Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Service Connection Due To

Rate this question


Berta

Question

Yikes-this issue came up here today but when I left the BVA web site I couldnt remember what post!

Service connection can be obtained due to inservice aggravation of pre-existing condition as well as aggravation after service of a NSC condition-due to an established SC condition.

Example of inservice aggravation-

http://www.va.gov/vetapp08/files1/0808223.txt

The veteran acknowledges that his perforated right ear drum disability began in childhood prior to service. Based on the service medical records and the veteran's statements, the Board finds clear and unmistakable evidence that the perforated right ear drum disability existed prior to service. The appellant, however, argues that his disability was aggravated by his military service. The service medical records note that the disability existed prior to service and that during service the veteran's right ear was treated for an infection caused by water exposure. While the appellant's perforated right ear drum disability predated service, the veteran may be awarded service connection based on in-service aggravation. In order to establish service connection the veteran must provide evidence of a current disability, an in-service aggravation, and a nexus between the current disability and an in-service aggravation. A preexisting injury or disease will be considered to have been aggravated by service where there is an increase in disability during service. Aggravation may not be conceded where the disability underwent no increase in severity during service on the basis of all the evidence of record pertaining to manifestations of the disability prior to, during, and subsequent to service. 38 C.F.R. § 3.306. The veteran submitted a December 2004 letter from Dr. Yanagisawa who opined that it was likely that the veteran's right ear condition was aggravated and worsened while in the military. In August 2007, a VA examiner opined that exposure to water in the military aggravated the pre existing right tympanic membrane perforation. The medical evidence is far from conclusive with respect to the issue on appeal. However, VA has not failed to meet the burden of showing no in-service aggravation of the preservice disability. Indeed, the evidence is at least in a state of equipoise relative to the question of aggravation of the perforated right ear drum disability. Thus, service connection for perforated right ear drum disability is warranted. ORDER Entitlement to service connection for a perforated right ear drum disability is granted. This vet below claimed aggravation rather than secondary-http://www.va.gov/vetapp07/files3/0726519.txt

CONCLUSION OF LAW Service connection for chronic renal insufficiency based on aggravation from the service connected diabetes mellitus is warranted. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 5107 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.102, 3.310 (2006).

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Part IV, Subpart ii, Chapter 2, Section B. Determining Service ...

d. Definition: Presumption of Soundness

The presumption of soundness means that veteran will be considered to have been in sound condition when examined, accepted, and enrolled for service except

• as to defects, infirmities, or disorders noted at entrance into service, or

• where clear and unmistakable (obvious or manifest) evidence demonstrates that an injury or

disease

 existed prior to service, and

 was not aggravated by such service.

"Don't give up. Don't ever give up." Jimmy V

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[Code of Federal Regulations]

[Title 38, Volume 1]

[Revised as of July 1, 2008]

From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access

[CITE: 38CFR3.306]

[Page 231-232]

TITLE 38--PENSIONS, BONUSES, AND VETERANS' RELIEF

CHAPTER I--DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

PART 3_ADJUDICATION--Table of Contents

Subpart A_Pension, Compensation, and Dependency and Indemnity

Compensation

Sec. 3.306 Aggravation of preservice disability.

(a) General. A preexisting injury or disease will be considered to

have been aggravated by active military, naval, or air service, where

there is an increase in disability during such service, unless there is

a specific finding that the increase in disability is due to the natural

progress of the disease.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1153)

[[Page 232]]

(b) Wartime service; peacetime service after December 31, 1946.

Clear and unmistakable evidence (obvious or manifest) is required to

rebut the presumption of aggravation where the preservice disability

underwent an increase in severity during service. This includes medical

facts and principles which may be considered to determine whether the

increase is due to the natural progress of the condition. Aggravation

may not be conceded where the disability underwent no increase in

severity during service on the basis of all the evidence of record

pertaining to the manifestations of the disability prior to, during and

subsequent to service.

(1) The usual effects of medical and surgical treatment in service,

having the effect of ameliorating disease or other conditions incurred

before enlistment, including postoperative scars, absent or poorly

functioning parts or organs, will not be considered service connected

unless the disease or injury is otherwise aggravated by service.

(2) Due regard will be given the places, types, and circumstances of

service and particular consideration will be accorded combat duty and

other hardships of service. The development of symptomatic

manifestations of a preexisting disease or injury during or proximately

following action with the enemy or following a status as a prisoner of

war will establish aggravation of a disability.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1154)

© Peacetime service prior to December 7, 1941. The specific

finding requirement that an increase in disability is due to the natural

progress of the condition will be met when the available evidence of a

nature generally acceptable as competent shows that the increase in

severity of a disease or injury or acceleration in progress was that

normally to be expected by reason of the inherent character of the

condition, aside from any extraneous or contributing cause or influence

peculiar to military service. Consideration will be given to the

circumstances, conditions, and hardships of service.

[26 FR 1580, Feb. 24, 1961, as amended at 57 FR 59296, Dec. 15, 1992]

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Can you get Service Connection for aggravation caused by VA?

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yikes-this issue came up here today but when I left the BVA web site I couldnt remember what post!

Service connection can be obtained due to inservice aggravation of pre-existing condition as well as aggravation after service of a NSC condition-due to an established SC condition.

Example of inservice aggravation-

http://www.va.gov/vetapp08/files1/0808223.txt

As a 3 time wounded Viet Vet I find that it is one thing to claim a pre-existing condition and another huge problem to get it accepted and receive compensation......However, there are so many brave veterans that have this sincere problem so I say give them their due until the VA discovers it to be non compensiable....We Americans owe so much to our Vets..If it weren't for the Vets we couldn't write here or go to the our local store to purchase Political Magazines or worship in the Church of our choice..

God Bless our Troops and all of our Veterans

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Larry-

SCd issues only. But not for everyday illnesses like.........ear infections......as the example that was provided. That crosses the ridiculous line for me. That person knew of their ear condition...they could have worn ear plugs to keep water out of their ears.

I just read of many things being claimed that shock me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use