Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

MH C&P examiner ignored evidence.

Rate this question


Andyman73

Question

Hello all, I am starting a new thread about my issue, I was dangerously close to hijacking somebody else's thread. 

Background,

C&P exam, Nov 2nd, 2015 for depression secondary to chronic pain. DX as MDD reoccurant, with SI, in June of 2015, by VA MH dr. I asked him if depression can be caused by chronic pain, he said most definitely. Many depressed Vets have chronic pain issues. So then I filed the claim for depression secondary to chronic pain.

I fell down stairs during boot camp in 11/92. Many issues with back and knee pain from that point. VA SCd me for painful knee condition, bilateral. And Low back strain/pain, residual pain from L ankle injury, tinittus and hearing loss, all dated to my EAS of 11/98. So, now I have chronic established.

C&P examiner ignored all my evidence, and opined that one minor leg injury, in his opinion, can't lead to depression. I don't know how he, in is uninformed mind, can say that the other VA docs and ROs thought my one minor leg injury led to those contentions being SCd 17 years ago.

RO told me on the phone that she will not over rule the examiner, since he must know what he's talking about....so she willfully ignored my evidence as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Have you officially been denied?  If so I would request another C&P exam and also file a NOD.  Before I say "usually" the C&P examiner should have reviewed your file prior to the examination, which if that was the case does not mean he ignored the evidence, but disagrees with it. In the final decision there is a section which shows all the evidence used in deciding your claim if there is evidence you submitted and it was not included in making the decision you definitely should address this in your NOD. If your trying to link depression to a physical condition it is best to get a nexus letter linking the two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
2 hours ago, smoothc100 said:

Have you officially been denied?  If so I would request another C&P exam and also file a NOD.  Before I say "usually" the C&P examiner should have reviewed your file prior to the examination, which if that was the case does not mean he ignored the evidence, but disagrees with it. In the final decision there is a section which shows all the evidence used in deciding your claim if there is evidence you submitted and it was not included in making the decision you definitely should address this in your NOD. If your trying to link depression to a physical condition it is best to get a nexus letter linking the two.

Yes, got denied, filed NOD. Spoke to my VA MH dr, he was surprised that the examiner went against me. And then wrote how he couldn't see a minor leg injury causing depression.

Ok, so maybe not, but bilateral patella femoral knee pain condition, low back strain/pain, painful ROM of each knee separate, L ankle residual pain from injury, pes cavus, bilateral w/plantar fasciitis bilateral as well.

Knees, back and ankle are SCD to my EAS date of 11/98. The feet are from last July.  He don't have to say anything, it's already established by the VA granting my awards, right?

He only wrote that he disagreed with a minor leg injury that only needed 8 days in a leg brace.  Worse yet, the RO refused to look at my mountain of evidence, said she will not overrule the MH examiner.  So she ignored it all as well.  That kind of defeats the purpose of the C&P exam, since it was based on chronic pain to begin with.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Andyman73,

Sorry to hear you were denied, but you still can win. I think the examiner didn't review your evidence especially if there is some missing from the Decision Letter (listed documents used), which I would mention in the NOD.  Were you treated for depression in the service? You might need to obtain a nexus letter as well to show the link, because physical disabilities can cause depression. Did you have a DBQ done?  If not it might be good to obtain one from an outside provider as the VA doc rarely do them. If you suffered from depression in the service and its documented in your military medical records then it might be better just to file for the depression as a primary condition instead of a secondary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

smoothc100,

Examiner told me he looked at my SMR and VMRs before the exam. If that was so, he would have seen all the entries for pain related issues.  But since he dismissed them so easily, I think he did NOT review my records.

No service treatment, most Marines don't go for this due to the social stigma attached.  No DBQ by examiner, or my VA MH who DXd me with MDD 4 months before C&P exam.

I attempted suicide several times by alcohol, and once was stopped from slicing my wrists, while at my work station.  All that came from that was a visit to my division chief, and then the base chaplin. But no entry in my service record, no referral to hospital for MH eval either.  Just covered it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Andyman73, have you considered obtaining an IMO to counter that idiot examiner? I know they can be expensive, but I do know of one IMO provider that WILL accept pretty much whatever monthly payment you can afford. If your not considering getting an IMO, you definitely want to request a new c&p exam. I remember that your examiner was an MH Doc, but you can still request a new exam. It seems from what you stated about the examiners attitude that he was already determined to deny you before you even had the exam, and I would put that into the new exam request. I'm sorry that I cant remember, but have you asked any of your MH Docs to complete a DBQ for you as well? They might say no, but then again, they might say yes and save you the cost of obtaining a new IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

flores97.

I have thought long and hard about seeing a private MH provider for an IMO/IME, but my marriage and life would not survive the potential fallout if that were to become a part of my personal non-VA health record. 

I can ask my VA MH dr when I see him again in a few weeks. 

The examiner was the pill prescribing type of MH dr.

Or maybe just let the whole thing go, can't keep knocking on doors that go nowhere.  The only thing happening is my MDD is not getting any better with any of this.  After so many rejections, I find little or no reason at all to keep asking...just settle for what ever I have.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use