Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

I Got Sced!

Rate this question


11cvolley

Question

I Put in my claim for ptsd in June 2010. 1-26-2011 it went to decision phase. Its been with the rating board for over a month now. Anyone had this issue? I did provide them with every document that wasn't in my c-file that supports my claim. I just really need some input. This is driving me nuts.

Edited by 11cvolley
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 151
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Well, maybe things are going to just proceed and you will get your rating. I don't know exactly what else you can do now. Maybe just wait and see. The VA might send you for a C&P exam. How strong was your MST evidence? What could your congressman add that you have not already given to the VA? I am just guessing now because I don't know what they are doing. If for nothing else the VA uses the C&P exam to determine the degree of disability. The rater uses the C&P and the other evidence to rate you according to criteria from VA rules and regulations. The C&P is one of the main ways the VA gathers evidence of your mental condition and your ability to handle your finances. Others may have different ideas but as far as I know when your claim goes to rating board it is ready to rate, or should be ready. I don't think I would submit any new evidence or ask congressman for help now. Just wait and see what happens so you don't slow down the decision. Maybe this has to do with new regs for rating PTSD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My biggest fear was the rater not properly applying the rules for ptsd claims due to rape. Back when I was in service I got help from my state senator and he was informed of the rapes and torture. Maybe my congressman's office got in touch with him idk.

As for how strong my evidence for mst goes I have every piece of evidence but mp reports of rape and torture. No medical records other than my doctor on base noting negative change in my behavior. Such as being withdrawn, emotional, no eye contact, and constant request for a transfer to medical hold. I do have an mp report of theft involving assault but I did not mention the mst part. Really hard to come out and say mst when they question you in front of several "peers" and when the people who assaulted me lived less than 50 yards away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Did you tell anyone else about the MST? Their statements could be evidence especially if they say you told them shortly after the attacks. Any one in your command who knew what happened could make statements for you. Perhaps, as you say your congressman's evidence is being used. If you told your congressman about the MST that is evidence if he/she did an investigation of some sort. I am no expert on MST. I know that the VA runs on evidence. What constitutes evidence in MST cases others here know better than I. I was just wanting to make sure that you get your exam and that the VA does make a decision on the MST/PTSD and that this claimed condition does not get lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you.

I reported it to my "rear d" Sargent after the unit deployed. (a few days after the last assault.) He told me that I wasn't assaulted sexually or otherwise. That he didn't want to hear anymore about it. His exact words were, "I know you want out on a honorable discharge." "If you want to keep it that way then don't cause any problems." "I can make your stay here hell and much longer." Well he did make it hell. Out of 40 soldiers on rear d I was forced to do 24 hour cq duty every other day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use