Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Smc S And Question About Dmii

Rate this question


FrankieG23

Question

A friend of mine was rated at 30% (20% for DMII and Hypertension 10% he has tingling in foot but I dont know if that was rated). He received an implanted defrib/pacemaker. He was increased to 100%. I told him the implanted device, the defrib, was 100% by itself, and he should try for another 60%, so he can get SMC S. He talked to someone at VA and they told him 100% is as high as it gets, he had no idea about SMC's. He is on insulin for DMII, so that should be increased to 40%. He has tingling in his hands as well. Can anyone make suggestions. I hate for him to ask for increase in DMII, and they take that away. Has anyone heard of anyone being consider DM1, once they get on insulin. It's just that the meds don't control it after awhile. I also thought DM1 was juvenile diabetes, but a nurse at VA hospital said it is really DM1 once you start on insulin. And if that's true, does the VA try to take away the DMII status?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Thanks Boomer, sorry about your friend. Dabetes is nasty disease which effects many things in the body. I have had my doctor tell me that after so many years on medication, almost everyone eventually ends up on insulin. Thanks for posting regs. I thought getting on insulin increased the percentage to 40. I wanted him to get his 60% so he can get SMC S but I didn't want him to risk anything he has now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
Hey Phillip, They Now have a surgery for PN in Diabetic Called Decompression Surgery usually done in the Podiatry side of the VAMC 85% of diabetics who get it have less to no Amputations, anyone having problems should check into it. I don't have diabetes but have sever case of PN so done at VAMC Salem VA. By a DR. Bonk who I.m told has Vets Come from all parts of the country to him for the surgery Rich.

Thanks, Rich!! I'll have to wait on any surgery, until it gets worse, as I only have surgery for absolute lifethreatening injuries/illnesses, these days, as all surgeries have risks. Thanks again, tho!

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
Thanks Boomer, sorry about your friend. Dabetes is nasty disease which effects many things in the body. I have had my doctor tell me that after so many years on medication, almost everyone eventually ends up on insulin. Thanks for posting regs. I thought getting on insulin increased the percentage to 40. I wanted him to get his 60% so he can get SMC S but I didn't want him to risk anything he has now.

I don't think he's running any risk, altho most VA employees and VSO's will say he is. It's just their way of helping the VA out. jmo

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he has DMII from the AO ,I don't think he needs to worry about that rating at all.

DMII has considerable other secondary disabilities that are possible for SC.

The VA DMII Training letter is here under a search and it contains many of those secondary problems.

They all need a doctor,if claimed as secondary , to make the medical link to the DMII.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If you have DMII and you can get the VA to do a CT scan of your legs it will probably show some hardening of the arteries. You can file for this as aterioscelorotic (spelling ??) heart disease secondary to DMII. I got it that way. You may not get 100% for this but I got 60%. I had the VA do a CT scan of a lump on my leg and they discovered the hardening of the arteries. DMII is secondary to so many other problems it is good to keep up on it. The VA may identify the condition but they won't make the DMII connection.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use