Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

I Won! I Won! After A Four Year And Five Day Battle!

Rate this question


jamescripps2

Question

On November 2, 2009, I won the first ever VA claim for Agent Orange exposure, "inside the Continental United States." The claim was granted for Chloracne, Diabetes and Heart Disease with ICD implant, as due to Agent Orange exposure at Fort Gordon GA., in the years 1967-1969. You will be able to read the Board Of Veterans Appeals detailed decision along with the supporting evidence at WWW.va.gov in a couple of months when it is posted. From the web site choose Board of Veterans Appeals, then click on Decisions. Next type in the search box Docket No.08-11 937.

Due to the AICD implant, Class 3 CHF and a LVEF of 25% there should be a 100% P&T award.

Other than a $15.00 Medicare copay, here and there, no money was spent on an IMO, so take heart, you don't have to be rich to win!

James M. Cripps,

Vietnam Veterans OF America Tennessee Agent Orange Committee Chairman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

This is a BIGGIE!

They also awarded AO in Alaska (I posted that here-decision came -get this- from the AMC!)

but this is within continental USA!!!!!

Mike I was thinking the same thing-ischemic heart disease-which is already added to the AO presumptives.

Now I wonder how many pending vet's claims do show ischemic heart disease that VA would have to consider under this new presumptive---but I fear VAROs will not even take the new reg into account if they can deny the claims under a different basis.

I know the BVA would.

I sent Larry Scott this news-=hope he posts it-

this is BIG for the veteran's community-

and proves as James said here at hadit I think-

PERSISTENCE pays off-

If you have the evidence you MUST persist until you get the right decision.

My award was first of it's kind too-1151 rendered moot by direct AO SC-

It went on the BVA web site fairly quickly-

so this award James got might not take too long to be posted there.

INCREDIBLE!1!!!!!!!!!!!!

and NOTHING is impossible with the VA.

DOD has confirmed testing of AO in many spots in the US of A-----I posted that info here many times over the years - but I never saw any vet succeed like James did.

This is a major victory for vets as many claiming USA exposure might have a chance now to prove their cases if they can prove they were in the testing itself or maybe had duty in same area after testing was done.

I bet they used AO around officers quarters and the golf courses as well as in war game scenarios.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

past discussion here at hadit:

http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?show...hl=jamescripps2

there are links there that might help someone else put there

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

James, I too remember your battle. You are an inspiration to other Vets who have had AO exposure in the CONUS.

I see a 100 percent P and T with the EF of 25. I believe an SMC is also in store.

Enjoy the award and take care of yourself.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
This is a BIGGIE!

They also awarded AO in Alaska (I posted that here-decision came -get this- from the AMC!)

but this is within continental USA!!!!!

Mike I was thinking the same thing-ischemic heart disease-which is already added to the AO presumptives.

Now I wonder how many pending vet's claims do show ischemic heart disease that VA would have to consider under this new presumptive---but I fear VAROs will not even take the new reg into account if they can deny the claims under a different basis.

I know the BVA would.

I sent Larry Scott this news-=hope he posts it-

this is BIG for the veteran's community-

and proves as James said here at hadit I think-

PERSISTENCE pays off-

If you have the evidence you MUST persist until you get the right decision.

My award was first of it's kind too-1151 rendered moot by direct AO SC-

It went on the BVA web site fairly quickly-

so this award James got might not take too long to be posted there.

INCREDIBLE!1!!!!!!!!!!!!

and NOTHING is impossible with the VA.

DOD has confirmed testing of AO in many spots in the US of A-----I posted that info here many times over the years - but I never saw any vet succeed like James did.

This is a major victory for vets as many claiming USA exposure might have a chance now to prove their cases if they can prove they were in the testing itself or maybe had duty in same area after testing was done.

I bet they used AO around officers quarters and the golf courses as well as in war game scenarios.

I agree Berta this is HUGE Berta what if they used already standing decisons that link AO diabetes 2 to cardiac and SC as secondary to DM2 and the Shinseki new presumptive ruling has nothing to do with this decision we may be getting the horse before the cart it is still a great win as being the first known case of AO awarded from AO use in the United States but the nexus maybe the same that BVA has been awarding to Nam vets for a long time we need to read the decision to learn the full extent

Edited by Testvet

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

That is great news. Now does the new reg for heart disease make an opening for widows to file DIC if their RVN spouses died from heart disease 5 years ago? If the VA grants an AO claim for CONUS I think the walls may be coming down on a lot of other AO claims for navy and others. It is sort of like the Berlin Wall. Once one brick is knocked down the whole wall may come down. We RVN vets are not getting any younger. I was at Ft Stewart and Ft Benning. Did they use AO there as well?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use