? photo in the Link - https://ibb.co/5Wm84vD

 

I already got a diagnostic recently after the letter, So if I send the Diagnostic as a supplemental would they come back denying due to no nexus letter?

Or is the nexus already covered? 
 

Also 3rd paragraph - the medical evidence support the conclusion that a persistent disability was not present.
- would this be the next reason for a denial? how you overcome this?

 

Around November 2007 I was in Afghanistan in the process of being medically transported to Germany and then WalterReed for another condition, I believe I left WalterReed around January or late December and that part of the favorable finding. When I complained of headaches.

This last March 2021 I went to the VA Emergency Room due to strong headaches. I rarely go or complain I just pop some Tylenol or Ibuprofen and call it.

Now I am taking Migraines medication Sumatriptan given to me by the VA.

 

trying to get as much advise as I can before I send a supplemental claim.

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Welcome to hadit.  You have a valid point. 

     There is a "presumptive" here.  Let me explain.  

You enter military service, and were given a physical.  The presumption here, is that the doc did his job, and you had no maladies, other than those he noted on your physical.  

Then, you have an "exit physical".  If you have a malady on your exit physical, which was not on your entrance physical, then the presumption is you got that in service.  

However, VA can "rebut" that presumption.  Lets use an example.  Let's say you have "knee problems" now, but had none before service.  

But you got into a car accident AFTER military service, and records show a knee injury in a car accident post service.  The VA can "rebut" the presumptive, citing your car accident injury.  

      So, you are actually missing "2" of the Caluza elments described in the letter you posted. (allegedly).  

1.  You have no "in service event" or aggravation which was DOCUMENTED in military service.   Now, lets talk about this.  Ok, so you complained of headaches.  Ok.  Well what did you tell the doc that happened in military service that caused your headaches or, did you have headaches documented before and they got worse in service.  For example, did you hit your head on something?  Was it documented?  Did you have a "headache trigger" in service?  I can not answer those questions...I was not with you in service, and I have not seen your service medical records or cfile.  

 

2.  Nexus, or doc statement that your (in service event) "at least as likely as not" led to your current migraine diagnosis.  

3.  The "other" caluza element is that you have to have. a diagnosis by a dcotor that you have headaches, migraines, etc.  

     Normally, you get the caluza elements documented, you get service conneced.  

      A doctor "can not" invent an in service event.  It has to be documented in your records, OR, sometimes a buddy can send a letter documenting it .  

     Example:  (Lets call you "Joe Veteran" and your friend "Frank Veteran" for this example)

      I was with Joe, when we were doing drills and we were practicing hand to hand combat skills.  He fell off a truck and landed on his head.  

Later, he complained of headaches and went to sick bay.  However, the doc apparently did not treat his headaches.

     signed...Frank Veteran.  

      It usually needs to be an "eyewitness account", that he saw you fall on your head.  Or, he told you he fell on your head and he went to sick bay and complained.  

      My advice is to check your records, see if you have documentation of the caluza elements.  You will likely need to file a NOTICE of disagreement and go to the BVA arguing you had all 3 caluza elements.  

     If you have the caluza elements you should win service connection..then it will be down to symptoms (current).  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi,

thanks, I did a search and found what happened it was due to a lumbar puncture headache.

So no way that is was causing my headaches now. Almost 20yr later.

i believe now what causing my headaches is my PTSD.

- Not sure if I should start a new topic or ask here.

But having headaches denied as a primary can I claim them as secondary or once you have a condition claimed as primary it can’t be changed to secondary?

That was added as part of the VA inferred claim I did not file for it, the rater or someone in the claim process added it because I mentioned I was having headaches in my statement for PTSD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Cloudbuster Sure, You can submit a disability claim for anything. I am assuming you have a VA disability for PTSD; what is your rating? Do you have any other disabilities also approved ? What you want to do is find out what the diagnosis was by the VA specifically; that is, for example PTSD with MDD and anxiety. Your looking to see if your headaches is part of the diagnosis for your MH condition. If it isn't called out in your decision letter, you should be able to get it by requesting your rating sheet from the VA. Call 800-827-1000. Tell them you want a confirmation of your disability ratings make-up. Or, just get copies from the VA of all the notes concerning your disability. If headaches are not called out as part of your diagnosis, you should be able to claim a new disability for them. (The VA is rating your disability based on your symptoms; kinda like the more symptoms, the higher rating.) Including headaches as part of your diagnosis means that they are including that symptom as part of your comp. It can be secondary to your MH condition. Veterans re-apply for disabilities all the time after being denied. Doesn't matter whether it is primary or secondary. In fact, when submitting a claim for the first time, it is often better not to call out whether it is primary or secondary. Let the VA decide what it is. And just to add, there may be other disabilities that can be secondary to headaches, like sleep apnea, complications from meds, etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

is under code 9411 only have it as PTSD - static at 70%.

Tinnitus - 10%

and other musculoskeletals.

 

the issue the VA denied headaches as primary and I was going to claim it as secondary.

as the cause for headaches in service was the lumbar puncture I mentioned earlier but I know that not what is causing them now so I assume is imposible to have a nexus for my current headaches base on that.

As now I noticed when I’m stressed out/ anxiety attack I start having the headaches.

so not sure if I can supplement that Primary denial and treat it as a secondary.

something like during my last statement my headaches were cause by my PTSD that why I believe the rater added the Headache claim but it should have been a secondary. I believe the issue of secondary service connection was reasonable raised in the initial claim.
 

would this work to keep that date?

 

thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

Since you are not a medical physician, I suggest that you have your headaches/migraines evaluated and go from there. The true issue here is that no one can truly state why people have migraines/headaches, but a medical opinion can give their best guess of why you are having them. Migraine Test: Lumbar Puncture Or Spinal Tap.

Don’t let the VA say that you can’t claim a condition that could have started in the military.  Your migraines/headaches can also be caused by your tinnitus. I am just trying to help, but the bottom line is that you need to get a medical opinion about your migraines/headaches. You can search some on the net to see what you can find and depending on the evidence in your records, you can go from there.

 

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use