I was wondering if a NOD claim goes back to the same rater who denied the initial claim or does it go to a completely different Rater unknown to the initial Rater? How does this actually work within the system when you file a NOD? Do you file it with all the new evidence right then attached or is it best to wait on sending New Evidence until after Statement of Claim (SOC) is received to counter it better? What is the SOC all about and any different than the decision denial reasons????? Working on it this weekend to file with Rep on Monday so would appreciate a quick reply. Thanks for any help out there.
Question
Wayne TX
I was wondering if a NOD claim goes back to the same rater who denied the initial claim or does it go to a completely different Rater unknown to the initial Rater? How does this actually work within the system when you file a NOD? Do you file it with all the new evidence right then attached or is it best to wait on sending New Evidence until after Statement of Claim (SOC) is received to counter it better? What is the SOC all about and any different than the decision denial reasons????? Working on it this weekend to file with Rep on Monday so would appreciate a quick reply. Thanks for any help out there.
Edited by Wayne TXLink to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
3
2
2
2
Popular Days
Apr 7
4
Apr 14
4
Apr 8
2
Apr 9
2
Top Posters For This Question
jfrei 3 posts
Gastone 2 posts
Buck52 2 posts
4mydad 2 posts
Popular Days
Apr 7 2016
4 posts
Apr 14 2016
4 posts
Apr 8 2016
2 posts
Apr 9 2016
2 posts
Popular Posts
Buck52
Gastone has good information on the NOD Process & Here'is some more information This is from a VARO DRO From Milwaukee Wi stating how the VA Appeal process works, ''Submissio
Gastone
With the NOD filing, your options are Traditional Appeal to the BVA or DRO "DE NOVO" Review or actual DRO Hearing. The original Rater's job and involvement in your claim is done, unless you try the VA
broncovet
It goes to someone different, Wayne. This is done to help to prevent fraud. The idea is if one rater fraudulently approved someone, and it went back to a differnent guy when he sought an increase, t
12 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now