Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

For Berta And Others...request For Increase And Iu And Imo

Rate this question


joeserp

Question

Sorry this is so long..Wanted to try to give a complete picture.

Currently 60% combined. 30% for Colitis and six 10% for Tinnitus, scarring of face, hypertension, Laceration of right wrist, left and right carpal tunnel.

Have applied for increase and IU, reporting my Colitis has got worse, to include feelings of depression and fecal incontinence. Sent the VA copies of my Medical Records for the past year from the GI doctor.

Received a letter back from VA asking me to send them a signed VCAA document, signed VA forms allowing them to contact my doctor’s and supporting documents saying the fecal incontinence and depression are related to my service connected disability.

Spoke to my GI doctor (non VA), tried to explain the importance of using key words such as, “More likely than, or At least as Likely”. Was advised he does not like to do letters like this as he is there to treat and cure, or something like that.

Well, he did give me a letter that says, I have Ulcerative Colitis that is poorly controlled, That I am scheduled to begin treatment with biologic in hopes that my colitis can be brought under better control. He said, my fecal incontinence appears to be related to my diarrhea and specifically to my left-sided colitis disease. Adding, this patient has a Chronic Condition that will require ongoing treatment.

I also saw a VA Psychiatrist – First Visit. He said

Axis I: Major Depressive Disorder, single episode, mild to moderate, likely related to

his Ulcerated Colitis.

Axis II: Deferred

Axis III: Ulcerated Colitis, hypertension, hyperglycemia

Axis IV: Moderate to severe

Axis V: GAF 60

I have not worked for almost 5 years so no letters from previous employers.

I have three C&P’s scheduled. So far have found out 1 of them are for Psych, other is for Hearing, don’t know what the other one is for.

Now for the IMO

I am in the process of getting an IMO.

In the past when I submitted a claim, all or part was denied and when I submitted a NOD, I had better luck. I also hear this happens often.

QUESTION:

If the IMO is good, should I submit it now, or should I hold on to it and wait to see what the results are and if needed submit it with the NOD?

Thanks

Joe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

“If the IMO is good, should I submit it now, or should I hold on to it and wait to see what the results are and if needed submit it with the NOD .”

If the IMO is good and conforms to the IMO criteria (in our IMO forum)I would send it in ASAP with a 21-4138 as a cover letter to support the claim.

But you haven't been denied yet-

“He said, my fecal incontinence appears to be related to my diarrhea and specifically to my left-sided colitis disease. Adding, this patient has a Chronic Condition that will require ongoing treatment.”

This isn't exactly what VA wants as an IMO but it certainly ties in the fecal problem with the SC

colitis.

“Axis I: Major Depressive Disorder, single episode, mild to moderate, likely related to

his Ulcerated Colitis. “

This too can help the claim but the single episode part concerns me.Then again it appears that you will be getting more treatment for this.

“I have not worked for almost 5 years so no letters from previous employers.” Does the form say you still have to list those employers?

Do you get Social Security disability?

If so is it for exactly the same SC conditions you have now?

And if so, does VA know of the SSA award?

“I have three C&P’s scheduled. So far have found out 1 of them are for Psych, other is for Hearing, don’t know what the other one is for.”

Try to get the results of those C & Ps as soon as they are prepared.

It is possible that they could render an award and if not- the C & P results should be something the IMO doctor has, in order to medically argue with what they say.

Then again regardless of what the C & Ps say, a strong IMO could potentially rebutt anything they use to deny.

If the IMO supports a finding of unemployability due to SC conditions, that will be excellent TDIU evidence.

In my opinion you have evidence already that does link the depressive disorder and the fecal problem to the SC colitis.Make sure you send the private doctor's opinion with proof of mailing and a 21-4138 brief cover letter telling them this is evidence for your claim.(I assume he put this on his formal letterhead)

I would hate to see you spend IMO money at this point if your claim doesn't require an IMO-

particularly since you are set for those C & P exams.

