Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Question

Rate this question


Billyboy

Question

I am seeing a Psychiatrist and a Psychologist. I have an open claim for 50% working on TD. The Psychiatrist wrote "Mr. ******** has been under my care for long history of mood disorder and has been complaint with his treatment. He has been suffering from depression and anxiety in addition to his physical condition related to chronic back pain, neck pain, fibromyalgia, arthritis and hypertension. He seems to be unable to hold any gainful employment.

Signed, Staff Psychiatrist. I did not use this because you all said the VA would deny because she add back, neck pain which I am not connected for. The Psychologist told me I should be 70 or maybe 100% disabled. I asked for a letter stating this and he told since i had an open claim for TD he could not write such a letter? "It would be inproper"? What say ye all. bill

0% Hearing loss, 10% Tinnitus, 70% MDD, 100% TDIU Thanks to the vet (Gaylon) that help me get started, the county officer (Charles) and all the great people on HADIT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

He has been suffering from depression and anxiety in addition to his physical condition related to chronic back pain, neck pain, fibromyalgia, arthritis and hypertension. He seems to be unable to hold any gainful employment.

Billyboy,

I read that your psychiatrist states in addition to. I don't read that he is stating that your other illness, which are not service connected are causing the depression and anxiety.

This is my take on this.

Let's see how the others read this, but I would think that this report should be turned in.

Josephine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would file the claim, and state provide clinical refrences to depression linked to chronic pain. There are numerous studies which show that most people who suffer from chronic pain, also suffer from depression/mood disorders due to the pain. These same studies show that in the absence of pain, these symptoms of depression normally abate.

I'd file it based upon the link between chronic pain, which you do have an injury which causes it that seems to be service connected already or is pending. I wouldn't try to get the Psych to say anything else, they normally refuse. However you can ask him if he believes that there is a causation or link between you service connected injuries and you chronic pain from these already service connected injuries. Simply put ask him what he believes is CAUSING your mood disoreder, and ask him to annotate it into his notes.

Either way I'd file the claim.

Bob Smith

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't they normally indicate this in the axis? Most that I have seen indicate in axis one - mood disorder/anxiety NOS due to general medical condition

Then in axis four (I think it is four) they list your general medical conditions ie back problem, chronic pain, hypertension, etc......

I do not really know for sure but like I said the mental evals that I have seen look something like the above. Now to me that would indicate that mental condition is due to the conditions listed in axis four. However, if some of them are NSC I guess the rater might question what amount each contributes to the mental diagnosis.

This is really a question in answer to the original question I guess. Sorry maybe Bob or one of the others can clarify my confusing post hahshahaha......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am 50% MDD, 10% Tinnitus and 0% loss of hearing = 60%

"The Psychologist told me I should be 70 or maybe 100% disabled. I asked for a letter stating this and he told since i had an open claim for TD he could not write such a letter"? "It would be inproper"?

Can you tell my why the shrink does NOT want to write a letter for me? Is it something that is not done while you have an open case? bill

0% Hearing loss, 10% Tinnitus, 70% MDD, 100% TDIU Thanks to the vet (Gaylon) that help me get started, the county officer (Charles) and all the great people on HADIT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It may be due to what lots of vets encounter in the VA system: One VA doctor does not care to go against/contradict what some other VA doctor says...you know, stepping on a fellow doctor's toes as it were.

IMO, it has nothing to do with a case being "open" because if it did, then how could a vet send in any more/new evidence during an open claims case if it weren't allowed? You need to send whatever helpful evidence comes up during the claims process whenever you get it...and you can...there's no regulation preventing that. And a case that is "closed" means a decision has been made...so how is your new evidence -- in this case a statement from the Ph.D. -- going to help you THEN when you had it to submit BEFORE the decision was made but couldn't because the case was "open"? It doesn't make any sense.

I think it's simply because the VA Psychologist does not want to make waves with the VA Psychiatrist. It would be "improper" only in the sense that "in-house rules" are not to cause discord within the "team" so they tend to cover each other.

AFAIK, there is no legal reason why one VA doctor can't contradict another VA doctor...it's probably the peer pressure thing going on. It would take some guts for a doctor to buck the system, too, and I think few VA docs probably have that. So they just don't want to rock the boat.

JMO,

-- John D.

Edited by cloudcroft

70% TDIU/P&T

Army - RVN - 1969-70 (10th Cav/4th ID, II Corps RVN)

USCG - Galveston, TX - 1976-78 (USCGC Valiant, WMEC 621)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am with Josephine on this one. If you have SC for the OTHER conditions - or SOME of them - they shouldn't be able to deny secondary just because the psychologist also mentioned back and neck (which are not SC).

I think it would be close to impossible to separate out how much of your depression and anxiety is related to your SC conditions and how much is related to you NON Sc conditions - therefore they would have to attribute the whole amount to the SC conditions.

IF you had very minor SC conditions and a HORRID back condition - that would be different.

I think it is horrid that the VA has a system in which a vet is afraid to submit supporting evidence because of one line that the VA might take out of context. However, that IS the way it is - so you were wise to check it out before sending it.

The veteran benefits manual suggests vets get copies of their own records and only send in the ones that support the claim. You are NOT REQUIRED to send evidence which does NOT support your claim.

But again - it is a poor system when a vet has to fear sending a very favorable statement because the VA can have a tendency to pull a tiny part out of the statement and quote it out of context.

Free

He has been suffering from depression and anxiety in addition to his physical condition related to chronic back pain, neck pain, fibromyalgia, arthritis and hypertension. He seems to be unable to hold any gainful employment.

Billyboy,

I read that your psychiatrist states in addition to. I don't read that he is stating that your other illness, which are not service connected are causing the depression and anxiety.

This is my take on this.

Let's see how the others read this, but I would think that this report should be turned in.

Josephine

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use