Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Diabetes Secondary Rejected

Rate this question


Papa

Question

B) I got back my decision for Diabetes and it was denied. The reason was that I did not show it in my medical records. When, I submitted my claim I thought that I had given the VA access to ALL my medical records. I thought that since I was tested positive for Diabetes and most diffently in a AO zone, this would be a no brainer. WRONG! The VA only looked at my records through 1982! So, if they want to deny a claim, all they need to do is go back far enough and waalaa :P . Now, I will need to do a NOD.

Papa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Berta:

Maybe they are clearing the decks. I am amazed at how many who have won claims this time of year. Usually in November they grant a bunch of claims cause they are starting the new year. Yes I still believe in the 4% cap.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I definitely feel they are whipping out some awards faster Pete- but the award letters are either all wrong or they then seem to stall on paying the comp.

I almost expect when they get my April 2009 award letter finally right- they might declare me Incompetent!

One more way to stall the paying of the cash.

My award letter from the RO came so fast after the BVA decision-I knew it would be messed up- they didn't even seem to read the BVA decision at all-and they forgot the money.

A disgrace.

I had received 3-4 letters from Both Chairman HVAC Filner and James Terry-CHairman BVA on my case.I didnt respond because I wanted the proper award letter first.

Last week I figured VA is waiting for me to croak so I sent the award letter to both of them -telling them how we are being victimized by a system that has to re-do what they could have done right in the first place- a prime reason for the unconscionable backlog.

They were involved in my claim only do to my past testimony at the Sub Committee on claims.Medical evidence is what wins a claims-not Congressional intervention-

but the recent RO decision gave me prime facie evidence of what my testimony was about and thousands of us are being victimized by careless work at the ROs.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got a response from IRIS today, and they basically admitted that whoever put the letter together really made a bad error. They also mentioned that I'm suppose to have a Tinnitus test on Aug 13th, wonder when they are going to tell me where <_< . I did receive a call from the local VA, but they did not leave a message, I called the number on the caller ID. It was first press one for English, press one for this, press two for this up to about six times or numbers. I pressed them all and talked to everyone, but no one called me B) . Surprised? Nope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you have a service officer? If so, contact him/her to see if they know why they are trying to contact you. You can call the 800 number an have them send a message to the RO that you missed the call and if possible can the individual who tried to call, please try again. At least they have a step in the right direction.

"Don't give up. Don't ever give up." Jimmy V

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

For every success story we here on Hadit we don't hear about the guys who use the VSO's and get denied and just quit. I think the VA may be clearing the decks by throwing vets overboard. I bet a lot of younger vets just shrug their shoulders and get on with their lives after denials thinking that 10% does not matter anyway. It comes back to haunt them 30 years later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John999 your post hit me with a ton of bricks, truthful bricks that is. I had put in for a claim against DM II prior to this claim, and was ask to submit more evidence. My doctor wrote a statement saying that I had DM II and most likely caused by Agent Orange. I will not get into my other aliments as it would take to long. But, the VA and some, not all of the VSO both know how to fustrate Veterans. My claim is proof that the VA does not look at new, old or any type of evidence. They stop where ever they want to stop, and I must be the king of nieve people. Thanks for the reality check.

Papa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use