Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

55 Year Old Rule?

Rate this question


harry59

Question

I've seen on a couple of websites where it stated that your VA rating percentage is protected and they cannot reduce your rating once you reach 55 years old.  Is this true?  If so, where can I find this in the VA regulations for verification?  

Thank you to all who reply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Hi Harry59

You can find that in the VA  m21-1 manual here https://www.knowva.ebenefits.va.gov/system/templates/selfservice/va_ssnew/help/customer/locale/en-US/portal/554400000001018/content/554400000015810/M21-1,-Part-III,-Subpart-iv,-Chapter-3,-Section-B---Scheduling-Examinations#2d. It is also based on 38cfr if you want the legal basis. If you are scheduled for a follow up exam, it should be noted as a comment on your decision letter as well as your Rating Code Sheet if it says you are "static." Static means no expectation of improvement, so a re-exam is not necessary. If you reach 55, then you also shouldn't be called either. HOWEVER, if you submit a NEW disability claim, then all bets are off and they can re-look at anything whey want in evaluating your new claim, so keep that in mind also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thank you for the reply, and the reference. I have been at 70% for 18 years and I'm currently 61 years old. If I understand it correctly, the VA 20-year rule states that they cannot downgrade your percentage. I want to be evaluated for an increase and some secondary issues as well, and possibly a new claim, but I'm afraid I will be downgraded. You never know with the VA. I am currently receiving concurrent receipt so if I get decreased below 50% I will lose it. That financial blow would be devastating.  Any advice?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

The VA don't play this game by their rules  they can make any Veterans life miserable if they want to/or choose to.,

All it takes is a VA Dr writing something like this '' This veterans disability has shown improvement and he is doing a lot better,  ,,and this goes into his medical records, R.O. Checks these medical records like hungry vouchers and Walla sends out the propose reduction letter because they were informed from a VA Physician that your S.C. disability has shown Improvement...

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Hello Buck, 

Does the VA RO only check a veteran’s records if a new claim is opened?

Somewhere along the way, on my almost 20 years of dealing with the VA, I picked that belief up. I can’t remember if it was from my DAV VSO or from a retired VA rater that I know.  
 

texasvet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Well its hard to tell what they heck they do up at the R.O.

USUALLY when a veteran files for another claim  they only check the records for that particular claim, but it depends on the Veterans rating at the time they adjuicate a New Claim

example 

 IN 2002 I was 90% TDIU P&T FOR MY PROFOUND HEARING LOSS THAT WAS CAUSED BY LOUD SUDDEN NOISE WHILE IN THE MILITARY  OK IT TOOK YEARS FOR MY HEARING TO GET SO BAD I COULD NOT HEAR WELL ENOUGH TO DO MY JOB  EVEN WITH USE OF HEARING AIDS..SO I FILED FOR HEARING LOSS  AND WAS GIVEN A 50% RATING  OK MY HEARING LOSS CONTINIUE TO GET WORSE I WENT TO VA REHAB  AND THEY COULD NOT FIND ME ANYTHING I COULD DO MAKING ME NOT FEAISABLE TO RETRAIN AT THIS TIME, I SUBMMITED THAT LETTER WHEN I FILED FOR THE INCREASE THEY RATED ME 90% FOR MY HEARING LOSS AND INCLUDED TINNITUS FOR 10%

 SO I WAS ON TDIU P&T FOR ABOUT 14YEARS ,LATER ON I FILED FOR ANOTHER CLAIM IN 2015  AND WAS SERVICE CONNECTED FOR 70%  THIS IS WHEN THEY MAY LOOK INTO YOUR RECORD FILES  THEY DO THIS TO SEE IF YOU MEET THE CRITERIA FOR THE SMC S.

AND IF A VETERAN HAS A 100% RATING  OR TDIU AND FILES ABOTHER CLAIM AND IS RATED 60% OR HIGHER FOR THIS NEW CONDITION(DISABILITY)THIS MEETS THE CRITERIA FOR THE SMC-S AND ITS A STATUTORY RATING  BUT SOMETIMES THEY DON'T ALWAYS CHECK THIS..I  HAD NO IDEAL I GET HE SMC S..I WAS SUPRISED I GOT THAT WHEN I GOT MY PACKET IN THE MAIL.>>>  BUT HEY I;LL TAKE IT  . ABOUT 347.00 MONTH ADDED IN TO THE 100% RATE

THIS WAS NOT EASY WHEN  I FIRST FILLED FOR HEARING LOSS I WAS DENIED  THEN I APPEAL AND THEY GAVE ME service connection at 0%  I APPEAL THAT AND THEN I GOT THE 50%  IF THEY HAD DID THEIR JOB RIGHT IN THE FIRST PLACE AND GAVE ME TO DAMN 50%  IWOULD NOT HAVE HAD TO APPEAL  IT TOOK FROM 1998 TO 2002 TO GET MY 90% TDIU P&T

IF A VETERAN HAS ANYTHING THAT ARISES LATER ON AFTER HE IS SERVICE CONNECTED FOR A CONDITION AND THIS NEW CONDITION ARISES LATER ON SAY 1 YEAR OR 10 YEARS LATER,  IT IS CONSIDER ANOTHER SEPERATE CONDITION MAKING  IT A SEPERATE CONDITION  CLAIM  NOT  A REOPEN CLAIM ON YOUR OLD CONDITION  BUT ON  A NEW CONDITION  AND IF YOU WERE RATED 100% OR TDIU ON YOUR OLD CONDTION  AND 60% OR HIGHER FOR ANOTHER SEPERATE CONDITION THEN THEY ARE SUPPOSE TO CHECK YOUR RECORDS   TO SEE IF YOU QUAILFY FOR THE SMC S.

ITS A STAUTORY RATING. BUT LIKE I MENTION THAY DON'T ALWWAYS DO THIS  SO THE VETERAN CAN BRING IT TO THIR ATTENTION AND ASK WHY THE SMC S WAS NOT APPLIED AT THIS TIME.?

YOU CAN CALL THE 1-800 # AND ASK WHY OR HAVE THEM TO APPLY THE SMC S.BUT YOU MAY HAVE TO APPLY FOR IT DEPENDS IF THEY SCREWED UP AT THE R.O. OR NOT.?

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

i ALWAYS TELL A VETERAN IF HE IS SERVICE CONNECTED FOR SOMETHING  AND HAD IT FOR A FEW YEARS  AND HE COMES DOWN WITH ANOTHER CONDITION THAT  IS SEPERATE FROM THE ONE HE HAS SERVICE CONNECTED

THEN FILE THAT CLAIM ,WE NEED TO GET EVERY BENEFIT WERE ENTITLED TO  LIFES TO SHORT NOT TO. 

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use