Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Defense Bill will add 3 new AO presumptives

Rate this question


Berta

Question

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

John, I do not believe the USS Hancock is on the VA AO ship's list- however, you have been incountry Vietnam, and I assume that  was a COD plane that took you there from the ship:

https://www.va.gov/vetapp20/files6/20040078.txt

Your ship is also at Facebook.

This vet above proved that he was sent to Vietnam with supplies from the USS Hancock.

BVA awarded his DMII claim but remanded the claim for other issues.

A widow vet advocate I know proved her husband was on the USS Bon Hommee-I am spelling that wrong, and I think this ship is now on the AO list, but she had to prove he was sent to Vietnam on the ships COD planes and proved his disability was from AO and it caused his death..she was an aggressive advocate for Blue Water Navy as well and helped get HR 299 passed.

Can you scan and attach the denials here? We need to see the evidence list they used as well as their rationale for denial.

Cover your C file #, name prior to scanning it.

You said: The logs were destroyed- do you mean they are not in your Military Personnel file?

They might be on line at this web site:

https://www.usshancockassociation.org/index.php

But you do not need them if you prove Boots on Ground-Vietnam.

The site above has a reunion roster I believe and that is a good way to find a buddy.

TWS ( TogetherWe Serve) might help as well.

 

-------------------------------------

Jarhead11- Al green was a popular singer for many years and in late 1989 I bought every "album" of his that I could afford.

My Army husband was hospitalized due to a brain tumor , and music gave me some relief from the stress of wondering if he would ever come home. He never did.
 
My daughter,on her first leave in USAF, came home at Christmas in 1998 ,with a great CD player for me ( I still used a 'record player,' in those days,) and she gave me his entire Anthology on CDs and we played every CD while she was here ( she grew up with mommy's music and what a gift that was- I make my own CDs now and have some of his music on them for my car.)
 
 
He was one of the first black singers who attracted large white female audiences-( it is so  odd to write that, as music really has united our country in so many ways)- 
He started out with love songs, and then added Gospel to many albums and wrote most of his songs himself , but is now the pastor of the Tabernacle Baptist Church in Macon Georgia.
 
I brought my portable CD player and played part of one of his songs, at a senior luncheon at my church, when they asked to hear my testimony again.
 
Almost every senior there  recognized the song I played. And they remembered how popular he was. 
 
Thanks for asking. I have found music can relieve a lot of stress and takes us to a different place when we feel overwhelmed. And nothing can add  a lot more stress to any veteran or their survivors,  than dealing with the VA.
 
 
 
 
 

 

https://www.facebook.com/groups/128667737214096/

More for John: but I think you can prove Boots on Ground, so you would not need the logs-

" Unfortunately the flight logs have been destroyed and deck logs don’t specify exact aircraft or passengers that launched or where they are headed. '

Where did you get that info- as t the deck logs being destroyed - there are Many sites online that have deck logs and they should also be in your Military Personnel file ( NAV201) .

I was a member of BWN Association when John Rossie was President of it- carriers have had a hard time getting on the AO ship list but you had Boots on ground-Vietnam and somehow that can be proven. 

As GBA said-= you need a buddy statement and the USS Hancock has a web site-I assume they have a crew list and maybe a reunion roster- a good way to find a buddy- you can also try TWS (Together We Served)

https://www.usshancockassociation.org/index.php

She is also at Facebook. with over 800 members

https://www.facebook.com/groups/128667737214096/

NOTHING is impossible- ad the only reason the VA AO Ship's list has grown ( links to it are here under a search) is because Navy  veterans themselves took the bull by the horns and proved their ship was within the 12 mile limit that HR 299 reveals , to prove their exposure to AO.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 
 
 
 

 

 

Edited by Berta
have problems with post vanishing am in cloud

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

John, you were correct that the USS Hancock's logs were destroyed:

https://historyhub.history.gov/thread/2340

The letter in this link came from :

"Sincerely,

Textual Reference Archives II Branch (RDT2)

National Archives at College Park, MD"

I was concerned that maybe the VA or some vet rep told you that.

I never believe some of the stuff VA says.  or vet reps say ,for that matter. Sorry I questioned your source.

One of my past vet reps asked me to help a friend of his and had the vet's permission to show me his SMRs.

The VA had denied his claim saying his SMRs were burned in the St Louis fire and NARA had only provided to VA a few pages- that he handed to me.

No watermarks, no charred edges- and since I had been with the local volunteer fire department for 8 years I said firemen at that St Louis Fire never had time to retrieve a few documents here and there. It was VA BS- they probably put the rest of his SMRS into someone else's C file.

The vet sent NARA a SF 180 and got his complete SMRS.

Unfortunately they did not help his claim.

Another vet I ran into at the VAMC  Chapel showed me his VA denial saying his SMRs were burned in the St Louis Fire.

I asked him when he was born- he was a young guy and then I told him -you served years AFTER that fire. The VA is full of BS.

I wrote on a pad in my purse- To XXXX ( I knew his rep) This denial holds  a CUE under 38 CFR 4.6 -and signed it and I said  tell your rep ( state vet rep office was next to the Bath VA Chapel) I told you this ,and he has my phone number if he does not understand the note.

I dont know how he made out.

I only believe things the VA says in writing, if they are Good. VAROs make MANY Errors and I do believe many of those errors  are deliberate.

Hopefully he got his SMRs from NARA web site with a SF 180.

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

The VA announced that they will begin adjudicating the 3 new add-ons for presumptive diseases: Parkinsonism, hypothyroidism, and bladder cancer. Says they "won't make the Vietnam veterans wait any longer." Huh!!! They had the directive in 2014; must take a long time for news to travel down in D.C. Anyway, it says they will take a new look automatically on any veteran who was denied prior. I'm in that group and I don't think I'm waiting too long for them to get back, ya know what I mean? https://www.va.gov/opa/pressrel/pressrelease.cfm?id=5675

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Where is benefit of doubt regarding Vietnam vets and AO? I have three AO conditions as well.  I also have high blood.  If the heart condition and diabetes does not kill me I can look forward to a stroke. Would it be wise to file for high blood and wait for denial and then file again when and if it becomes presumptive?  I really feel for those who were exposed but not stationed in-country.  It has been 50+ years for many of us.  Time is running out for most of us.  I think the VA is just waiting for us to die to save a buck.  The bean counters at the VA and treasury value dollars more than lives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

John999 If you're already 100% P&T, it doesn't make much sense to file. That is UNLESS you are working on SMC's. But I do think your advice is good for most others not in that situation. I actually believe that Htn will be declared a A.O. presumptive as part of a consolidation of all the Veteran benefits at committees in Congress right now. They just announced today they are accepting the three other "new" presumptive disabilities and will automatically review those previously denied. Either file now to get a EED, or wait until it is officially declared service-connected by the VA later and lose out on some extra months back pay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Yeah, I won't get any backpay either way.  VA is dragging their feet on HBP.  I may not live to file.  Most of us Vietnam vets are in our 70's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use