Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Hypothyrodism

Rate this question


Carlos C. Parscal

Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Carlos We assume you are a Vietnam veteran to be using the "presumptive"; it applies only to Vietnam veterans. See diagnostic codes 7800 & 7901 for rating criteria. Basically you are rated at 100% for several months, then you have another C&P and they will rate yours on your residuals, the same as they would for prostrate surgery, for example. What those "residual" symptoms are are not very clear. If you use a non-VA doctor, you might want to get an opinion letter as to what the symptoms are that you currently have and submit it into your medical records. It is a great opportunity to get a low ball rating by the VA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

As in the past 2010  presumptive additions- the VA is 'supposed' to review claims that have been denied in the past ( you mention you were on appeal) but the VA didn't really do that properly for all of the 2010 IHD etc Nehmer claimants.

I too assume with GBA that you served incountry-Vietnam, but recently Blue Water Navy veterans who fit into the 12 mile criteria , and served on a USS ship that was exposed to ASO, won the full gamit of SC benefits under Nehmer.That victory, thanks to NVLSP , is as important as the HR 299 and Procopio decisions.

What part of the appeal process are you in-you filed a NOD and also a I-9 Appeal to the BVA?

I am a Nehmer widow and filed for AO IHD death of my husband as soon as the 2010 regulations were prepared. I sent them everything they needed,with my initial claim to include the New Nehmer court order.

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Berta, yes I was in-country "boots on the ground" as the saying goes. When I talk about "Vietnam" veterans, I am referring to all that meet the VA's definition. So, as of last year, that includes those Navy and Coasties that served within the 12-mile limits. Some also meet the criteria if served in Thailand under certain conditions. Personally, I don't believe we will live long enough to see the VA be all inclusive to those that were exposed to A.O. 3 new presumptives are now included in the law recently past and the VA has to start allowing presumptives for bladder cancer, Parkinson's and hypothyroidism. But notice, the National Academy of Sciences, who is directed by Congress to provide any recommendations (like those 3) found/reported that Hypertension was even more likely to be presumptive. Congress didn't include it in the law. Why? Money. So IMHO, It's going to be a while before Congress holds the VA's feet to the fire again for HTN, because they won't want to spend the money because of the ballooning deficit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

GBArmy said:

"Personally, I don't believe we will live long enough to see the VA be all inclusive to those that were exposed to A.O."

I agree and even their spouses are dying -spouses that were eligible under Nehmer ,as their survivors.

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
7 hours ago, GBArmy said:

So IMHO, It's going to be a while before Congress holds the VA's feet to the fire again for HTN, because they won't want to spend the money because of the ballooning deficit.

Well that's too bad. War's cost money and taking care of the veterans of war should be a very high priority. I had an uncle with boots on the ground that always complained about AO. He died before 65 with a heart attack.

testing my signature

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use