Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

New Member

Rate this question


Jimmy the socks

Question

I am retired Air Force. First 14 yrs communications using Trichloroethylene (TCE) daily to degrease equipment. Never instructed to use protective safety gear. Liver enzymes were elevated the year before retirement and higher each year after that. I was not informed that my labs were abnormal. NEVER drank alcohol and stayed physically fit. My triglycerides and cholesterol were high during active duty however. Shortly after retirement developed type 2 Diabetes and at a routine blood lab was told my liver enzymes were very high. Had a biopsy and was told I have NASH, Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. All tests proved my condition was not hereditary. I am now in 4th end stage cirrhosis and will require a liver transplant very soon. I am on the list now. Crazy for a guy who never drinks alcohol as most people associate cirrhosis with alcoholism. Is there anyone out there who was exposed to TCE who has a liver disease? It is difficult to find others like myself who can understand and be supportive. I am awaiting the VA's decision for my disability benefits. Supplied them with all labs, active duty and retired, my biopsy and other films, a nexus letter which states "At lease as likely as not" that TCE caused my liver disease", buddy letters to prove I had my hands in the stuff daily, medical journals, and much more. I gave the VA a letter from the VA doctors stating I am "Unemployable". Can anyone offer any assistance on documented info and your story as well. Feel free to E-mail me directly at jim570150@yahoo.com. Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Glad to have you on board Jimmy.

Sorry to hear about your situation, and even sorrier I can't give you any help on your issue. It would help you to post your questions on the (VA CLAIMS RESEARCH) Forem. There you would get alot more attention from members here on Hadit. Good luck Jimmy!

!!!BROKEN ARROW!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Welcome to Hadit and although I have no experience with your type of claim I have seen that with proper Medical Opinion that you have linking it to your service should help win the claim for you.

Do you get SSD and how long have you been out of the Service?

Good Luck

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm exactly like you except I spent 4 years in the stuff. My liver enzymes eventually came back down. I was a drinker but quit when I had my biopsy. My dr. said NASH was not from drinking. He did not say what it was from or why it went away. I'm thankful that it did. My diabetes is worsening. I've been on the pills for 6 years and now I'm at the daily max before I will need injections.

Luckily, my supervisor in the air force documented my exposures (jet fuel, pd-680, polyurethane, zinc chromate primer, isocyanytes). I have a claim in now for sleep apnea, lung disease and sinusitis due to exposure. Even though I had these in service and exposure is documented in SMRs I still paid for an IME.

I think that if you go in with enough evidence for them to grant you benefits they will do it. If you start with the bare minimum and expect them to give you exams that connect the dots you are doomed from the start. All is not lost if they deny you first time around. Don't appeal. You have a year from denial to submit new evidence. I would get an IME that connects your current condition to service. Submit the IME and request reconsideration based on new evidence.

make sure your IME dr has a current copy of your claims file and does an exam on you. If not, they will develop to deny by saying it is not good enough for a decision. They will then send you to thier expert who will say "at least as likely as not" service related.

read some BVA decisions. It is thier patented move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"a nexus letter which states "At lease as likely as not" that TCE caused my liver disease",

What type of expertise do they have to back up their opinion?

Did they cite any studies or medical literature to support the opinion?

Did they give a complete medical rationale for their opinion?

It would be good if you go to the BVA web site and access other claims for this type of exposure to see what type of evidence the VA is looking for.

Your IMO might be enough if it complies with the IMO format (here in our IMO forum)and the opinion is strong enough medically to support this claim.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

forgot- did any post service employment expose you to the same type of chemicals?

VA uses post service employment exposure against these types of claims sometimes.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use