Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Percentage of Service Connection Based on Current status or Severity

Rate this question


blahsaysme2u

Question

I just had a very interesting conversation with my VSO and wanted to check out the truth of the matter. I have never heard this argument nor does it make sense to me. 

I am trying to get an increase for my migraine headaches. I was having headaches 3-4x a week! with at least 1 prostrating(i would not be able to do anything, would have to go lay down and be away from noise or light or distraction due to the pain etc). I filed for migraine claim and they denied at first then gave me 0%. Now i am trying for increase. Now my VSO says i will never get the increase because i am on medication.

I have been seeing a neuro doc at the va that gave me meds that have been a miracle. I have not had a migraine in a few months now. It has been amazing. 

so my question: i don't see how getting treatment for something changes how my va rating should be. if i lost a limb and they gave me a prosthetic, they wouldn't take away Service Rating or decrease that? How about sleep apnea; I dont get less service connection because i use a CPAP, i get more?!?!? shouldn't the fact that i require medication for the rest of my life to manage migraines show a worse condition? My VSO said its the same with blood pressure, that if you take meds and its managed then you lose your SC. is any of this true? 

I gave a hypothetical: what if they discover a magic pill that cures all us vets from PTSD but we have to take these pills for the rest of our lives. that means we would all loose our service connection for PTSD if we start taking them? what if we missed a dose? what if they get lost in the mail? (which has happened with my meds plenty)

i just can't wrap my head around this flawed logic of a treated disability is no longer a disability. 

Thanks guys

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

so an update. 

now my VSO is saying that if i want to submit, i need to get a letter from my doctor because they have already reviewed my medical records and decided 0% on migraines. so i need new and relevant evidence. i dont understand this since the doctor i see is a VA doctor, all my records with him should have been reviewed and he noted how many headaches i was having and how they affected me and the medication i am being treated with. why do i need to do anything else. i dont think they actually saw my records but bc it was in my decision letter, my VSO is adament that they have already reviewed my records and there is "nothing more i can do without new evidence" 

anyone else think this is wrong. cant i do HLR or even BVA without new evidence?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Blahsaysme2U If you are rated at o%, then you are service connected. Check. All you now have to do is match up with the symptoms for rating purposes. I would suggest you post the decision letter and we can see the reason for your low ball. If you provided records (or your doc did) showing frequency, duration, etc. then that would be the evidence going into the C&P exam. If your condition has improved, and you don't have prostrating anymore, that is a key. Once a month is equal to 30%, once every 2 months is 10%. Not having them anymore due to the meds, means 0%. That is the same reason that they have regular re-eval done on veterans; if the disability gets worse, you get an increase, if it gets better, you can possibly get a decrease. Now, that said, you could appeal and if you could get a EED, you could in theory get back pay for the time prior to the meds started to work. Not sure, but I would expect you couldn't get it at HLR, so it would be BVA. Not great news for you regarding compensation, but at least you are feeling better with the meds. One suggestion I have is to research the new med and see if there are any adverse affects from using it. ex. causes stomach or gerd issues. Or high b/p, etc. Or, you could do this; accept the 0%. Stop taking the meds. After documenting it with your doc and keeping a log, submit an appeal on increase disability symptoms. I'm not sure I would do that myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder
11 hours ago, blahsaysme2u said:

so an update. 

now my VSO is saying that if i want to submit, i need to get a letter from my doctor because they have already reviewed my medical records and decided 0% on migraines. so i need new and relevant evidence. i dont understand this since the doctor i see is a VA doctor, all my records with him should have been reviewed and he noted how many headaches i was having and how they affected me and the medication i am being treated with. why do i need to do anything else. i dont think they actually saw my records but bc it was in my decision letter, my VSO is adament that they have already reviewed my records and there is "nothing more i can do without new evidence" 

anyone else think this is wrong. cant i do HLR or even BVA without new evidence?

Once you’ve established a service connection for your current disability, the VA Regional Office will compare the symptoms and impact of that condition (using  your medical records and examinations) to the criteria listed in the VA  Schedule of Disability Ratings.

By law, when determining the percentage for your rating the VA can only consider the criteria contained in the Diagnostic Code for the given disability – – to do otherwise is error.

Unless the effects of medications are specifically included in the impairment rating criteria for your condition, the VA is NOT allowed to consider whether a particular medication moderates a Veteran’s condition in determining the degree of disability.

Source: VLB (Attorney Chris Attig)

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
21 hours ago, GBArmy said:

Blahsaysme2U If you are rated at o%, then you are service connected. Check. All you now have to do is match up with the symptoms for rating purposes. I would suggest you post the decision letter and we can see the reason for your low ball. If you provided records (or your doc did) showing frequency, duration, etc. then that would be the evidence going into the C&P exam. If your condition has improved, and you don't have prostrating anymore, that is a key. Once a month is equal to 30%, once every 2 months is 10%. Not having them anymore due to the meds, means 0%. That is the same reason that they have regular re-eval done on veterans; if the disability gets worse, you get an increase, if it gets better, you can possibly get a decrease. Now, that said, you could appeal and if you could get a EED, you could in theory get back pay for the time prior to the meds started to work. Not sure, but I would expect you couldn't get it at HLR, so it would be BVA. Not great news for you regarding compensation, but at least you are feeling better with the meds. One suggestion I have is to research the new med and see if there are any adverse affects from using it. ex. causes stomach or gerd issues. Or high b/p, etc. Or, you could do this; accept the 0%. Stop taking the meds. After documenting it with your doc and keeping a log, submit an appeal on increase disability symptoms. I'm not sure I would do that myself.

Glad you responded. this was great advice and good break down. i am guessing that my records are showing i am doing better but they should show i am still having at least 1-2 a month that are severe. i dont have any of the smaller "less severe" headaches at all with meds but still get at least one bad one a month if not 2. 

thanks for the advice on the EED. i think i will try and fight this and next time i talk to my doctor see if he will write up something saying how the meds have helped but not "cured" me of migraines. and then put in for an appeal. i am going to start my head ache log again and try and back date at least 6 months showing how it has improved but not to a 0% ammount.

i would not stop taking these meds for nothing. i would be miserable without them. i am glad it has helped just sad it makes my disability less "severe" in the eyes of the VA. seems to me if i have something so bad i have to have meds for the rest of my life that should be taken into account as being more severe. i know there are some disabilities that are rated that way. crzy this and HBP or diabetes is not. i take meds for my GERD and they dont make that less rating. 

thanks again for your help!

12 hours ago, Buck52 said:

Once you’ve established a service connection for your current disability, the VA Regional Office will compare the symptoms and impact of that condition (using  your medical records and examinations) to the criteria listed in the VA  Schedule of Disability Ratings.

By law, when determining the percentage for your rating the VA can only consider the criteria contained in the Diagnostic Code for the given disability – – to do otherwise is error.

Unless the effects of medications are specifically included in the impairment rating criteria for your condition, the VA is NOT allowed to consider whether a particular medication moderates a Veteran’s condition in determining the degree of disability.

Source: VLB (Attorney Chris Attig)

thats great info. wonder where it says that in code/law though?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use