Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

New Evidence After Appeal Started

Rate this question


Raybob

Question

I filed an appeal on 3/1/13 for the denial of a compensable claim which had been repeatedly refused numerous times since 2010. I have asked for a personal hearing in DC.

Although the Appeal is dated by the VA as 6/12/13, the eBenefits shows the claim as "Appeal Pending" and "You have initiated an appeal, but at this point your case is still with the local VA office that made the decision on your case. If you have questions about your appeal, please contact that office or your representative, if you have one."

Following telephone confirmation today, next week I will receive new medical evidence that supports my claim -- which adds additional objective detail to evidence already in VA possession (as listed in their SOC).

1. Should I just hold on to this new evidence until I have my face-to-face appeal hearing in DC?

2. Or should I send it into the VARO.

i don't think I want to do anything that will delay my personal hearing longer or start the clock over, but then again, perhaps this could resolve the issue and result in an approval of the claim without the need to wait xxx days for the personal hearing.

Any advice is, as always, appreciated.

Cheers,

Ray

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Never hold it. Send it anyway.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your recommendations, J and Broncovet... I will send in as soon as I get it in the mail.

The initial claim was part of my BDD retirement claim (Dec 2009), so am expecting it to be retro back to my June 2010 retirement date.

It involved a CT scan that was taken in Aug 2010 documenting the residuals of 2 surgeries I had at Walter Reed while on AD.

I just had that same CT scan re-evaluated to get a second, more detailed write up by the Walter Reed Radiology Dept -- all the info and evidence was already in my records sent to VA, but now I have more specific language that "should" leave no reoom for denial of the claim (although, really, there should never have been doubt from the beginning with the medical evidence I submitted -- it is for skull loss, which is hardly a subjective claim).

Cheers

Ray

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would sure submit it and send it marked as Attention to (on the envelope and on the enclosed 21- 4138 or cover letter, and then put the initials that appear in the numeric and initialized code on the VA letter that appears on the right hand side after the RE:

This was the last person (by initial) who worked on your claim at the VARO.

(and send with a Proof of mailing)

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you, Berta!

And I found out something even more shocking today, but am getting the usual VA run around!

Since I was able to go back to Walter Reed and have them issue an Addendum to the original Radiologist's findings on their CT scan, while at the VAMC today, I decided to ask for a copy of the original VA C&P x-ray that had been cited in the SOC and used for all the denials for the past three years.

I had done this once before and was told I could only have the report, so I wanted it noted I asked and they could not supply the x-ray which I would use at my appeal hearing. Well, this time I was told I had to go to Radiology to get a copy! So I did.

I got home, put the CD in my computer opened the x-ray taken of my skull (that was cited as a "normal" skull x-ray) and was shocked! Right there in front of this "layman's" eyes was my skull x-ray showing two separate back circles on the right profile shot of the skull. FYI, I only have one ear!

I called VAMC Radiology to ask if it can be reviewed again, and was told I could not ask and that the Radiologists dont talk to patients. I was told to call my regular VA doctor, but I said he had nothing to do with the C&P x-ray. They then said to call the C&P office. I did, and they said, sorry, we have to be told by the VARO to do something. I let them know that I had two separate C&P exams for this issue in their office and that both had supported my claim, but that the VARO was using the x-ray report to dent it. Well, they then told me to call the VARO, which I expect to also be a dead-end call (hant made that call yet).

Has anyone ever had any success getting VA take a second look at an x-ray? Any advice on how to do that would be appreciated.

Cheers,

Ray

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

Generally, the rating specialist is not qualified to interpret X rays. This requires the expertise of a radiologist, whose job it is to interpret Xrays. You might check to see what the radiologist wrote down, and see if you agree with his interpretation. If you do not like the radiologist interpretation, then you can rebut it only with another qualified medical specialist, such as an IMO/IME. If the VA rater did interpret your x rays, that is Cue, as rating specialists are unqualified to make medical diagnosis. Time after time the CAVC puts down raters who attempt medical diagnosis. Even judges are not qualified to make medical determinations and rely on qualified medical personel who are.

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use