Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

The new comp exam system

Rate this question


Mr cue

Question

So a buddy of mine has a claim that was just remand by bva for new exams.

So for a month they offer exam 150 miles away. The va hospital is 15 min away smh.

So it took them a month to get appoint with the place that does ssi claim exam. 

 

I don't like this it seem alot of veteran are get bad exams adding years of appeal time 

I don't understand the va hospital has ever specialist and has treated most of us all our disabled life.

To me this seem like a step to getting  rid of the va health system. And to denied more veterans

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Claims are denied for many reasons:
 
C & P exams that are deficient and purposefully are geared to deny the claim.***
 
(And VA knows many vets are unable to come up with cash for a strong IMO/IME from a real doctor).
 
Claims that are prepared inaccurately  by the veteran or their representative.
 
Denials that involve probative evidence the VA has deliberately chosen to ignore.
 
Denials that are correct because the claim has no merit.
 
We have seen all of the above here.
 
***** Veterans have had a lot of power regarding many issues, to include the enormous amount of work it took from vets themselves to get on the Blue Water Navy  AO Ships  list, and also from the persistence of two members here, ( one is deceased) have gotten the Thailand AO, and Conus AO claims resolved. The C 123 AO situation started out with one C 123 vet and his small forum and all of their work produced the C123 AO regulations.The Korean War AO regulations were expanded some time ago, due to the work of Korean War Veterans.
But veterans, for Decades, have put up with  and accepted  C & P crap , knowing their chances of getting a fair C & P Can happen but more often than not,
it will be used to deny the claim. 
 
When are veterans going to unite enough to actively do something about this?
 
Why not start a Forum  to challenge the way these C & Ps are being done?
 
Vets could gain the attention of the H VAC if they had submissions of lousy C & P exams from members here..
 
I would be willing share  all of he C & P exams they did on my dead husband, so absolutely ridiculous , knowing he could not speak for himself.......with the H VAC......
and all of which I overcame by fighting back.....only if veterans are willing to begin a movement to join together and contact ,with their C & P evidence,  the House  Veterans Affairs Committee.
But my daughter wants them all published in my book.
 
Veterans could prepare a Bill- google that and it will tell you how to do that- requesting a refund of any IMO/IME fees that VA caused them to incur, to overcome a lousy C & P exam.
 
If the VA is forced to refund costly IMO/IME fees that were the only recourse the claimant had, for a fair resolve of their claim, the VA might alter their C & P program, or instead just agree to pay, right from the git go- for a strong IMO/IME and thus that will save them the cost of their C & P exams, and the cost to the taxpayer of the endless ,and always backlogged, appeals process
 
Or veterans can do nothing about the C & P situation,
and future generations of deserving men and women ,who honorably served our country-
will be stuck with it.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder
49 minutes ago, Berta said:
Great suggestion by Berta-
 
"If the VA is forced to refund costly IMO/IME fees that were the only recourse the claimant had, for a fair resolve of their claim, the VA might alter their C & P program, or instead just agree to pay, right from the git go- for a strong IMO/IME and thus that will save them the cost of their C & P exams, and the cost to the taxpayer of the endless ,and always backlogged, appeals process."
I'd imagine the gov't bureaucrats like OMB would get serious heartburn if they did!
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Well I agree but I like the va doing the exams. 

This new stuff from what I see is crazy now a veteran is to travel 60 100 miles to a exam. Yet right 

When the hospital that he use to is 15 miles.

Now they are sending veterans to ssi doctor. These are two different programs with different rules

Some veterans are waiting 2 months just for them to find a location for a exam

Yes we need to do something.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Why are not our VSO's doing something about these awful C&P exams done by the VA.  I had mental health VA exams done for years where exam doctor only asked one question:   "Are you working?"  I got denied an increase all though the 70's and 80's because VA simply ignored all my evidence and relied on the C&P exam.  We vets need organizations that really represent us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

@Mr cue I agree. In the past, I have had actual VA employees perform a couple of C&P exams. One was dental and was done by a VA employee who was an oral surgeon in charge of the clinic. Another was done by the chief of the audiology clinic. However, about 80% of the C&P exams I had resulted in major errors. 

@john999 Well, we used to have better representation until the VA eliminated the 48 hour hold that allowed VSO staff to review claims. Since that occurred, I had two claims that could have been caught and sent back to address glaring errors (i.e. claimed X, but C&P doc focused on Y). 

 

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use