Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Written argument with a waived hearing request

Rate this question


Hucast21

Question

Hi all,

My BVA hearing is scheduled in April, but my attorney is going to submit a written argument and waive hearing request. Has anyone had any experience with this and does this speed up the claims process? Any information will be greatly appreciated.

Thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Hucast21 It sounds to me like your lawyer is of the opinion your case evidence is strong enough that you don't need a face-to-face hearing. You should be asking him if that is the case and see what else you could add that would be stronger if met in person. If he is correct, then yes, it could proceed much quicker for you. Just be sure you are on the same page with the lawyer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
2 hours ago, GBArmy said:

Hucast21 It sounds to me like your lawyer is of the opinion your case evidence is strong enough that you don't need a face-to-face hearing. You should be asking him if that is the case and see what else you could add that would be stronger if met in person. If he is correct, then yes, it could proceed much quicker for you. Just be sure you are on the same page with the lawyer.

I think this is the case because I have documented evidence of my contentions in my military medical records plus an IMO from a specialist. The only hiccup was an unfavorable C&P exam and not filing a claim within a year from leaving service (the rater actually used this reason along with the unfavorable C&P exam to deny me).

To all active duty service members reading this, please document everything while you’re still in and file a claim preferably while you’re transitioning out from service (BDD - Benefits Delivery at Discharge).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Not filing within a year (for presumptives) is NOT a valid reason to deny. Your lawyer hopefully pointed that out in your appeal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
4 minutes ago, GBArmy said:

Not filing within a year (for presumptives) is NOT a valid reason to deny. Your lawyer hopefully pointed that out in your appeal.

Yes, my attorney will point that out in the written argument. In fact, he was surprised that the rater actually brought that up in the Statement of the Case.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

The deny, for not filing within a year, comment, could be a reference to your claimed EED, earliest effective date, and nothing more than that, and having nothing to do with the disability claimed.

Hamslice

 

“There is no hook my friend. There's only what we do.”  Doc Holiday 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder
On 1/17/2021 at 11:03 AM, Hucast21 said:

Hi all,

My BVA hearing is scheduled in April, but my attorney is going to submit a written argument and waive hearing request. Has anyone had any experience with this and does this speed up the claims process? Any information will be greatly appreciated.

Thank you

Sorry not that familiar  with your case.

NOT SURE WHAT LANE YOUR IN FOR PROCESSING OF YOUR CLAIM?  REMEMBER IF YOUR IN THE HRL (Higher Review Lane)  no new evidence allowed  but surely your attorney knows this. 

Was you denied your benefits? is this a case were you disagreed with their decision? or did you apply for Increase?& Denied?

 Whatever the case maybe   I sure hope your in the Supplemental lane have new evidence that has not been summited & I hope your Attorney is correct in  canceling your Hearing.

My reason for saying this  is because the BVA is better and most favorable to get your claims approved  because the VA always are pulling tricks out of a hat that bogus our claims

you might want to call into the exposed vet hadit show TONIGHT and ask them about this,VA Agent-Bethany Spangenberg. & Hadit elder member  VA Certified /Accredited Claims Agent  Alex Graham will be taking our questions

these guys are top notch Certified /Accredited VA Claims Agents  and its Free Information.

the call in #(515) 605-9764  show starts at @ 7:00pm 6:00pm Central time

Good Luck  and let us know How it turns out.

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use