Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Big shout out to Ask Nod- our story

Rate this question


andrewdc

Question

I found Alex on this site almost 4 years ago. I had posted multiple questions as to why VA denied my aid and attendance claim SMC L.  Alex contacted me and agreed to help. He filed a new claim for smc l and of course va denied it. He then filed appeal to bva which was subsequently granted and I was awarded smc L. However I have 2 separate and distinct 100% ratings so I should have been awarded smc M. So, Alex submitted  appeal to bva which after a year they closed appeal because they thought we were appealing original bva decision. We were not appealing decision just the m versus l. So Alex filed a new claim for m and va denied. Alex filed supplemental claim and va closed the claim without even adjudicating. He filed Again and same result. He made another attempt and that was denied too. Finally Alex contacted the secretary bva, the regional office coaches and raters claiming they had no idea how to adjudicate smc claims.  Obviously he ruffled a few feathers and the truth needed to be said. Finally after more than 36 months of fighting, the VA admitted making 2 mistakes. They admitted the effective date for my original l should have been 6 months earlier and they admitted m should have been awarded when aid and attendance was granted. Bottom line- Alex knows more than va when it comes to SMC. Alex is a kind person who always listed to our concerns and always keep us in the loop. If you need thoughtful assistance with your smc and or claims in general, no one knows better than our friend Alex. 
 

 Andrew & Linda
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Andrewdc Great example of keeping at it with the VA; congrats to you and Alex. If you have a SMC situation that is really complex, I definitely would contact Alex. There are many examples posted where he has helped veterans get what they deserve. Certainly he can handle only a limited number of veteran appeals at any one time, but if you have him doing it, he is a bull dog on getting to where you need to be. Again, congrats!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Congratulations!  In football, the call it "second effort".   At hadit it we say you just keep trying until you win, never give up.  Its not news that VA does not understand their own regulations..if they fully understood and complied with them all, then neither the BVA, nor CAVC would be necessary and have to be shut down.  

I used to follow the statistics at the BVA...interestingly, only about 20 percent of claims at the Board are denied.  My math says that means 80% of the VARO decisions have one or more errors requiring reversal or remand.  80 percent wrong.  

That is an "F".  In your case, the VA re did it and made the same errors over and over.  Usually, my experience has been "the VA thinks up NEW mistakes", they get tired of remaking the old mistakes.  

However, when they DO make the same mistake over and over, they are so embarrassed they did something right for a change.  

Alex is very good at SMC.   Its obviously deliberatly complicated, Im not sure anyone completely understands SMC, and all of its nuances, except maybe CCK law, and maybe a few of the people at NVLSP who write the VBM.   It obviously requires years, and reading thousands of BVA, CAVC, and Federal Circuit decisions to fully understand this mess.  

I see at least part of the problem being The US Supreme Court.  The "Chevron deference" means that VA pretty much gets to interpret its own regulations in any manner they see fit..

As an example, CAVC remands are to be given "expeditious treatment".

Webster defines it as:

 

Quote

 

Definition of expeditious

 

: marked by or acting with prompt efficiency

 

However VA defines it as neither prompt, nor efficient, but instead they take "however long they want to complete it", if at all.  
I have a remand from 2014 which was never ever completed.  When I called em on it, they cite a 2019 regulation which required a specific form, when, in 2014 no form was required.  
 
You wont beleive how many Veterans are told their records were destroyed in a 1973 Fire... including several who did not exit military service until 1990.  That is pretty much impossible for non existant records to be burned up.  
 
 
 

 

 

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Founder

I agree Alex is great he got me to L 1/2.

Tbird
 

Founder HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran LLC - Founded Jan 20, 1997

 

HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran | Community Forum | RallyPointFaceBook | LinkedInAbout Me

 

Time Dedicated to HadIt.com Veterans and my brothers and sisters: 65,700 - 109,500 Hours Over Thirty Years

 

diary-a-mad-sailor-signature-banner.png

I am writing my memoirs and would love it if you could help a shipmate out and look at it.

I've had a few challenges, perhaps the same as you. I relate them here to demonstrate that we can learn, overcome, and find purpose in life.

The stories can be harrowing to read; they were challenging to live. Remember that each story taught me something I would need once I found my purpose, and my purpose was and is HadIt.com Veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

<<<Alex is very good at SMC.   Its obviously deliberatly complicated, Im not sure anyone completely understands SMC, and all of its nuances, except maybe CCK law, and maybe a few of the people at NVLSP who write the VBM.   It obviously requires years, and reading thousands of BVA, CAVC, and Federal Circuit decisions to fully understand this mess.  >>>

Au contraire, ma cher. I do completely understand SMC, Loyal. It only took me 9 years to learn it backwards and forwards. There are probably 8 attorneys who are  really good at this outside of me.  Sadly, VA cannot plumb its depths no matter how hard they try. They utilize the SMC Ratings Calculator computer. Therein lies the problem. Garbage in-garbage out.  I just returned from a mini-vacation last night and reread the final promulgation. VA screwed it up yet again. By moving the effective date for SMC L back from August 23, 2020 to February 12, 2020, they neglected to note he had 50% or greater ratings independently ratable until August 23, 2020 (§3.350(f)(3)) when the SMC M kicked in. That means the Veteran was entitled to SMC L 1/2 +K from Feb. 12 to August 23. It isn't much but every dollar counts when you're skating on bankruptcy ice.

Remember, VA didn't concoct SMC- Congress did. VA just converted it into unintelligible regulations. 

I just contacted the CMA in Omaha this AM and told him to tell the Coach they need to sharpen their pencils and begin anew. Next? Why, R 1 of course. I just want to get the current problem repaired before I launch another torpedo. He agreed and sent it up the ladder.

Edited by asknod

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use