Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

New Ao Presumptive

Rate this question


Berta

Question

I foresee problems in the new Ischemic AO heart disease presumptive disability-

this case shows what I mean.

Veterans might sure need to rely on ECHO reports and documented Ejection Fractions-and other evidence of atherosclerotic heart disease because heart disease can have many types of names yet only the "ischemic" type is within the new AO presumptive addition.

"The Veteran's death certificate shows that he died from

congestive heart failure. The VA physician who wrote the VA medical opinion in April 2009 concluded that the Veteran's congestive heart failure was not due to ischemic heart disease or hypertensive vascular disease. However, he made no mention of the February 1986 private medical record showing nonspecific ST-T wave changes, the October 1986 chest X-rays showing arteriosclerosis, or the diagnoses of generalized arteriosclerosis and essential hypertension in January 1987. His opinion appears to have been based on an incomplete history, and it is not sufficient to rebut the presumption of service incurrence for atherosclerotic heart disease and hypertensive vascular disease. See 38 C.F.R. § 3.307(d). During the Veteran's lifetime, he was diagnosed as having arteriosclerosis and hypertension. Since atherosclerotic heart disease and hypertensive vascular disease (and their complications including congestive heart failure) are connected to service by presumption in light of the Veteran's POW status, and he died from congestive heart failure, service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death is warranted. Reasonable doubt has been resolved in the appellant's favor. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107; Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 49 (1991). ORDER Service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death is granted. From:http://www.va.gov/vetapp09/files3/0924239.txt

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

bump

"Do one thing every day that scares you." Eleanor Roosevelt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
Hello again Berta,

I just got off the phone for a half an hour beleive it with my VA regional office.

I really wanted to know how the VA was going to apply the new rules on the IHD but the nice lady went ahead and put in an informal claim for an earlier effective date for me.

In 2003 when I was granted DM2 and PN I was also granted a noncompensation for HBP I guess that means 0%.

I have only been given a stress walking test with and ekg and that time and a chest exray nothing else. I know my blood work showed hi choelstreail reading and that was about it that I can remember. When I appealed they just denied with the same material and sent me a SOC. I will have to go back and look at that.

I still have not been able to track down the Fast Letter for the Heart Disease if someone has that or knows where a Link would be appreciated.

Thanks again, Stillhere

Stillhere, you dont have to worry about the new heart disease criteria. Your SC'd for HTN and you should get it anyway.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I just got off the phone for a half an hour beleive it with my VA regional office.

I really wanted to know how the VA was going to apply the new rules on the IHD but the nice lady went ahead and put in an informal claim for an earlier effective date for me. "

WOW- you must have some good internal phone numbers.Did they say they would send you a copy of the informal claim?

The new AO Ischemic regs are not in granite yet but I will try to find the Cardiovascular VA training letter-it should be here hadit and I know I have it here in a file...somewhere...in the stack of 20 years of VAOLA.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I just got off the phone for a half an hour beleive it with my VA regional office.

I really wanted to know how the VA was going to apply the new rules on the IHD but the nice lady went ahead and put in an informal claim for an earlier effective date for me. "

WOW- you must have some good internal phone numbers.Did they say they would send you a copy of the informal claim?

The new AO Ischemic regs are not in granite yet but I will try to find the Cardiovascular VA training letter-it should be here hadit and I know I have it here in a file...somewhere...in the stack of 20 years of VAOLA.

Hi Berta, I down loaded it way back when you posted it on line. I just need to find it on my computer.

I guess it all is going to depend on if VA is going to allow Nehmer on this condition or not?

Edited by stillhere
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Stillhere

Are you already SC'ed for heart disease? You say the VA put in a claim for an EED for heart disease? In order to get an EED you have to be SC'ed already. The idea that the VA is going to put in a claim for you over the phone would not make me feel all that secure. Do you have a DX for heart disease secondary to DMII? I got SC'ed for CAD secondary to DMII. It is not automatic by any means. The ischemic thing is presumptive now so I guess Nehmer would apply if you have already claimed heart disease caused by AO. If you have not claimed it then it won't apply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Stillhere

Are you already SC'ed for heart disease? You say the VA put in a claim for an EED for heart disease? In order to get an EED you have to be SC'ed already. The idea that the VA is going to put in a claim for you over the phone would not make me feel all that secure. Do you have a DX for heart disease secondary to DMII? I got SC'ed for CAD secondary to DMII. It is not automatic by any means. The ischemic thing is presumptive now so I guess Nehmer would apply if you have already claimed heart disease caused by AO. If you have not claimed it then it won't apply. Just because you are SC'ed for hbp does not mean automatic SC for subsequent heart problems. You need a medical opinion for almost all secondary conditions. Do you even know if you have heart disease or are you just filing to protect yourself under Nehmer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use