Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Tdiu

Rate this question


UsmcSGTVet

Question

This is my first time posting on this sight so if I'm doing it wrong just let me know.

I am in need of a little insight and guidence. My claim for TDIU was submitted in on October 6, 2010 to the Pittsburgh RO. (16-1/2 months and counting) As of September 23, 2011 it has been with the rating activity. At my Comp exam for TDIU the doctor stated that my PTSD, Shoulder dislocations, and Buldging disks are "At least as likely as not render him unable to secure and maintain gainful employment." Has anyone had similar wording or anything they can tell me about the outcome of such wording? Also is almost 17 months normal for TDIU claims in Pittsburgh?

PTSD- 50%

Right shoulder dislocations- 20%

L4-L5, L5-S1 - Buldging disks- 10%

Neurologic involvement lefter lower extremity- 10%

Hiatel hernia- 10%

70% Total

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Wording like that is usually sucessful in getting TDIU claims approved. What is your rating as we speak? An 18 month time frame is not unusual for claims of any sort at any VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My current ratings.

PTSD- 50%

Right shoulder dislocations- 20%

L4-L5, L5-S1 - Buldging disks- 10%

Neurologic involvement lefter lower extremity- 10%

Hiatel hernia- 10%

70% combined

What date will they go back too? The date the claim was submitted or the date I became eligible due to meeting the requirements?

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

when your C&P examiner state that your service connected disabilities is at least as likely as not,that is 50% of more,that your service connected disabilities make you ungainful employable,and when the evidence is balance,it is like running to first base in baseball,if you get there the same time the ball do you are safe and i beleive you are safe. let use no the outcome.

mobie16r

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They will most likely use the date of the TDIU form for the Retro EED.

Do you receive SSDI? Is it solely for the SC conditions?

If so- Does VA know you get SSDI and have you signed authorization form for them to obtain those records?

Often a SSA disability award,if solely for SC cnditions, that predates a TDIU claim ,can generate up to one year more retro if they use the SSA award date (the onset date) to determine the EED.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't recieve SSDI.

May 2009 decision 60% combined.

NOD sent

November 2010 NOD for May 2009 decision awarded 70% with effective date of May 2009.

October 2010 TDIU application

I just want to make sure that May 2009 is or isn't my retro date. I became eligible for TDIU in May 2009 but due to the mistakes made by the RO I wasn't awarded till November 2010. Since my effective date was May 2009 does the retro date start there or will it just start at the application date of October 2010? Is there a PUB or docket number that goes into detail about the procedures they follow in determining such date? I just want as much information as possible in case I need to fight for an EED. I've been in the VA system since July 2003 so I do know how most things work but I'm in new territory now and need a good compass to navigate this the proper way.

Thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In many cases they use the date of the TDIU application for the retro-

unless they have medical evidence that would warrant an earlier effective date.

This is why I asked if you get SSDI as that would reveal medical evidence that could warrant an EED more favorable than the date of te TDIU application.

It is difficult to know what you could expect here-in my opinion as that depends on the medical evidence you have.

With retro from a successful TDIU award, you could always obtain an IMO to support a more favorable retro then the date of the TDIU claim,if the IMO doc provides a good rationale and references to your medical evidence.

Many vets had succeeded in getting better EEDs for TDIU and then many have not.

This BVA link to their decisions can be used to study other similiar claims:

http://www.index.va.gov/search/va/bva.html

I always search the most recent decisions first by year.

I found some awarded and some denied regarding more favorable EEDS-

Just put TDIU Earliest Effective Date into the search browser and you will see how the VA rationale kicks in.

These were denied claims at the regional level that went to the BVA.

Also if you google M21-1MR Earliest Effective Dates

that too should bring up more info.

Also there has been signiicanrt discussion here at hadit on this subject.

If you google' hadit.com: earliest effective dates', much should pop up.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use