One of my IMOs was from a former VA neuro and it was a statement he made to me in email after I spent 8 months looking for him.A decade had passed since he had treated my husband and then went into private practice but he remembered my husband's hospitalization well.(He was the only VA doctor at this VAMC who didnt commit malpractice while treating my husband there and his suggestion for further treatment had been ignored)

Although his email statement was very brief, Dr. Bash, my other IMO doc called him and asked him to put the statement on his letterhead which he did and sent that to Dr. Bash who incorporated his statement into my initial formal IMO.

The BVA weighed the former VA neuro's statement with great weight as it corroborated the other medical evidence.

So while the opinion you have from the private doc isn't perfect-it still holds the key factors for secondary SC.

The C & P exams might well go OK here and VA might consider you unemployable due to the SC conditions.

I hope others chime in.

I spent 4,000 on IMOs and then had paid 1750 more for another one I didnt need.The award came before it was even prepared.

The VA neuro email IMO was a freeby.

I never regret these costs but hate to see any vet pay for an IMO that perhaps the medical evidence would award without the IMO.

“Axis III: Ulcerated Colitis, hypertension, hyperglycemia”

Is the hyperglycemia controlled?

Hyperglycemia s a symptom that VA doesnt SC. If it turns into full blown diabetes mellitus , that is different as DMII is presumptive to any incountry Vietnam vet.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If your claim is pretty strong you might wait for your decision and then get a doctor to craft the IMO to rebutt exactly the VA decision. This is a step-by-step deal like any legal process. After all your C&P exams the ball is in the VA's court until you get a decision. I went from 10%, to 30%, to 70% to TDIU over a number of years. I was appealing all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For Berta and John999

Thanks for taking the time to respond.

Not sure if it matters, but the VA Psych put me on Paxil.

I am not on SSDI. I applied (thinking I was qualified) and was denied because I have not worked and do not have the necessary credits. I stupidly thought I was qualifed since I have been drawing a Navy Retirement for 20 years.

My three C&P's are scheduled for the end of the month.

I have already mailed out the Cashier's Check to the Doctor for the IMO.

I expect to get the IMO about a week before I go to the C&P's.

Not knowing what the IMO will say, I am thinking, I should hold on to it until I get copies of the C&P's.

Then I can compare both and decide.

Any opinions on this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the IMO is strong maybe you should bring it to the C & Ps.

Some C & P docs might not want to consider it but some of them might take into their consideration what your IMO says.

Does the IMO doc have a Curriculum Vitae they can attach to the IMO?

CVs from IMO doctors or at least a statement as to their credentials, any seminars they attended or spoke at, any abstracts they have written etc etc, all helps support that their credentials and expertise outweigh or can match that of any VA C & P examiner.

I ran a local well known endocrinologist through healthgrades for a few bucks and told the vet to send it with his IMO to VA as he was too proud to give any credentials for a local vet I helped.He thought the VA had heard of how brilliant he was.

I also ran a VA endocrinologist through healthgrades for my last claim.My IMO had an 11 page CV attached and the VA doctor had nothing in her background at healthgrades to come close to it.

Also the next C & P I had to combat was done by a PA.PAs can be very good but they do not have MD after their names.

I rebutted this exam and the BVA rejected it because,in spite of overwhelmng medical evidence , the examiner's opinion was to speculative and held no medical facts that would go against the claim.

Sorry about the SSDI- I think maybe one has to have worked within 5 years of applying for SSDI.

Have you checked into any possible CRDP eligibility?

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Filing claims with the VA is not an exact science. You just get all the evidence you can and file your claim. Persistence is what wins these things in the long run. Keep appealing and getting more evidence until you win. I read posts here all the time about how long this or that phase of the process should take and that is all bunk. You just fight it until the end however long it takes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My UC is rated at 10% with Anxiety/Depression as secondary to the UC. I just put it to get an increase for UC and Anxiety/Depression, I was originally rated at discharge from the Army @ 10% even though this was the primary condition used for discharge and my medical records stated unresponsive to treatment. Im lost on how the VA determines these things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use