Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Need Advice-should I Continue Myself Or Use Vso?

Rate this question


bob_abad

Question

Hi gang,

Need your advice. I have this on-going saga(Reopen Claim) of an HTN claim as secondary to DM-II, and Diabetic Nephropathy(kidney issue). I was denied again last Feb/09 even w/ an IMO.

I immediately resubmitted a 'Request for Reconsideration' due to the following reason:

>The VA examiner overlooked a new law(Docket 06-0312) since 12/01/08 - The court concluded that a private medical exam may not be discounted solely because the opining physician did not review my claims file @VA.

>The VA examiner totally ignored the guideline to 'Grant Service Connection to Hypertension after my DM-II and Diabetic Nephropathy(kidney issue)' were diagnosed earlier.

I received a letter(as of Apr.1, 2009) from VA, whether I should continue to resolve my case through DRO or the Traditional Appeal process. Been instructed to mail my reply w/in 60 days.

QQs:

>Will I benefit using a VSO to work with me on this one? What are my chances w/ somebody representing or helping me out? I have been doing it myself since AO initial claim & couple of successful Reopen Claims.

>Or should I continue representing myself? What should I be preparing for upoming informal hearing?..My 1st time..

Hope to hear from you gang. Please help me out. Thanks in advance!

From Bob,

4th Inf. Div; Central Highland Campaign

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Sounds like you are well-versed in VA-speak and what's going on....I'm a HUGE advocate for vet's doing their own claims! A VSO or anyone else is a middleman and usually slows up the process. Of course an atty, will cost you $$$.

I know that not all vets are able to do their own claims....but for those that can (and so far you have), I think it's the best way to go. You have the best & most interest in your own claim. No one cares more than you do.

Good luck!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you decide to go the DRO route, make sure you ask for a formal DRO, that way you will have or rather you can make sure that all your evidence is documented and you will have a transcript of the hearing.

If you know of a good Service Officer, they are good in helping get your paperwork done right and on time and making sure it gets to the VARO. But that's only if you get a good one, not all SO are alike or attentive to Veterans needs.

If you have a good working relationship with you IMO Dr. then you might ask if he would look over your medical history related to your claim and write an addendum to his prior opinion. You have to do things so the VARO Rater has no wiggle room.

Best of Luck.

Rockhound Rider B)

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Purple has made a good point. You've done well on your own. Keep your self a written log starting from initially filing the claim, VA letters received, and evidence submitted, (chronological order). No one knows or understands the claim as well as the individual Vet---cause you live it, first hand! Read and research about your conditions, both on here and elsewhere. Also, review some of the (BVA) Bd of Veterans Appeals cases that contain the conditions you are filing for. CONFIDENCE is what will be required of you after you have completed your homework. CONFIDENCE will get you thru the DRO Hearing. No Confidence??--Go with an Attorney or possibly a good dedicated VSO, (which are many times very hard to find). Also, if you don't mind and are comfortable with doing it, post the denial letter as Rentalguy mentioned. You will find there can be a lot of SHOTGUNS out here that would like a shot at that VA target.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This might be a semantics issue because some of those VARO dopes are illiterate.

Diabetic Nephropathy-

"Diabetic Neuphropathy,which is a disease of the kidneys. This disease can progress to a form of kidney failure known as chronic renal failure. diabetes is the leading cause of chronic renal failure."

VBM NVLSP 2008 edition.

There is an absolutely strong asssociation of DMII to this type of nephropathy.

I myself have extensive literature on this secondary DMII condition.

Could it be the RO is thinking this is neuropathy (completely different disease) and not properly reading it as Nephropathy?

Diabetes Neuropathy is a disease of damage to the nerves.

An apple and a pear

I am stunned here that they denied.

what the heck could they possible attribute this renal problem too-if not to your DMII?

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use