Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Extra Scheduler Review

Rate this question


deanbrt

Question

Well, I guess I am pretty depressed right now. I was told today, the Director of C&Ps opinion was not favorable. I just don't understand. their own C&P exam of me was favorable and met the criteria. See below.

I just don't understand, Linda.It all seems cruel now. I was told verbally this morning that my file is in DesMoines and the opinion of the Director of C&P is not favorable, even in theface of a favorable C&P exam that is consistent with VA regulations and therule that the benefit of the doubt goes to the veteran. How can that be?

So now my appeal for secondary that has been all the way to CAVCand back over the course of 5 years goes yet again to the Board of VeteransAppeals, now along with this claim for IU. Meanwhile Our financial circumstancebecomes more desperate and my personal health even worse. My heart went out ofrhythm in August and I will see a cardiologist tomorrow at the Iowa City VAMC.They will probably recommend trying to shock it back into rhythm after puttingme on blood thinners to prepare for it…..

Dean Xxxxxxxxxx

xxxx Colxxxx Drive

Cedar Falls, IA 50613

Phone: 319-xxx-xxxx

Service Number and c file number: xxx-xx-xxxx

Thanks for any assistance you can provide.

It is theestablished policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs that all veterans whoare unable to secure and follow a substantially gainful occupation by reason ofservice-connected disabilities shall be rated totally disabled. Therefore,rating boards should submit to the Director, Compensation and Pension Service,for

extra-scheduler consideration all cases of veteranswho are unemployable by reason of service-connected disabilities, but who fail to meet the percentage standards set forth inparagraph (a) of this section. The rating board will include a full statement as to theveteran's service-connected disabilities, employment history, educational andvocational attainment and all other factors having a bearing on the issue.

My C&Pservice examination in late April for my service-related injuries states thefollowing-

"Conditions considered for IU: bilateral knee conditions andvaricose veins…After review of the Veteran's pertinent records (C-file and STR)as well as most current medical examinations, diagnostics, and consults; withreview and examination of the Veteran and in light of most pertinent andcredible medical information and sources; IT IS AS LEAST AS LIKELY AS NOT THATthe Veteran meets the criteria to be considered solely and medically unable toseek and maintain gainful employment."

So, now my remanded appeal for secondary goes back to BVA with this IU claim. The secondary has two IMOs vetted by one of the best law firms in Washington and has been to CAVC once and remanded (prior to the IMOs). I have been told it will get large priority because it has kept the CAVC Docket Number. But it is still all so disheartening because the evidence for both in my favor is so dramatic. I go to the VAMC tomorrow. In addition to my other health issues I have now developed a heart condition. They want to put the paddles on me to shock it back into rhythm. In August i developed a pinched nerve in my neck that sent me to the emergency room and an MRI shows degeneration between C5 and C6.

Edited by Pete53
Redact personal information
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

deanbrt -

You need to redact your SSAN and other personal info from your posts! I'd like to believe we're all great people here, but some unscrupulous passer-by could really do some damage to you with your full name, address, social, etc...

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

A depression claim is a good idea. If you are in severe pain and disabled that would make anyone depressed and it is all secondary to the SC bad knees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My claim for secondary has TWO IMOs for depression and anxiety by board certified psychiatrists in their field that were reviewed by a well known Washington DC VA law firm for completeness to VA criteria and a third by the executive director of the mental health agency for the county I live in. I have come to feel that some of the statements made on Hadit about the ROs and getting to BVA as soon as you can have a lot of truth to them....

It just seems like the ROs role is to deny, almost without exception, and irregardless of the evidence, if the claim is significant.

I am pretty sick about the C&P opinion for extra scheduler, given the C&P exam results from April. Everyone I have talked to has said "as least likely as not" should have met their criteria and the vet gets the benefit of the doubt...

I have to go to my VAMC tomorrow for my heart and I guess I will tell them to go ahead with the paddles.

and

A depression claim is a good idea. If you are in severe pain and disabled that would make anyone depressed and it is all secondary to the SC bad knees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use