Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

The package sat in the mailbox at Janesville...

Rate this question


CapnHaddock

Question

I need a sanity check...  I filed my first VA claim after being out of the service for over 20 years and was awarded 80% from the day I filed.  I then followed up with another claim that moved me to 90%.  In the mean time I appealed the denials from the first claim.  I am now 100% P&T (I am 63).  I have my good days and bad days but I am not going to complain.  This is my issue - I submitted an intent to file on the second claim and submitted it by overnight mail and can prove that it arrived and was ready for pickup on the morning of May 29th of last year.  That is the day my Intent to File expired.  My package sat in the box until it was picked up on the 30th and was then recorded as arriving on the 30th and the intent to file null and void.  I can prove this from the U.S. Post Office documentation.  I should not have waited to the last minute however that is another story.  I want to submit an appeal for the date of receipt.  Am I opening myself up for another set of evaluations and is this type of appeal even considered.  I have poured through the instructions and can nothing about date of receipt.  Does anyone have any experience on this?     

Old, but I'm not that old
Young, but I'm not that bold

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

CapnHaddock I'm a little confused on the sequence of events. You appealed and got approval to 100% P&T on the first claim right? Before it was approved you submitted an ITF on the second claim? If the claim was less than a year, you don't submit ITF but submit the claim. ITF is on new action, not appeals still open. Not sure what's going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

if the date of appeal receipt the date they got the INT Thats the date the VA goes by  when they first get it...if it arrived at the post office the 1 day before the expiration date and the VA picked it up the following day  ...you were 1 day short of the expiration date, you might can fight the expiration date just being one day late  but they will fight you tooth and nail for this INT Retro

This is why ALL veterans need to make sure they have enough time  1 day is to late  so I'd say at lest a week before the expiration date expires

Note*

They do have provisions to use for late exasperation dates...I don't know these provisions?or the guidelines /criteria

just one day expired  and it was at the P.O; you should be able to recover your years INT Back pay.

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

GB - I went to 80% on my first claim.  Submitted a second claim that took me to 90%.  I then appealed the first claim.  The intent to file was on the claim that took me to 90%.  When they came back and agreed to my appeal - the VA gave me back pay to the date of the 90% claim award for 100%.  Essentially I did not get the year of backpay going from 90 to 100% based on the date the VA shows for submission of the second claim - by the one day it sat in the mailbox in Janesville.  The question is - am I opening Pandora's box by submitting this appeal or because I am P&T I will not get pushed into more exams.  It is a year of backpay that I am looking at.

I am also wondering if I should submit for worsening problems on awards already received?  (example - Right hip impingement is substantially worse according the doctor).

Old, but I'm not that old
Young, but I'm not that bold

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

CapnHaddock I agree with Buck; you have to find the EED requirement. Try looking in M-21 manual first. But make no mistake, you will be in for a fight on this one. Going from 70%, or 80% to 100% will be a few back-pay bucks.  It  is what a friend used to say, "is the juice worth the squeeze?" In other words, risk v. reward. If you're P&T, they are supposed to leave it be. If you challenge, they have to look hard at your claim. Shouldn't matter but... So, again, why pursue an increase for your existing claims?  Will your symptoms now result in such an increase that you will be eligible for SMC's? Otherwise, why are you considering submitting a claim for worsening conditions? You don't want to do that IMHO if there is nothing to gain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

GB and Buck - Thank you - that one comment "is the juice worth the squeeze" is what was bothering me all along.  It is not.  I am fairly well beat up however I do not think it is worth the effort and COVID exposure to go back through exams again if they force the issue.  I needed a sounding board and this helped.  I am going to let sleeping dogs lie.  As for secondary submissions on already granted disabilities - I will just keep them in ready reserve if ever needed or until I cannot physically work anymore.

My experience with the VA (other than my own problem with the ITF and date) has been very positive to date.

Old, but I'm not that old
Young, but I'm not that bold

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

CapnHaddock

You should at least try to get the ITF Back pay , the reason for the ITF To expire is a good reason (waiting at the claims center post office )so it actually was there  they just didn't get it and read it  before the date expired and only one day   they more than likely will  approve your ITF Back pay. ...>go for it.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use